Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Band of Brothers: Diocletian and Maximian, Virtutibus Fratres

View through CrossRef
In 285 Diocletian co-opted his general Maximian as co-emperor, but the emperors were not related by blood, and Diocletian did not alleviate this issue by forging a familial bond through marriage or adoption. Rather, the relationship of Diocletian and Maximian was articulated in fraternal terms. This chapter uses various evidence, including the Panegyrici Latini, nomenclature, and images of the Dioscuri, to argue that the emperors themselves promoted the idea that they were brothers, and that the fraternal presentation was designed to appeal to a restless soldiery. The concept of frater defined the close relationships of certain soldiers to one another, and it carried legal weight. In advertising their relationship as a brotherhood, the emperors expressed their close bond to one another and their military background and credentials. The Augusti were not brothers in blood, but commilitones.The presentation also carried with it the notion of equality, which accorded with other representations of parity, and emphasised the imperial message of collegial concordia. The fact that this image of fraternity co-existed and was sometimes even combined with representations of Diocletian’s seniority demonstrates the fluidity of images employed by the Tetrarchs and their subjects in promoting imperial unity.
Title: Band of Brothers: Diocletian and Maximian, Virtutibus Fratres
Description:
In 285 Diocletian co-opted his general Maximian as co-emperor, but the emperors were not related by blood, and Diocletian did not alleviate this issue by forging a familial bond through marriage or adoption.
Rather, the relationship of Diocletian and Maximian was articulated in fraternal terms.
This chapter uses various evidence, including the Panegyrici Latini, nomenclature, and images of the Dioscuri, to argue that the emperors themselves promoted the idea that they were brothers, and that the fraternal presentation was designed to appeal to a restless soldiery.
The concept of frater defined the close relationships of certain soldiers to one another, and it carried legal weight.
In advertising their relationship as a brotherhood, the emperors expressed their close bond to one another and their military background and credentials.
The Augusti were not brothers in blood, but commilitones.
The presentation also carried with it the notion of equality, which accorded with other representations of parity, and emphasised the imperial message of collegial concordia.
The fact that this image of fraternity co-existed and was sometimes even combined with representations of Diocletian’s seniority demonstrates the fluidity of images employed by the Tetrarchs and their subjects in promoting imperial unity.

Related Results

Conclusions: Domus Militaris
Conclusions: Domus Militaris
This chapter summarizes the arguments made in the book. Additionally, it suggests that Diocletian’s military background influenced his decision to abdicate, and it argues that Dioc...
Spin-wave band gaps created by rotating square rods in triangular lattice magnonic crystals
Spin-wave band gaps created by rotating square rods in triangular lattice magnonic crystals
Recently, magnonic crystals which are the magnetic counterparts of photonic crystals or phononic crystals are becoming a hot area of research. In this paper, band structure of two-...
Slaveri hos Tuaregerne i Sahara
Slaveri hos Tuaregerne i Sahara
Slavery among the Tuareg in the SaharaA preliminary analysis of its structure.Slavery is an institution of very considerable age. In Europe and the Orient it has been common for as...
Diocletian, Roman emperor, 284–313 CE
Diocletian, Roman emperor, 284–313 CE
Although not the watershed once considered, it remains justified to treat Diocletian’s reign (284–305 ce) as the beginning of Late Antiquity. Its length allowed for changes to take...
Diocletian vs Heredity: Succession Events and the Soldiery
Diocletian vs Heredity: Succession Events and the Soldiery
This chapter argues that Lactantius’ polemical account of the succession in 305, according to which Galerius pressured Diocletian into abdicating and ignoring the hereditary claims...
Dynastic Politics in the Age of Diocletian, AD 284-311
Dynastic Politics in the Age of Diocletian, AD 284-311
In AD 293 the Roman world was plunged into a bold new experiment in government. Four soldiers shared the empire between them: two senior emperors, Diocletian and Maximian, and two ...
The Legend of Diocletian: “Naming and Framing” Diocletian in Coptic Hagiography
The Legend of Diocletian: “Naming and Framing” Diocletian in Coptic Hagiography
Abstract In the more than seventeen hundred years that passed since he was proclaimed emperor of the Roman Empire, different stories about Diocletian have provided d...
Buchbesprechungen
Buchbesprechungen
Angela Schrott/Christoph Strosetzki (Hgg.): Gelungene Gespräche als Praxis der Gemeinschaftsbildung. Literatur, Sprache und Gesellschaft (Historische Dialogforschung, Band 5), Berl...

Back to Top