Javascript must be enabled to continue!
POSTOPERATIVE WOUND INFECTION RATES FOLLOWING ELECTIVE VS. EMERGENCY LAPAROTOMIES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
View through CrossRef
Background: Wound infection after surgery is a leading source of morbidity after abdominal surgery, especially laparotomies. The increased infection extends the hospital stays, discomfort of the patient, and healthcare expenses. Emergency surgeries are usually conducted under suboptimal conditions, which may increase the risk of acquiring surgical site infections (SSIs). The purpose of the study was to compare the postoperative wound infection in elective and emergency laparotomies and determine the important factors underlying these infections.
Methods: A prospective comparative analysis was conducted on 80 laparotomy patients in one of the tertiary healthcare centers for 3 months. The participants were categorized according to the surgical urgency into elective (n = 40) and emergency groups (n = 40). Patient demographics, comorbidities, wound type, operative time, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification System scores, and antibiotic prophylaxis time were recorded. Surgical site infections were classified using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and evaluated within 30 days after surgery. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test and independent t-test with a level of significance at p < 0.05.
Results: Emergency laparotomies had a higher wound infection rate (30%) than elective ones 5 (12.5%, p = 0.031). In the emergency group, there were more incidences of anemia (16 (40%) vs. 6 (15%), p = 0.008), wound contamination (14 (35%) vs. 4 (10%), p = 0.007), long operation time (>2 hours), higher ASA grades, and delayed prophylactic antibiotic use (8 (20%) vs. 2 (5%), p = 0.045). These were significantly linked to a high risk of SSI.
Conclusion: There is a greater risk of postoperative wound infection after emergency laparotomies, and much of the risk is perioperative-related and modifiable. Intensive preoperative preparation, early antibiotic prophylaxis, and intensive infection control can contribute to mitigating the problem of SSIs in emergency abdominal surgery. It is necessary to define and tackle these risk factors to enhance surgical outcomes and patient recovery.
Health and Research Insights
Title: POSTOPERATIVE WOUND INFECTION RATES FOLLOWING ELECTIVE VS. EMERGENCY LAPAROTOMIES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Description:
Background: Wound infection after surgery is a leading source of morbidity after abdominal surgery, especially laparotomies.
The increased infection extends the hospital stays, discomfort of the patient, and healthcare expenses.
Emergency surgeries are usually conducted under suboptimal conditions, which may increase the risk of acquiring surgical site infections (SSIs).
The purpose of the study was to compare the postoperative wound infection in elective and emergency laparotomies and determine the important factors underlying these infections.
Methods: A prospective comparative analysis was conducted on 80 laparotomy patients in one of the tertiary healthcare centers for 3 months.
The participants were categorized according to the surgical urgency into elective (n = 40) and emergency groups (n = 40).
Patient demographics, comorbidities, wound type, operative time, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification System scores, and antibiotic prophylaxis time were recorded.
Surgical site infections were classified using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and evaluated within 30 days after surgery.
Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test and independent t-test with a level of significance at p < 0.
05.
Results: Emergency laparotomies had a higher wound infection rate (30%) than elective ones 5 (12.
5%, p = 0.
031).
In the emergency group, there were more incidences of anemia (16 (40%) vs.
6 (15%), p = 0.
008), wound contamination (14 (35%) vs.
4 (10%), p = 0.
007), long operation time (>2 hours), higher ASA grades, and delayed prophylactic antibiotic use (8 (20%) vs.
2 (5%), p = 0.
045).
These were significantly linked to a high risk of SSI.
Conclusion: There is a greater risk of postoperative wound infection after emergency laparotomies, and much of the risk is perioperative-related and modifiable.
Intensive preoperative preparation, early antibiotic prophylaxis, and intensive infection control can contribute to mitigating the problem of SSIs in emergency abdominal surgery.
It is necessary to define and tackle these risk factors to enhance surgical outcomes and patient recovery.
Related Results
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...
Thromboembolic Events In Elective vs Non-Elective Foot & Ankle Surgery
Thromboembolic Events In Elective vs Non-Elective Foot & Ankle Surgery
Category: Ankle, Arthroscopy, Hindfoot, Lesser Toes, Midfoot/Forefoot, Sports, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: The occurrence of venous thromboembolisms (VTE) in the management of foo...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract
Introduction
Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Frequency of Wound Infections in Patients Undergoing Caesarean Section
Frequency of Wound Infections in Patients Undergoing Caesarean Section
Objective: To compare the frequency of wound infections in patients undergoing elective and emergency caesarean section. Material and Methods: A total 140 patients with singleton o...
Retrospective Analysis of Bacterial Spectrum and Associated Risk Factors in Post-Operative Wound Infection
Retrospective Analysis of Bacterial Spectrum and Associated Risk Factors in Post-Operative Wound Infection
Introduction
Post-Operative wound infection is very interesting for the surgeons since it is considered inevitable in some cases and also very unfortunate. In spite of great sophi...
Effectiveness of Continuous versus Interrupted Closure of Midline Wound in Emergency Laparotomies in Terms of Wound Dehiscence
Effectiveness of Continuous versus Interrupted Closure of Midline Wound in Emergency Laparotomies in Terms of Wound Dehiscence
Background: Midline laparotomy is widely recognized as the preferred technique for abdominal surgeries due to its simplicity and the effective exposure it provides. Despite its pre...
IMPACT OF PREOPERATIVE NUTRITIONAL STATUS ON WOUND HEALING OUTCOMES FOLLOWING ELECTIVE ABDOMINAL SURGERY
IMPACT OF PREOPERATIVE NUTRITIONAL STATUS ON WOUND HEALING OUTCOMES FOLLOWING ELECTIVE ABDOMINAL SURGERY
Background: Wound healing complications remain a common challenge following elective abdominal surgeries, particularly in patients with compromised nutritional status. Malnutrition...

