Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

An holism solution to reconcile the hard problem of consciousness

View through CrossRef
Natural science is founded on materialism. We treat the independent relationship between inner experience and outer physical entities as an axiom. This cognitive paradigm has successfully explained many natural phenomena; however, certain phenomena, such as those in quantum mechanics and psychological experiments, challenge this view, suggesting the inseparability of the inner and outer. Yet, the inner and outer appear to be distinct categories of existence, and experimental models demonstrating their transformative relationship remain lacking. This has led to issues like the explanatory gap. We propose that adopting holism is a potential solution to reconcile this dilemma: the inner experience can be objectively described and possesses objective causal efficacy. According to holism, objective reality and a causal relationship are not absolute but inseparable from the cognitive perspective. Materialism's view that the inner and outer exist as independent relations is an underlying assumption based on the third-person perspective rather than an axiom. From the third-person perspective, the physical properties of things are described, and we establish a causal relationship confined to spacetime, where things interact through physical medium. This cognitive perspective excels at describing the laws of motion governing simple systems but simultaneously introduces limitations, such as the explanatory gap. From the first-person perspective, the holistic attributes of things can also be objectively described. "Inner" and "outer" can be seen as two different states of experience, and things here interact holistically without a physical medium, forming causality unrestricted by spacetime. This perspective excels at revealing the laws governing complex systems/phenomena and can reconcile the explanatory gap. These two cognitive perspectives, although superficially opposed, are functionally complementary. Therefore, the generalized complementarity principle based on holism provides a falsifiable research approach for the "subjective" interpretation of quantum theory, potentially reconciling the contradictions between quantum theory and relativity. Holism also offers a solution for reconciling divergent viewpoints among consciousness theories, enabling phenomena related to consciousness across multiple disciplines to be explained within a unified theoretical framework. To test these hypotheses, we propose an experimental model to demonstrate that, similar to the role of force that we revealed in the third-person perspective, holistic interaction without a physical medium from the first-person perspective is also an objective way of interaction between things. Under holistic interaction, the inner experience, as a holistic attributes of things, can also produce observable and objective causal efficacy.
Title: An holism solution to reconcile the hard problem of consciousness
Description:
Natural science is founded on materialism.
We treat the independent relationship between inner experience and outer physical entities as an axiom.
This cognitive paradigm has successfully explained many natural phenomena; however, certain phenomena, such as those in quantum mechanics and psychological experiments, challenge this view, suggesting the inseparability of the inner and outer.
Yet, the inner and outer appear to be distinct categories of existence, and experimental models demonstrating their transformative relationship remain lacking.
This has led to issues like the explanatory gap.
We propose that adopting holism is a potential solution to reconcile this dilemma: the inner experience can be objectively described and possesses objective causal efficacy.
According to holism, objective reality and a causal relationship are not absolute but inseparable from the cognitive perspective.
Materialism's view that the inner and outer exist as independent relations is an underlying assumption based on the third-person perspective rather than an axiom.
From the third-person perspective, the physical properties of things are described, and we establish a causal relationship confined to spacetime, where things interact through physical medium.
This cognitive perspective excels at describing the laws of motion governing simple systems but simultaneously introduces limitations, such as the explanatory gap.
From the first-person perspective, the holistic attributes of things can also be objectively described.
"Inner" and "outer" can be seen as two different states of experience, and things here interact holistically without a physical medium, forming causality unrestricted by spacetime.
This perspective excels at revealing the laws governing complex systems/phenomena and can reconcile the explanatory gap.
These two cognitive perspectives, although superficially opposed, are functionally complementary.
Therefore, the generalized complementarity principle based on holism provides a falsifiable research approach for the "subjective" interpretation of quantum theory, potentially reconciling the contradictions between quantum theory and relativity.
Holism also offers a solution for reconciling divergent viewpoints among consciousness theories, enabling phenomena related to consciousness across multiple disciplines to be explained within a unified theoretical framework.
To test these hypotheses, we propose an experimental model to demonstrate that, similar to the role of force that we revealed in the third-person perspective, holistic interaction without a physical medium from the first-person perspective is also an objective way of interaction between things.
Under holistic interaction, the inner experience, as a holistic attributes of things, can also produce observable and objective causal efficacy.

Related Results

Öz Bilinçten Tanrıya
Öz Bilinçten Tanrıya
From Self-Consci̇ȯ usness to God Is Self-Consciousness a Mystery or an Argume rgument for the Existence of God? This study examines theories and arguments concerning self and cons...
Holism
Holism
In ethics, holism is most commonly taken to be the view that moral consideration is owed not only to individuals (e.g., individual people or individual animals) but also and indepe...
Therapeutic Holism
Therapeutic Holism
This chapter historicizes therapeutic holism, the model of literary therapy The Poetics of Palliation challenges. Beyond the faith that literature and its tools can heal, therapeut...
Mind as Activity: Consciousness, Perception, and the Epistemic-Ontological Boundary
Mind as Activity: Consciousness, Perception, and the Epistemic-Ontological Boundary
The nature of consciousness remains a central unresolved problem at the intersection of philosophy of mind, cognitive science, neuroscience, and metaphysics. A common explanatory s...
Consciousness is faster than light
Consciousness is faster than light
Nobody knows exactly how consciousness is produced. To make matters worse, nobody even knows what consciousness is. In this article, I provide insight into what consciousness is, a...
The tension between holism and pluralism: Comment on ‘creative holism’
The tension between holism and pluralism: Comment on ‘creative holism’
AbstractCreative holism of Michael C. Jackson provides an insightful and enlightening research framework in making suitable use of various systems methodologies in combination for ...
Holism and Time Symmetry
Holism and Time Symmetry
Quantum mechanics is often taken to entail holism. I examine the arguments for this claim, and find that although there is no general argument from the structure of quantum mechani...
11. Smuts, Holism, and Political Philosophy
11. Smuts, Holism, and Political Philosophy
After his defeat in the South African parliamentary elections in 1924, Jan Christiaan Smuts briefly ‘retired’ to his farm at Irene where, in an eight-month period, he produced a 35...

Back to Top