Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Mixed Method Religion

View through CrossRef
We explore how Christians and Buddhists, of different religiosity, react to death within the context of the Covid-19 pandemic. Previous research has found that the interaction between cultural level, individual level and situational level factors are necessary to consider for a more comprehensive grasp of a phenomenon. We look at how Religion x Religiosity x Threat of Covid interact and show different relationships between these variables and dehumanization. We find that at higher levels of disruption by Covid-19 on religious practice (but not lower levels), Christians high on extrinsic religiosity (but low on intrinsic religiosity) dehumanized religious outgroups the most, whereas Christians high on extrinsic and high on intrinsic religiosity dehumanized religious outgroups significantly less. At low levels of impact of Covid-19 on religious practice, only higher levels of extrinsic religiosity were related to higher levels of dehumanization. Buddhists, regardless of level of religiosity and impact of Covid-19 to religious practice, consistently showed a relatively low level of dehumanization against religious outgroups. Findings are triangulated through multiple sources of data and further elaborated through qualitative coding of open-ended responses. These enactment patterns contribute to the religion and terror management literature and offer insights for potentially developing inclusive understanding with outgroup members.
Title: Mixed Method Religion
Description:
We explore how Christians and Buddhists, of different religiosity, react to death within the context of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Previous research has found that the interaction between cultural level, individual level and situational level factors are necessary to consider for a more comprehensive grasp of a phenomenon.
We look at how Religion x Religiosity x Threat of Covid interact and show different relationships between these variables and dehumanization.
We find that at higher levels of disruption by Covid-19 on religious practice (but not lower levels), Christians high on extrinsic religiosity (but low on intrinsic religiosity) dehumanized religious outgroups the most, whereas Christians high on extrinsic and high on intrinsic religiosity dehumanized religious outgroups significantly less.
At low levels of impact of Covid-19 on religious practice, only higher levels of extrinsic religiosity were related to higher levels of dehumanization.
Buddhists, regardless of level of religiosity and impact of Covid-19 to religious practice, consistently showed a relatively low level of dehumanization against religious outgroups.
Findings are triangulated through multiple sources of data and further elaborated through qualitative coding of open-ended responses.
These enactment patterns contribute to the religion and terror management literature and offer insights for potentially developing inclusive understanding with outgroup members.

Related Results

Mehmet S. Aydın’da Din Felsefesi
Mehmet S. Aydın’da Din Felsefesi
Philosophy of religion is a field that studies religious issues from a philosophical point of view. Mehmet S. Aydın, who wrote the most widely read work in the field of philosophy ...
Država, crkva i sloboda veroispovesti
Država, crkva i sloboda veroispovesti
State, church and freedom of religion are undeniably among the most important matters of the society, without which one cannot imagine modern life. The relationship between the sta...
Review Essays
Review Essays
Book reviewed in this article:HOMOSEXUALITY, QUEER THEORY, AND CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY: THE LESBIAN AND GAY STUDIES READER Edited by Henry Abe love, Michèle Aina Barale, and David M. Ha...
Religion, New Media, and Digital Culture
Religion, New Media, and Digital Culture
The study of religion and new media explores how the contemporary proliferation of technological devices and digital culture impacts religious traditions. The progressive mediation...
Should the State Still Protect Religion qua Religion? John Finnis Between Brian Leiter and the “Second Wave” in Law and Religion
Should the State Still Protect Religion qua Religion? John Finnis Between Brian Leiter and the “Second Wave” in Law and Religion
This article offers a Thomist response to Brian Leiter’s Why Tolerate Religion?, challenging his claim that religion does not merit distinct legal protection. While Leiter assumes ...
Philosophy of (Lived) Religion
Philosophy of (Lived) Religion
The cohabitation of philosophy with the study of religion has such a long history that we have not been motivated to consider the terms of that relationship. This paper proposes th...
Ibn Khaldun’s Thoughts on Religion as A Personal Experience and A Social System
Ibn Khaldun’s Thoughts on Religion as A Personal Experience and A Social System
Dialogue and discussion about religion requires a cautious attitude. Because even though religion has a social function, its appreciation is very individual. Religion is the deepes...
The Establishment Clause After <i>Kennedy</i>: Principles and Applications
The Establishment Clause After <i>Kennedy</i>: Principles and Applications
<div> In <i>Bremerton v. Kennedy</i>, the Supreme Court appears to have fully rejected its “<i>Lemon</i> test” for interpreting the Establishment Cla...

Back to Top