Javascript must be enabled to continue!
“What Does Protest Mean?”: A Freirean Intervention In Tamil Genocide Education.
View through CrossRef
Genocide education in Canadian classrooms is often focused on theoretical concepts and legal processes that don’t account for the lived realities of students who encounter ongoing genocidal projects. In the case of the Tamil Genocide, the Ontario government passed Bill 104, or the Tamil Genocide Education Week Act, which mandated a seven-day period in May of each year to promote education around the Tamil Genocide. Despite this, students continue to face repression, silencing, and otherwise lack of meaningful resources to explore these topics. This paper examines how Tamil, Tamil-Canadian, and/or Tamil-speaking students experience repression for attempting to discuss the Tamil Genocide in their classroom and how this inhibits their ability to recognize, address, and act on the very real ways intergenerational memories of 2009 show up in their everyday lives. It will explore how critical pedagogue and scholar Paulo Freire’s critique of power and authoritarianism masked as benevolence offers a critical juncture in the study of Tamil Genocide education. Rather than be limited to the parameters of a classroom environment, this paper considers how genocide education takes place in assemblies, community halls, and even within the home. It weaves in reflections from the author as a Tamil Genocide Education facilitator with critical pedagogical theory in an attempt to think laterally with and across interlocking oppressions to conceptualize a generative space in genocide education. By engaging with the overlapping, contradictory, and contextually dense narratives of learners, Tamil Genocide educators can reject singular narrative education and imagine alternative possibilities.
Title: “What Does Protest Mean?”: A Freirean Intervention In Tamil Genocide Education.
Description:
Genocide education in Canadian classrooms is often focused on theoretical concepts and legal processes that don’t account for the lived realities of students who encounter ongoing genocidal projects.
In the case of the Tamil Genocide, the Ontario government passed Bill 104, or the Tamil Genocide Education Week Act, which mandated a seven-day period in May of each year to promote education around the Tamil Genocide.
Despite this, students continue to face repression, silencing, and otherwise lack of meaningful resources to explore these topics.
This paper examines how Tamil, Tamil-Canadian, and/or Tamil-speaking students experience repression for attempting to discuss the Tamil Genocide in their classroom and how this inhibits their ability to recognize, address, and act on the very real ways intergenerational memories of 2009 show up in their everyday lives.
It will explore how critical pedagogue and scholar Paulo Freire’s critique of power and authoritarianism masked as benevolence offers a critical juncture in the study of Tamil Genocide education.
Rather than be limited to the parameters of a classroom environment, this paper considers how genocide education takes place in assemblies, community halls, and even within the home.
It weaves in reflections from the author as a Tamil Genocide Education facilitator with critical pedagogical theory in an attempt to think laterally with and across interlocking oppressions to conceptualize a generative space in genocide education.
By engaging with the overlapping, contradictory, and contextually dense narratives of learners, Tamil Genocide educators can reject singular narrative education and imagine alternative possibilities.
Related Results
History of Genocides
History of Genocides
The textbook presents the mass killings and other atrocities that have occurred worldwide and have been defined as genocide by international tribunals, other international bodies, ...
Seditious Spaces
Seditious Spaces
The title ‘Seditious Spaces’ is derived from one aspect of Britain’s colonial legacy in Malaysia (formerly Malaya): the Sedition Act 1948. While colonial rule may seem like it was ...
Cases Studied in <em>Genocide Studies and Prevention</em> and <em>Journal of Genocide Research</em> and Implications for the Field of Genocide Studies
Cases Studied in <em>Genocide Studies and Prevention</em> and <em>Journal of Genocide Research</em> and Implications for the Field of Genocide Studies
The adoption of the Genocide Convention in 1948 was accompanied by the emergence of genocide as a field of study, first in the form of Holocaust Studies, followed by Genocide Studi...
Cultural Genocide in Law and Politics
Cultural Genocide in Law and Politics
The violent and nonviolent repression of cultural groups, or using cultural means to destroy a group, is often identified as “cultural genocide.” The concept’s association with gen...
The Return of Cultural Genocide?
The Return of Cultural Genocide?
Today, cultural genocide and the protection of cultural groups return to occupy criminal international law. Most writers see it as a new problem in need of normative solution. In t...
How Do People Change Their Technology Use in Protest?
How Do People Change Their Technology Use in Protest?
Researchers and the media have become increasingly interested in protest users, or people who change (protest use) or stop (protest non-use) their use of a company's products becau...
Reframing Genocide
Reframing Genocide
Genocide has recently taken center stage in international affairs. Both Israel and Hamas and Russia and Ukraine have accused one another of committing genocide or having genocidal ...
Why Prevention Fails: Chronicling the Genocide in Artsakh
Why Prevention Fails: Chronicling the Genocide in Artsakh
Azerbaijan’s September 19, 2023 attack on the Republic of Artsakh resulted in the almost total displacement of the indigenous Armenian population, making it one of the most success...

