Retropubic versus perineal radical prostatectomy in early prostate cancer: Eight‐year experience

AbstractBackgroundProstate cancer is the most common malignancy in men and the second leading cause of cancer death. A randomized study was performed on patients with localized prostate cancer and treated with radical prostatectomy using the perineal or the retropubic approach comparing oncological outcomes, cancer control, and functional results.Study DesignBetween 1997 and 2004, in a randomized study 200 patients underwent a radical prostatectomy performed by retropubic (100 patients) or perineal (100 patients) approach.ResultsDifferences between hospital stay, duration of catheter drainage, intraoperative blood loss, and transfusion requirements were statistically significant in favor of perineal prostatectomy. Differences between positive surgical margins and urinary continence in the two groups were not statistically significant at 6 and 24 months. Differences between erectile function at 24 months were statistically significant in favor of retropubic prostatectomy.ConclusionsRadical perineal prostatectomy is an excellent alternative approach for radical surgery in the treatment of early prostate cancer. J. Surg. Oncol. 2007; 95: 513–518. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.