Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Urk. Barth 279
View through Europeana Collections
Hans Peter Schreiner and his wife Regina
Certificate that they are being taken care of by the Heidelberg almsmen (Abraham Rollius, Marx
Vesu [?] from the chancellery, Johann Gorg Lang, Johann Hell, Jeremias Stelpp, Hans
Martin Dahlmann, Hermann Kickhelier, Hans Peter Kling, Hans Jakob Helbert, Adam
Heinrich Sprenger and Johann Berloth) 50 guilders, the guilder to 60 cruisers or
15 batches. For this purpose, they have to pay 30 guilders annually to Fastnacht 2 Gulden.
Cruisers pay interest; payment is due for the first time in 1689. As security
They use their goods in the district of Schriesheim. Should the
Spouses or their heirs remain guilty of interest, the lenders
in their rights and may use the goods until the missing amount
This article deals with the question of how to deal with the problem. But the spouses or their heirs pay the amount borrowed
With the (possibly still pending) annual interest rate, they will receive
the goods, the document loses its validity with its provisions
And all the demands of the lenders are settled. Announcement
The “Schriesheim seal,” which was requested by the two parties of Schultheiß,
Spoons and mayors (Hans Wendel Hofmann; Kilian Baus, Hans Jost Hofmann,
Balthasar Baecher, Hans Schneider, Hans Stephan Höltzer, Georg Geuber, Hans
Valentin Kling, Hans Georg Reuß; Hans Götz [?], Hans Philipp Mack) attached
It is not possible to derive any claims to the Schriesheim.
Heidelberg University Library
Title: Urk. Barth 279
Description:
Hans Peter Schreiner and his wife Regina
Certificate that they are being taken care of by the Heidelberg almsmen (Abraham Rollius, Marx
Vesu [?] from the chancellery, Johann Gorg Lang, Johann Hell, Jeremias Stelpp, Hans
Martin Dahlmann, Hermann Kickhelier, Hans Peter Kling, Hans Jakob Helbert, Adam
Heinrich Sprenger and Johann Berloth) 50 guilders, the guilder to 60 cruisers or
15 batches.
For this purpose, they have to pay 30 guilders annually to Fastnacht 2 Gulden.
Cruisers pay interest; payment is due for the first time in 1689.
As security
They use their goods in the district of Schriesheim.
Should the
Spouses or their heirs remain guilty of interest, the lenders
in their rights and may use the goods until the missing amount
This article deals with the question of how to deal with the problem.
But the spouses or their heirs pay the amount borrowed
With the (possibly still pending) annual interest rate, they will receive
the goods, the document loses its validity with its provisions
And all the demands of the lenders are settled.
Announcement
The “Schriesheim seal,” which was requested by the two parties of Schultheiß,
Spoons and mayors (Hans Wendel Hofmann; Kilian Baus, Hans Jost Hofmann,
Balthasar Baecher, Hans Schneider, Hans Stephan Höltzer, Georg Geuber, Hans
Valentin Kling, Hans Georg Reuß; Hans Götz [?], Hans Philipp Mack) attached
It is not possible to derive any claims to the Schriesheim.
Related Results
Apokatastasisand apostolicity: a response to Oliver Crisp on the question of Barth's universalism
Apokatastasisand apostolicity: a response to Oliver Crisp on the question of Barth's universalism
AbstractOliver Crisp argues that Karl Barth is incoherent on the question of universal salvation. Making use of a modal distinction between contingent and necessary universalism, C...
A Troubled “Ménage à Trois”
A Troubled “Ménage à Trois”
The closeness of the relationship between Barth and Charlotte von Kirschbaum remained publicly unknown for a long time. Only the third volume the Barth-Thurneysen correspondence (p...
Barth and the Evangelicals – Engaging with Barth: Contemporary Evangelical Critiques – Edited by David Gibson and Daniel Strange
Barth and the Evangelicals – Engaging with Barth: Contemporary Evangelical Critiques – Edited by David Gibson and Daniel Strange
AbstractThis review examines twelve conservative evangelical responses to David Gibson and Daniel Strange's Engaging with Barth. Witten in a charitable spirit that gives deference ...
The Impossible Possibility
The Impossible Possibility
AbstractThe word ‘coinherence’ made an early entrance in a lecture that Williams gave on the theologian Karl Barth in 1939. Williams’ fascination with Barth’s phrase ‘impossible po...
Conclusion: Barth’s Dreams
Conclusion: Barth’s Dreams
This concluding chapter to the collection of experiments with Karl Barth and comparative theology explores the two great moments in Barth’s relationship to religions: critique of a...
Urk. Barth 64
Urk. Barth 64
The Dielheimer Schultheiß Heinz Dorse and the judges of the local court (Noltel
Hoffmann, son of Noltel Bürgel, Gerhard Bart, Berthold Hanger, Peter Walther,
Heinrich BHeinrich erm...
Urk. Barth 63
Urk. Barth 63
The Dielheimer Schultheiß Heinz Dorse and the judges of the local court (Noltel
Hoffmann, son of Noltel Bürgel, Gerhard Bart, Berthold Hanger, Peter Walther,
Heinrich BHeinrich erm...
Barth and Patristic Theology
Barth and Patristic Theology
This chapter examines Barth’s approach to patristic theology as well as his engagement with key doctrines and councils of the patristic era. It is clear in relation to Barth’s use ...

