Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Outcomes of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Surgery for Prolapsed Intervertebral Disc: A Single-center Study
View through CrossRef
Introduction: Unilateral biportal endoscopic surgery (UBES) has emerged as a promising minimally invasive technique for treating lumbar spine disorders. However, a comprehensive evaluation of its long-term outcomes still needs to be improved.
Aims and Objectives: This prospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of posterior decompression for lumbar disc prolapse done by unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE), including neurological improvement, functional status, and complications.
Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing UBES were included from a tertiary care center, Hamidia Hospital, associated with Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh. Demographic data, pre-operative clinical characteristics, and surgical details were collected. Neurological improvement was assessed at preoperative, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Functional assessment using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Macnab criteria was performed at pre-operative, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively at each follow-up visit.
Results: 50 patients of lumbar disc prolapse (66% male and 34% female) with a mean age of 40.38 ± 9.76 were enrolled, who underwent posterior decompression by UBE surgeries, most performed at L4-L5 (42%) and L5-S1 (40%) levels. Neurological status significantly improved postoperatively, with sustained enhancement in 1 year (96% improvement). Functional assessment revealed significant reductions in ODI scores (from 84.52 ± 4.04 preoperatively to 14.18 ± 3.2 [P = 0.001] at 1 year), VAS scores for back and leg pain (from 8.40 ± 0.756 preoperatively to 0.40 ± 0.495 [P = 0.001] at 1 year), and Macnab criteria outcomes as excellent at 1 year in 96% of patients.
Conclusion: UBES demonstrates favorable outcomes for lumbar disc prolapse on 1-year follow-up, including neurological improvement, pain relief, and functional outcomes. UBES represents a promising minimally invasive approach for treating lumbar spine disorders, potentially enhancing patient quality of life.
Keywords: Unilateral biportal endoscopic surgery, lumbar spine, minimally invasive surgery, short-term outcomes, pain relief.
Indian Orthopaedic Research Group
Title: Outcomes of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Surgery for Prolapsed Intervertebral Disc: A Single-center Study
Description:
Introduction: Unilateral biportal endoscopic surgery (UBES) has emerged as a promising minimally invasive technique for treating lumbar spine disorders.
However, a comprehensive evaluation of its long-term outcomes still needs to be improved.
Aims and Objectives: This prospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of posterior decompression for lumbar disc prolapse done by unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE), including neurological improvement, functional status, and complications.
Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing UBES were included from a tertiary care center, Hamidia Hospital, associated with Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh.
Demographic data, pre-operative clinical characteristics, and surgical details were collected.
Neurological improvement was assessed at preoperative, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively.
Functional assessment using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Macnab criteria was performed at pre-operative, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively at each follow-up visit.
Results: 50 patients of lumbar disc prolapse (66% male and 34% female) with a mean age of 40.
38 ± 9.
76 were enrolled, who underwent posterior decompression by UBE surgeries, most performed at L4-L5 (42%) and L5-S1 (40%) levels.
Neurological status significantly improved postoperatively, with sustained enhancement in 1 year (96% improvement).
Functional assessment revealed significant reductions in ODI scores (from 84.
52 ± 4.
04 preoperatively to 14.
18 ± 3.
2 [P = 0.
001] at 1 year), VAS scores for back and leg pain (from 8.
40 ± 0.
756 preoperatively to 0.
40 ± 0.
495 [P = 0.
001] at 1 year), and Macnab criteria outcomes as excellent at 1 year in 96% of patients.
Conclusion: UBES demonstrates favorable outcomes for lumbar disc prolapse on 1-year follow-up, including neurological improvement, pain relief, and functional outcomes.
UBES represents a promising minimally invasive approach for treating lumbar spine disorders, potentially enhancing patient quality of life.
Keywords: Unilateral biportal endoscopic surgery, lumbar spine, minimally invasive surgery, short-term outcomes, pain relief.
Related Results
An assessment of Discectomy Surgery on Prolapsed Lumbar Intervertebral Disc.
An assessment of Discectomy Surgery on Prolapsed Lumbar Intervertebral Disc.
Background: Basically, human backbone or spinal column is of a chain of bones also known as vertebrae. Spinal cord runs through the spinal column. Lumbar discectomy is a type of su...
An assessment of Discectomy Surgery on Prolapsed Lumbar Intervertebral Disc
An assessment of Discectomy Surgery on Prolapsed Lumbar Intervertebral Disc
Background: Basically, human backbone or spinal column is of a chain of bones also known as vertebrae. Spinal cord runs through the spinal column. Lumbar discectomy is a type of su...
Disc Regeneration Using MSC Transplanted via the Endplate Route
Disc Regeneration Using MSC Transplanted via the Endplate Route
Introduction
Stem cell based intervertebral disc (IVD) regeneration is quickly moving toward clinical applications.
...
Modeling of intervertebral discs’ parameters of the lumbar spine base on somatometric data
Modeling of intervertebral discs’ parameters of the lumbar spine base on somatometric data
The relevance of the study arises from the high prevalence of spinal column pathology and the rapid advancement of diagnostic technologies, which necessitate the refinement of crit...
Features of Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis
Features of Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis
Summary. Minimally invasive spine surgery is currently undergoing rapid development. New techniques for the treatment of degenerative-dystrophic diseases of the spine have been int...
One-nostril endoscopic endonasal approach for pituitary macroadenoma resection
One-nostril endoscopic endonasal approach for pituitary macroadenoma resection
Abstract
Introduction: Endoscopic techniques have become the standard approach for pituitary adenoma surgery, providing improved visualization of the hypophyseal fossa and facili...
Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy for L5-S1 Extraforaminal Stenosis (Far Out Syndrome) – Technical note With Literature Review
Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy for L5-S1 Extraforaminal Stenosis (Far Out Syndrome) – Technical note With Literature Review
Introduction: Extraforaminal stenosis in L5–S1, or far-out syndrome (FOS), is defined as L5 nerve compression by the transverse process (TP) of the L5 and the ala of the sacrum and...
Lumbar intervertebral disks: morphometric parameters and indices
Lumbar intervertebral disks: morphometric parameters and indices
An important element of evidence-based medicine is to take into account the individual variability of the indicators of the norm of intervertebral discs, which is undoubtedly the b...

