Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

DdcA antagonizes a bacterial DNA damage checkpoint

View through CrossRef
AbstractBacteria coordinate DNA replication and cell division, ensuring that a complete set of genetic material is passed onto the next generation. When bacteria encounter DNA damage or impediments to DNA replication, a cell cycle checkpoint is activated to delay cell division by expressing a cell division inhibitor. The prevailing model for bacterial DNA damage checkpoints is that activation of the DNA damage response and protease mediated degradation of the cell division inhibitor is sufficient to regulate the checkpoint process. Our recent genome-wide screens identified the geneddcAas critical for surviving exposure to a broad spectrum of DNA damage. TheddcAdeletion phenotypes are dependent on the checkpoint enforcement protein YneA. We found that expression of the checkpoint recovery proteases could not compensate forddcAdeletion. Similarly, expression ifddcAcould not compensate for the absence of the checkpoint recovery proteases, indicating that DdcA function is distinct from the checkpoint recovery step. Deletion ofddcAresulted in sensitivity toyneAoverexpression independent of YneA protein levels or stability, further supporting the conclusion that DdcA regulates YneA through a proteolysis independent mechanism. Using a functional GFP-YneA we found that DdcA inhibits YneA activity independent of YneA localization, suggesting that DdcA may regulate YneA access to its target. These results uncover a regulatory step that is important for controlling the DNA damage checkpoint in bacteria, and suggests that the typical mechanism of degrading the checkpoint enforcement protein is insufficient to control the rate of cell division in response to DNA damage.Author SummaryAll cells coordinate DNA replication and cell division. When cells encounter DNA damage, the process of DNA replication is slowed and the cell must also delay cell division. In bacteria, the process has long been thought to occur using two principle modes of regulation. The first, is RecA coated ssDNA transmits the signal of DNA damage through inactivation of the repressor of the DNA damage (SOS) response regulon, which results in expression of a cell division inhibitor establishing the checkpoint. The second principle step is protease mediated degradation of the cell division inhibitor relieving the checkpoint. Recent work by our lab and others has suggested that this process may be more complex than originally thought. Here, we investigated a gene of unknown function that we previously identified as important for survival when the bacteriumBacillus subtilisis exposed to DNA damage. We found that this gene negatively regulates the cell division inhibitor, but is functionally distinct from the checkpoint recovery process. We provide evidence that this gene functions as an antagonist to establishing the DNA damage checkpoint. Our study uncovers a novel layer of regulation in the bacterial DNA damage checkpoint process challenging the longstanding models established in the bacterial DNA damage response field.
Title: DdcA antagonizes a bacterial DNA damage checkpoint
Description:
AbstractBacteria coordinate DNA replication and cell division, ensuring that a complete set of genetic material is passed onto the next generation.
When bacteria encounter DNA damage or impediments to DNA replication, a cell cycle checkpoint is activated to delay cell division by expressing a cell division inhibitor.
The prevailing model for bacterial DNA damage checkpoints is that activation of the DNA damage response and protease mediated degradation of the cell division inhibitor is sufficient to regulate the checkpoint process.
Our recent genome-wide screens identified the geneddcAas critical for surviving exposure to a broad spectrum of DNA damage.
TheddcAdeletion phenotypes are dependent on the checkpoint enforcement protein YneA.
We found that expression of the checkpoint recovery proteases could not compensate forddcAdeletion.
Similarly, expression ifddcAcould not compensate for the absence of the checkpoint recovery proteases, indicating that DdcA function is distinct from the checkpoint recovery step.
Deletion ofddcAresulted in sensitivity toyneAoverexpression independent of YneA protein levels or stability, further supporting the conclusion that DdcA regulates YneA through a proteolysis independent mechanism.
Using a functional GFP-YneA we found that DdcA inhibits YneA activity independent of YneA localization, suggesting that DdcA may regulate YneA access to its target.
These results uncover a regulatory step that is important for controlling the DNA damage checkpoint in bacteria, and suggests that the typical mechanism of degrading the checkpoint enforcement protein is insufficient to control the rate of cell division in response to DNA damage.
Author SummaryAll cells coordinate DNA replication and cell division.
When cells encounter DNA damage, the process of DNA replication is slowed and the cell must also delay cell division.
In bacteria, the process has long been thought to occur using two principle modes of regulation.
The first, is RecA coated ssDNA transmits the signal of DNA damage through inactivation of the repressor of the DNA damage (SOS) response regulon, which results in expression of a cell division inhibitor establishing the checkpoint.
The second principle step is protease mediated degradation of the cell division inhibitor relieving the checkpoint.
Recent work by our lab and others has suggested that this process may be more complex than originally thought.
Here, we investigated a gene of unknown function that we previously identified as important for survival when the bacteriumBacillus subtilisis exposed to DNA damage.
We found that this gene negatively regulates the cell division inhibitor, but is functionally distinct from the checkpoint recovery process.
We provide evidence that this gene functions as an antagonist to establishing the DNA damage checkpoint.
Our study uncovers a novel layer of regulation in the bacterial DNA damage checkpoint process challenging the longstanding models established in the bacterial DNA damage response field.

Related Results

Genome wide hypomethylation and youth-associated DNA gap reduction promoting DNA damage and senescence-associated pathogenesis
Genome wide hypomethylation and youth-associated DNA gap reduction promoting DNA damage and senescence-associated pathogenesis
Abstract Background: Age-associated epigenetic alteration is the underlying cause of DNA damage in aging cells. Two types of youth-associated DNA-protection epigenetic mark...
Abstract 4679: A novel assay to predict susceptibility to tobacco-induced disease.
Abstract 4679: A novel assay to predict susceptibility to tobacco-induced disease.
Abstract Background: Tobacco misuse is the leading preventable cause of morbidity and mortality in the world. Tobacco-induced DNA damage is one of the main mechanism...
Echinococcus granulosus in Environmental Samples: A Cross-Sectional Molecular Study
Echinococcus granulosus in Environmental Samples: A Cross-Sectional Molecular Study
Abstract Introduction Echinococcosis, caused by tapeworms of the Echinococcus genus, remains a significant zoonotic disease globally. The disease is particularly prevalent in areas...
MICRURGICAL STUDIES IN CELL PHYSIOLOGY
MICRURGICAL STUDIES IN CELL PHYSIOLOGY
I. The Plasmalemma. 1. On the plasmalemma of amebæ CaCl2 antagonizes the toxic action of LiCl better than it does NaCl, and still better than it does KCl. MgCl2 anta...
The Mms22-Rtt107 axis dampens the DNA damage checkpoint by reducing the stability of the Rad9 checkpoint mediator
The Mms22-Rtt107 axis dampens the DNA damage checkpoint by reducing the stability of the Rad9 checkpoint mediator
Abstract The DNA damage checkpoint is a highly conserved signaling pathway induced by genotoxin exposure or endogenous genome stress. It alters many cellular processes such...
Discovery of a two protease DNA damage checkpoint recovery mechanism
Discovery of a two protease DNA damage checkpoint recovery mechanism
AbstractThe DNA damage response is a signaling pathway found throughout biology. In many bacteria the DNA damage checkpoint is enforced by inducing expression of a small, membrane ...
Impact of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy on The Overall Survival in Elderly Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Impact of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy on The Overall Survival in Elderly Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Abstract Purpose: We analyzed the relationship between a history of immune checkpoint inhibitor and overall survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) age...
Abstract 1071: Impact of AR activation status on the DNA damage response.
Abstract 1071: Impact of AR activation status on the DNA damage response.
Abstract Recent evidence implicates the androgen receptor (AR) as a critical modulator of the DNA damage response in prostate cancer. Treatment for locally advanced ...

Back to Top