Javascript must be enabled to continue!
L51653 Fracture Behavior of Girth Welds Containing Natural Defects Comparison with Existing Standards
View through CrossRef
The first use of radiographic standards for inspection and acceptance of finished girth welds was adopted by API in 1953. This standard was largely based on the Unfired Pressure Vessel Code� which was adopted by ASME in 1931. At that time and to this day, weld defect acceptance standards are based on workmanship principles. In other words, the so called "Workmanship defect acceptance standards"� reflect the weld quality levels produced by. a trained welder using satisfactory materials, equipment and procedures. For many years exclusive use was made of the API 1104 workmanship defect acceptance levels for all field pipeline and related facilities welds. This, and very similar defect acceptance standards (e.g. BS 4515, CSA 2184, AS 1697, etc.) are used in many countries throughout the world. Though the specified acceptance levels have no scientific basis, the use of workmanship standards has provided an adequate level of quality control for many years. Particularly worthy of attention in this context is the fact that the currently stipulated levels have been developed for welds in lower strength pipe grades. Unfortunately, the developments in acceptance levels have not kept pace with those occurring in-pipeline technology. Furthermore, pipe size, strength and toughness, weld metal properties or pipeline operating conditions are not considered in the present-day defect acceptance standards. Problems of this kind have led companies involved in gas/oil transporting activities to develop their own standard requirements or at least to produce a supplement to the general standards.
This report describes the results of an investigation into the engineering significance of girth weld defect acceptance criteria based upon weld quality (or workmanship) considerations. To this end, research efforts were divided into a theoretical and an experimental part. The theoretical study involved a comparison of internationally used weld quality standards and codes for pipeline welding in order to identify the general features common to them and to obtain a clear view of the different acceptability criteria. The experimental part was designed to provide factual information on the failure behaviour of defective girth welds in large pipe diameter pipe lines. The focal point of the experimental examinations was to compare, on the basis of wide plate test specimen behaviour, the performance levels of girth welds containing planar weld defects which were grossly out of tolerance with respect to most present-day weld quality (workmanship standards) specifications.
Title: L51653 Fracture Behavior of Girth Welds Containing Natural Defects Comparison with Existing Standards
Description:
The first use of radiographic standards for inspection and acceptance of finished girth welds was adopted by API in 1953.
This standard was largely based on the Unfired Pressure Vessel Code� which was adopted by ASME in 1931.
At that time and to this day, weld defect acceptance standards are based on workmanship principles.
In other words, the so called "Workmanship defect acceptance standards"� reflect the weld quality levels produced by.
a trained welder using satisfactory materials, equipment and procedures.
For many years exclusive use was made of the API 1104 workmanship defect acceptance levels for all field pipeline and related facilities welds.
This, and very similar defect acceptance standards (e.
g.
BS 4515, CSA 2184, AS 1697, etc.
) are used in many countries throughout the world.
Though the specified acceptance levels have no scientific basis, the use of workmanship standards has provided an adequate level of quality control for many years.
Particularly worthy of attention in this context is the fact that the currently stipulated levels have been developed for welds in lower strength pipe grades.
Unfortunately, the developments in acceptance levels have not kept pace with those occurring in-pipeline technology.
Furthermore, pipe size, strength and toughness, weld metal properties or pipeline operating conditions are not considered in the present-day defect acceptance standards.
Problems of this kind have led companies involved in gas/oil transporting activities to develop their own standard requirements or at least to produce a supplement to the general standards.
This report describes the results of an investigation into the engineering significance of girth weld defect acceptance criteria based upon weld quality (or workmanship) considerations.
To this end, research efforts were divided into a theoretical and an experimental part.
The theoretical study involved a comparison of internationally used weld quality standards and codes for pipeline welding in order to identify the general features common to them and to obtain a clear view of the different acceptability criteria.
The experimental part was designed to provide factual information on the failure behaviour of defective girth welds in large pipe diameter pipe lines.
The focal point of the experimental examinations was to compare, on the basis of wide plate test specimen behaviour, the performance levels of girth welds containing planar weld defects which were grossly out of tolerance with respect to most present-day weld quality (workmanship standards) specifications.
Related Results
Relationship between Measured Buttressed Stem Girth and Girth Derived from Actual Basal Area in Lagerstroemia floribunda Jack in Eastern Thailand
Relationship between Measured Buttressed Stem Girth and Girth Derived from Actual Basal Area in Lagerstroemia floribunda Jack in Eastern Thailand
Background and Objectives: Accurate measurement of stem size is a fundamental component of forest mensuration, as it directly underpins the estimation of basal area, timber volume,...
Fatigue Test Geometries Used for Girth Welds and Assessment of Residual Stress: State of the Art
Fatigue Test Geometries Used for Girth Welds and Assessment of Residual Stress: State of the Art
Abstract
Fatigue testing of girth welds in large tubes plays a crucial role in ensuring the structural integrity and safety of various structures such as oil and gas...
Fatigue assessment and S–N curve development for one-sided girth welds in close proximity in tubular structures
Fatigue assessment and S–N curve development for one-sided girth welds in close proximity in tubular structures
Abstract
Girth-welded structures, such as tubular trusses, risers, and pipelines, are frequently subjected to cyclic loading. Therefore, conducting a fatigue analysis of ...
Stochastic Propagation of Discrete Fracture Networks
Stochastic Propagation of Discrete Fracture Networks
This reference is for an abstract only. A full paper was not submitted for this conference.
Abstract
Fractures are ubiquitous st...
Sequential Propagation of Multiple Fractures in Horizontal Wells
Sequential Propagation of Multiple Fractures in Horizontal Wells
ABSTRACT:
Simultaneous fracturing and zipper fracturing of horizontal wells has rapidly evolved to the development of unconventional oil and gas. The fracture int...
Fracture Modelling Using Seismic Based Fracture Intensity Volume, a Case Study in Middle East
Fracture Modelling Using Seismic Based Fracture Intensity Volume, a Case Study in Middle East
Abstract
In this paper, a case study in a fractured carbonate reservoir is presented to demonstrate the approach of fracture modeling using fracture intensity vol...
Ultrasonic Inspection Of Underwater Fillet Welds
Ultrasonic Inspection Of Underwater Fillet Welds
INTRODUCTION
Underwater construction utilizing welding is becoming a standard practice in today's offshore operations. Extensive effort by many organizations to i...
Full Scale Reeling Simulation Tests of Girth Welded X60 HFW Linepipe
Full Scale Reeling Simulation Tests of Girth Welded X60 HFW Linepipe
The reel-lay method is a fast and cost efficient installation process for offshore rigid steel pipelines. Pipelines installed by the reel-lay method are plastically deformed due to...

