Javascript must be enabled to continue!
DdcA antagonizes a bacterial DNA damage checkpoint
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Bacteria coordinate DNA replication and cell division, ensuring that a complete set of genetic material is passed onto the next generation. When bacteria encounter DNA damage or impediments to DNA replication, a cell cycle checkpoint is activated to delay cell division by expressing a cell division inhibitor. The prevailing model for bacterial DNA damage checkpoints is that activation of the DNA damage response and protease mediated degradation of the cell division inhibitor is sufficient to regulate the checkpoint process. Our recent genome-wide screens identified the gene
ddcA
as critical for surviving exposure to a broad spectrum of DNA damage. The
ddcA
deletion phenotypes are dependent on the checkpoint enforcement protein YneA. We found that expression of the checkpoint recovery proteases could not compensate for
ddcA
deletion. Similarly, expression if
ddcA
could not compensate for the absence of the checkpoint recovery proteases, indicating that DdcA function is distinct from the checkpoint recovery step. Deletion of
ddcA
resulted in sensitivity to
yneA
overexpression independent of YneA protein levels or stability, further supporting the conclusion that DdcA regulates YneA through a proteolysis independent mechanism. Using a functional GFP-YneA we found that DdcA inhibits YneA activity independent of YneA localization, suggesting that DdcA may regulate YneA access to its target. These results uncover a regulatory step that is important for controlling the DNA damage checkpoint in bacteria, and suggests that the typical mechanism of degrading the checkpoint enforcement protein is insufficient to control the rate of cell division in response to DNA damage.
Author Summary
All cells coordinate DNA replication and cell division. When cells encounter DNA damage, the process of DNA replication is slowed and the cell must also delay cell division. In bacteria, the process has long been thought to occur using two principle modes of regulation. The first, is RecA coated ssDNA transmits the signal of DNA damage through inactivation of the repressor of the DNA damage (SOS) response regulon, which results in expression of a cell division inhibitor establishing the checkpoint. The second principle step is protease mediated degradation of the cell division inhibitor relieving the checkpoint. Recent work by our lab and others has suggested that this process may be more complex than originally thought. Here, we investigated a gene of unknown function that we previously identified as important for survival when the bacterium
Bacillus subtilis
is exposed to DNA damage. We found that this gene negatively regulates the cell division inhibitor, but is functionally distinct from the checkpoint recovery process. We provide evidence that this gene functions as an antagonist to establishing the DNA damage checkpoint. Our study uncovers a novel layer of regulation in the bacterial DNA damage checkpoint process challenging the longstanding models established in the bacterial DNA damage response field.
Title: DdcA antagonizes a bacterial DNA damage checkpoint
Description:
Abstract
Bacteria coordinate DNA replication and cell division, ensuring that a complete set of genetic material is passed onto the next generation.
When bacteria encounter DNA damage or impediments to DNA replication, a cell cycle checkpoint is activated to delay cell division by expressing a cell division inhibitor.
The prevailing model for bacterial DNA damage checkpoints is that activation of the DNA damage response and protease mediated degradation of the cell division inhibitor is sufficient to regulate the checkpoint process.
Our recent genome-wide screens identified the gene
ddcA
as critical for surviving exposure to a broad spectrum of DNA damage.
The
ddcA
deletion phenotypes are dependent on the checkpoint enforcement protein YneA.
We found that expression of the checkpoint recovery proteases could not compensate for
ddcA
deletion.
Similarly, expression if
ddcA
could not compensate for the absence of the checkpoint recovery proteases, indicating that DdcA function is distinct from the checkpoint recovery step.
Deletion of
ddcA
resulted in sensitivity to
yneA
overexpression independent of YneA protein levels or stability, further supporting the conclusion that DdcA regulates YneA through a proteolysis independent mechanism.
Using a functional GFP-YneA we found that DdcA inhibits YneA activity independent of YneA localization, suggesting that DdcA may regulate YneA access to its target.
These results uncover a regulatory step that is important for controlling the DNA damage checkpoint in bacteria, and suggests that the typical mechanism of degrading the checkpoint enforcement protein is insufficient to control the rate of cell division in response to DNA damage.
Author Summary
All cells coordinate DNA replication and cell division.
When cells encounter DNA damage, the process of DNA replication is slowed and the cell must also delay cell division.
In bacteria, the process has long been thought to occur using two principle modes of regulation.
The first, is RecA coated ssDNA transmits the signal of DNA damage through inactivation of the repressor of the DNA damage (SOS) response regulon, which results in expression of a cell division inhibitor establishing the checkpoint.
The second principle step is protease mediated degradation of the cell division inhibitor relieving the checkpoint.
Recent work by our lab and others has suggested that this process may be more complex than originally thought.
Here, we investigated a gene of unknown function that we previously identified as important for survival when the bacterium
Bacillus subtilis
is exposed to DNA damage.
We found that this gene negatively regulates the cell division inhibitor, but is functionally distinct from the checkpoint recovery process.
We provide evidence that this gene functions as an antagonist to establishing the DNA damage checkpoint.
Our study uncovers a novel layer of regulation in the bacterial DNA damage checkpoint process challenging the longstanding models established in the bacterial DNA damage response field.
Related Results
Genome wide hypomethylation and youth-associated DNA gap reduction promoting DNA damage and senescence-associated pathogenesis
Genome wide hypomethylation and youth-associated DNA gap reduction promoting DNA damage and senescence-associated pathogenesis
Abstract
Background: Age-associated epigenetic alteration is the underlying cause of DNA damage in aging cells. Two types of youth-associated DNA-protection epigenetic mark...
Genome wide hypomethylation and youth-associated DNA gap reduction promoting DNA damage and senescence-associated pathogenesis
Genome wide hypomethylation and youth-associated DNA gap reduction promoting DNA damage and senescence-associated pathogenesis
Introduction: The United States currently faces two opioid crises, an evolved crisis currently manifesting as widespread abuse of illicit opioids, and a crisis in pain management l...
Abstract 4679: A novel assay to predict susceptibility to tobacco-induced disease.
Abstract 4679: A novel assay to predict susceptibility to tobacco-induced disease.
Abstract
Background: Tobacco misuse is the leading preventable cause of morbidity and mortality in the world. Tobacco-induced DNA damage is one of the main mechanism...
MICRURGICAL STUDIES IN CELL PHYSIOLOGY
MICRURGICAL STUDIES IN CELL PHYSIOLOGY
I. The Plasmalemma.
1. On the plasmalemma of amebæ CaCl2 antagonizes the toxic action of LiCl better than it does NaCl, and still better than it does KCl. MgCl2 anta...
Abstract A21: Enhancing chemotherapeutic responses in CNS malignancy through suppression of hyperactive DNA damage repair pathways
Abstract A21: Enhancing chemotherapeutic responses in CNS malignancy through suppression of hyperactive DNA damage repair pathways
Abstract
Introduction: We are targeting DNA repair pathways to enhance existing chemoradiotherapeutic strategies against medulloblastoma (MB) and malignant glioma (M...
Echinococcus granulosus in Environmental Samples: A Cross-Sectional Molecular Study
Echinococcus granulosus in Environmental Samples: A Cross-Sectional Molecular Study
Abstract
Introduction
Echinococcosis, caused by tapeworms of the Echinococcus genus, remains a significant zoonotic disease globally. The disease is particularly prevalent in areas...
Abstract 1756: Electronic cigarettes induce DNA damage in the oral epithelium of users
Abstract 1756: Electronic cigarettes induce DNA damage in the oral epithelium of users
Abstract
Background: The use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) has skyrocketed among adolescents and young adults. E-cigs are promoted as safer than combustible ciga...
Abstract 3098: Leukemia stem cells demonstrate enhanced DNA damage repair and chemoresistance in AML
Abstract 3098: Leukemia stem cells demonstrate enhanced DNA damage repair and chemoresistance in AML
Abstract
Leukemia stem cells demonstrate enhanced DNA damage repair and chemoresistance in AML
Relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is common and t...

