Conditions for and potential solutions associated with continuity of care for patients with complex care needs across Swedish regions with differing population densities

Abstract Background This study, conducted across three distinct geographical regions in Sweden, highlights the diverse conditions and challenges in healthcare provision. The study focuses on the sparsely populated northern regions of Sweden, the capital city of Stockholm, and the southeast rural area of Sweden. Each location presents unique obstacles to continuity of care, influenced by factors such as population density and geographical disparities. By examining the experiences of patients with complex care needs, their family carers, and healthcare personnel, this study aims to describe the conditions for and identify potential solutions associated with the delivery of continuity in care in different geographical regions of Sweden, with differing population densities. Method Secondary analysis was conducted using qualitative content analysis on interview data from two studies, consisting of 53 transcripts from individual, pair, and focus group interviews held between August 2018 and November 2019. The potential solutions identified from participants’ experiences were categorized into region-specific and common themes. Three personas—Vera, Bo, and Inga—were developed, each representing a scenario based on the region-specific analyses. Results Despite regional differences, universal solutions to common challenges were identified focusing on relational, management, and informational aspects. Common key obstacles to continuity of care included resource shortages, insufficient information transfer, and privacy regulations. Possible solutions for overcoming these challenges include prioritizing relational continuity, streamlining processes, and advocating for a unified communication system. By collaborating, building trust, understanding patient preferences, and ensuring clear communication, healthcare personnel can effectively promote continuity of care. Conclusions Building a stable workforce while prioritizing relational continuity, along with patients’ preferences and needs, is essential for ensuring continuity of care from multiple providers. Digital solutions can enhance collaboration across distances, while coordinating responsibilities within smaller geographical areas can strengthen partnerships among healthcare organizations. Direct dialogue, along with ensuring that everyone has access to relevant information through a unified communication system, is vital for management continuity. By integrating these universal and transferable solutions to the obstacles associated with continuity of care, we can create a cohesive care experience for patients, regardless of geographical and demographic conditions.