Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Socrates (469–399 BCE)

View through CrossRef
Abstract We know little about Socrates, who so changed the course of philosophy that those who preceded him are called Presocratics. Tradition tells us one way Socrates differed from those predecessors is that he wrote nothing. Our knowledge of him, therefore, is unavoidably mediated: we know Socrates only through others, three of whom – Aristophanes, Plato, and Xenophon – knew him personally and confront us with differing and potentially unreliable evidence. Aristophanes is an obvious, if friendly critic, and Plato and Xenophon present themselves as defenders of Socrates. We might also look to scattered remarks of Aristotle and other Greek authors and to the reports handed down by later generations – Cicero, for instance, and Diogenes Laertius – but discovering the “historical Socrates” has long posed a challenge for scholars.
Title: Socrates (469–399 BCE)
Description:
Abstract We know little about Socrates, who so changed the course of philosophy that those who preceded him are called Presocratics.
Tradition tells us one way Socrates differed from those predecessors is that he wrote nothing.
Our knowledge of him, therefore, is unavoidably mediated: we know Socrates only through others, three of whom – Aristophanes, Plato, and Xenophon – knew him personally and confront us with differing and potentially unreliable evidence.
Aristophanes is an obvious, if friendly critic, and Plato and Xenophon present themselves as defenders of Socrates.
We might also look to scattered remarks of Aristotle and other Greek authors and to the reports handed down by later generations – Cicero, for instance, and Diogenes Laertius – but discovering the “historical Socrates” has long posed a challenge for scholars.

Related Results

Reading Xenophon's Symposium
Reading Xenophon's Symposium
In just over a decade, interest in Xenophon'sSymposiumhas risen dramatically. No longer the poor relation to its author's more popular Socratic works or to Plato's dialogue of the ...
Virtue in the Cave
Virtue in the Cave
Abstract Offers an interpretation of Plato's Meno that seeks to illuminate the particularly “therapeutic” philosophy that Socrates practices. It argues that the Meno...
HUKUM KEKUAS AAN DAN DEMOKRASI MASA YUNANI KUNO
HUKUM KEKUAS AAN DAN DEMOKRASI MASA YUNANI KUNO
Plato and Aristotle are thinkers on the future of Greece that were raised in the Greek civilization. Aristotle is known as empirical-realist thinkers in contrast to Plato who...
Sokrates og oss: Et essay om Sokrates’ forsvarstale, tekstfortolkning og filosofihistorie
Sokrates og oss: Et essay om Sokrates’ forsvarstale, tekstfortolkning og filosofihistorie
<p><em>Socrates and Us: An Essay on the </em>Apology of Socrates<em>, Philological Interpretations and History of Philosophy. </em>I start out with a ...
Introduction: Speech Bonds
Introduction: Speech Bonds
Jill Frank introduces Berger’s argument by addressing the ethicalities of Plato’s proposed Klinopolis—his “Couch City”—whether it promises to be the good city, the bad city, or per...
Before and after Socrates
Before and after Socrates
In this book, F.M. Cornford explains why the life and work of Socrates stand out as marking a turning-point in the history of thought. He shows how Socrates revolutionized the conc...
Impasse, Paradox, and the Myth of Learning by Recollection
Impasse, Paradox, and the Myth of Learning by Recollection
AbstractHaving failed to produce a satisfactory definition of virtue, Meno suddenly recalls having heard that Socrates is a perplexed man himself who causes perplexity in others. H...
Xenophon (ca. 430–mid‐4th century BCE)
Xenophon (ca. 430–mid‐4th century BCE)
Abstract Xenophon is one of only three authors who actually knew Socrates, the founder of political philosophy, and whose works about him have survived. The ...

Back to Top