Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Abstract OI-1: OI-1 Decoding breast cancer predisposition genes

View through CrossRef
Abstract Women with one or more first-degree female relatives with a history of breast cancer have a two-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer. This risk increases with the number of affected family members, particularly for those diagnosed at a young age or with bilateral disease. Segregation analyses of breast cancer families led to the identification of inactivating mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer susceptibility genes. Pathogenic variants resulting in truncation of these proteins, along with a small number of pathogenic missense variants, have been associated with 55% to 65% lifetime risk of breast cancer in the general population and up to 85% lifetime risks among women with a strong family history of the disease. In contrast, the influence on cancer risk of many rare variants of uncertain significance (VUS) is not known. Mutations in several genes in addition to BRCA1 and BRCA2 have been implicated in predisposition to breast cancer through family segregation studies. These include moderate risk mutations (relative risk between 2.0 and 5.0) in CHEK2 and ATM, high-risk mutations (relative risk greater than 5.0) in PALB2, and high-risk mutations in CDH1, PTEN, STK11, and TP53 that are associated with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer, Cowden, Peutz-Jeghers, and Li-Fraumeni syndromes. However, risks of breast and other cancers associated with mutations in these and other genes that have been suggested to predispose to cancer have not been established or have very broad confidence intervals. Despite the absence of accurate risk estimates clinical testing with gene panels for hereditary cancer gene mutations has become an integral component of medical management for high-risk families and individuals with triple negative breast cancer. To estimate breast cancer risks several large studies of breast cancer patients from the general population and from high-risk families are underway. These studies are expected to identify the subset of panel genes that are associated with increased risk of breast cancer or breast cancer subtypes and to establish more accurate risks of breast and other cancers. In addition, classification of the clinical relevance of VUS in BRCA1, BRCA2, and other predisposition genes remains a significant problem, with patients unable to benefit from enhanced risk assessment, prevention, and clinical management. Thousands of VUS in BRCA1 and BRCA2 have already been identified through clinical testing and many more in BRCA1, BRCA2, and other predisposition genes are being identified through panel-based genetic testing and tumor sequencing studies. Efforts to classify VUS as neutral or pathogenic have focused on large case-control studies and quantitative multifactorial models based on family history of cancer and pathology. However, more recent studies have established the utility of validated functional assays for VUS assessment. Hundreds of BRCA1 and BRCA2 VUS have been reclassified by commercial testing laboratories or by the ENIGMA consortium that serves as the expert review panel for variants in these genes for the ClinVar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/) and BRCA Exchange (http://brcaexchange.org) publically accessible websites. Common genetic variants associated with breast cancer risk have also been identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS). The magnitude of these associations have ranged from 1.03 to 1.29 in women of European ancestry. While the majority of the 179 known breast cancer variants are associated with estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer, 21 of these show specific associations with ER negative or triple negative (ER negative, PR negative, HER2 negative) breast cancer. The variants in risk loci account for approximately 19% of the familial relative risk of breast cancer. Several studies have recently established that polygenic risk scores derived from these risk variants improve personalized risk assessment by identifying women at increased or reduced risk of breast cancer in the general population and by modifying risks of breast cancer among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. In summary, germline genetic studies have substantially changed the landscape of breast cancer, identifying mutations associated with moderate and high risks of breast cancer in up to 5% of population-based breast cancer cases and 35% of high-risk families and providing personalization of underlying breast cancer risk for all women. Citation Format: Couch FJ. OI-1 Decoding breast cancer predisposition genes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OI-1.
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Title: Abstract OI-1: OI-1 Decoding breast cancer predisposition genes
Description:
Abstract Women with one or more first-degree female relatives with a history of breast cancer have a two-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer.
This risk increases with the number of affected family members, particularly for those diagnosed at a young age or with bilateral disease.
Segregation analyses of breast cancer families led to the identification of inactivating mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer susceptibility genes.
Pathogenic variants resulting in truncation of these proteins, along with a small number of pathogenic missense variants, have been associated with 55% to 65% lifetime risk of breast cancer in the general population and up to 85% lifetime risks among women with a strong family history of the disease.
In contrast, the influence on cancer risk of many rare variants of uncertain significance (VUS) is not known.
Mutations in several genes in addition to BRCA1 and BRCA2 have been implicated in predisposition to breast cancer through family segregation studies.
These include moderate risk mutations (relative risk between 2.
0 and 5.
0) in CHEK2 and ATM, high-risk mutations (relative risk greater than 5.
0) in PALB2, and high-risk mutations in CDH1, PTEN, STK11, and TP53 that are associated with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer, Cowden, Peutz-Jeghers, and Li-Fraumeni syndromes.
However, risks of breast and other cancers associated with mutations in these and other genes that have been suggested to predispose to cancer have not been established or have very broad confidence intervals.
Despite the absence of accurate risk estimates clinical testing with gene panels for hereditary cancer gene mutations has become an integral component of medical management for high-risk families and individuals with triple negative breast cancer.
To estimate breast cancer risks several large studies of breast cancer patients from the general population and from high-risk families are underway.
These studies are expected to identify the subset of panel genes that are associated with increased risk of breast cancer or breast cancer subtypes and to establish more accurate risks of breast and other cancers.
In addition, classification of the clinical relevance of VUS in BRCA1, BRCA2, and other predisposition genes remains a significant problem, with patients unable to benefit from enhanced risk assessment, prevention, and clinical management.
Thousands of VUS in BRCA1 and BRCA2 have already been identified through clinical testing and many more in BRCA1, BRCA2, and other predisposition genes are being identified through panel-based genetic testing and tumor sequencing studies.
Efforts to classify VUS as neutral or pathogenic have focused on large case-control studies and quantitative multifactorial models based on family history of cancer and pathology.
However, more recent studies have established the utility of validated functional assays for VUS assessment.
Hundreds of BRCA1 and BRCA2 VUS have been reclassified by commercial testing laboratories or by the ENIGMA consortium that serves as the expert review panel for variants in these genes for the ClinVar (https://www.
ncbi.
nlm.
nih.
gov/clinvar/) and BRCA Exchange (http://brcaexchange.
org) publically accessible websites.
Common genetic variants associated with breast cancer risk have also been identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS).
The magnitude of these associations have ranged from 1.
03 to 1.
29 in women of European ancestry.
While the majority of the 179 known breast cancer variants are associated with estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer, 21 of these show specific associations with ER negative or triple negative (ER negative, PR negative, HER2 negative) breast cancer.
The variants in risk loci account for approximately 19% of the familial relative risk of breast cancer.
Several studies have recently established that polygenic risk scores derived from these risk variants improve personalized risk assessment by identifying women at increased or reduced risk of breast cancer in the general population and by modifying risks of breast cancer among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.
In summary, germline genetic studies have substantially changed the landscape of breast cancer, identifying mutations associated with moderate and high risks of breast cancer in up to 5% of population-based breast cancer cases and 35% of high-risk families and providing personalization of underlying breast cancer risk for all women.
Citation Format: Couch FJ.
OI-1 Decoding breast cancer predisposition genes [abstract].
In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX.
Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OI-1.

Related Results

Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis of The Breast: A Case Series
Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis of The Breast: A Case Series
Abstract IntroductionDesmoid-type fibromatosis (DTF), also called aggressive fibromatosis, is a rare, benign, locally aggressive condition. Mammary DTF originates from fibroblasts ...
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM). Clinical trials...
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
BRDriver: Breast Cancer Driver Gene Predictor
BRDriver: Breast Cancer Driver Gene Predictor
AbstractThe breast cancer mortality rate is high in developing countries as the early detection of cancer is deficient in patients. The identification of the genes that drive cance...
Stable breast cancer prognosis
Stable breast cancer prognosis
AbstractPredicting breast cancer prognosis helps improve the treatment and management of the disease. In the last decades, many prediction models have been developed for breast can...

Back to Top