Impact of department chair gender on paid parental leave across American anaesthesiology residencies

Background Residency training and parenthood are conflicting pursuits for many residents, as both often occur during similar years of life. Online policy about paid parental leave for residents is important for not only mitigating this dilemma, but also ensuring that the associated health benefits can be fully capitalised on. Purpose Investigate the extent of advertised paid parental leave for anaesthesiology residencies in the USA and to explore whether this had an association with the gender of the department chair for these programmes. Analysis of Canadian anaesthesiology residencies was performed to assess whether a nation with federally protected paid parental leave yielded disparate rates of advertised paid parental leave. Methods All accredited US anaesthesiology residency programme websites were reviewed to determine the gender of the department chair and the existence of advertised paid parental leave for residents. χ 2 analysis was used to determine if there was a statistically significant association between the gender of anaesthesiology residency department chairs and paid parental leave advertised. Rates of advertised paid parental leave were compared with those seen in Canadian anaesthesiology residencies. Results US anaesthesiology residency department chairs were 84% (137/164) men. Of the men-led programmes, 42% (58/137) advertised paid parental leave, while 70% (19/27) of women-led programmes advertised such benefits (p<0.05). Overall, 47% of (77/164) of US anaesthesiology residencies advertised paid parental leave, while 76% (13/17) of Canadian anaesthesiology residencies advertised paid parental leave (p<0.05). Conclusion In the USA, anaesthesiology residencies with department chairs held by women had a higher rate of advertised paid parental leave. Such findings call attention to the potential downstream effects of lacking diversity in leadership within medicine. When compared with the USA, Canada was found to have higher rates of advertised paid parental leave across their anaesthesiology residencies, potentially highlighting the impact of federal legislature on medical residents.