Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Optimising grass-legume mixtures based on growth strategies for high N-yield and low N loss in fertilised grasslands

View through CrossRef
Abstract Aims Managed grasslands are important agro-ecosystems, consisting of grass monocultures with high nitrogen (N) fertiliser inputs. This management results in low N use efficiency and high N losses to the environment. Growing mixtures of plant species with diverse N acquisition strategies can reduce N losses and maintain high grassland productivity, yet determining the best mixture remains a challenge. The aim of this study was to investigate how grass-legume mixtures with contrasting growth strategies affect plant productivity, N use efficiency, N uptake, and soil mineral N, and how these effects depend on the N-fertilisation level. Methods Two complementing field experiments were established: the first determined how monocultures and mixtures (two and four grass-legume mixtures) with contrasting growth strategies (fast- vs. slow-growing) affect productivity and N-cycling. The second determined the effect of fertilisation level on productivity and N-cycling in monocultures and two-species mixtures. Results We found that productivity and N uptake of the four-species mixture was as high as the most productive monoculture and two-species mixtures. This was associated with an increase in legume N fixation and high N use efficiency of the plant community. Fast-growing grass and legume combination increased productivity and reduced soil mineral N, thus reducing the risk of N loss at both N-fertilisation levels, while combining a fast-growing grass with a slow-growing legume promoted high legume N fixation under low N-fertilisation. Conclusions This study shows that productivity and N-cycling decreases via complementarity effects when growing mixtures of fast- and slow-growing grasses and a fast-growing legume at moderate level of N-fertilisation.
Title: Optimising grass-legume mixtures based on growth strategies for high N-yield and low N loss in fertilised grasslands
Description:
Abstract Aims Managed grasslands are important agro-ecosystems, consisting of grass monocultures with high nitrogen (N) fertiliser inputs.
This management results in low N use efficiency and high N losses to the environment.
Growing mixtures of plant species with diverse N acquisition strategies can reduce N losses and maintain high grassland productivity, yet determining the best mixture remains a challenge.
The aim of this study was to investigate how grass-legume mixtures with contrasting growth strategies affect plant productivity, N use efficiency, N uptake, and soil mineral N, and how these effects depend on the N-fertilisation level.
Methods Two complementing field experiments were established: the first determined how monocultures and mixtures (two and four grass-legume mixtures) with contrasting growth strategies (fast- vs.
slow-growing) affect productivity and N-cycling.
The second determined the effect of fertilisation level on productivity and N-cycling in monocultures and two-species mixtures.
Results We found that productivity and N uptake of the four-species mixture was as high as the most productive monoculture and two-species mixtures.
This was associated with an increase in legume N fixation and high N use efficiency of the plant community.
Fast-growing grass and legume combination increased productivity and reduced soil mineral N, thus reducing the risk of N loss at both N-fertilisation levels, while combining a fast-growing grass with a slow-growing legume promoted high legume N fixation under low N-fertilisation.
Conclusions This study shows that productivity and N-cycling decreases via complementarity effects when growing mixtures of fast- and slow-growing grasses and a fast-growing legume at moderate level of N-fertilisation.

Related Results

Optimising grass-legume mixtures based on growth strategies for high N-yield and low N-loss in fertilised grasslands
Optimising grass-legume mixtures based on growth strategies for high N-yield and low N-loss in fertilised grasslands
Abstract Aims: Managed grasslands are important agro-ecosystems, consisting of grass monocultures with high nitrogen (N) fertiliser inputs. This management results in low N...
Evaluation of dryland forage species for lowland Marlborough and 'Mid Canterbury
Evaluation of dryland forage species for lowland Marlborough and 'Mid Canterbury
Grazing trials were established at Dashwood, Marlborough and at Winchmore Research Station, Mid Canterbury, to determine persistence, production patterns and changes in composition...
The effects of temporal continuities of grasslands on the diversity and species composition of plants
The effects of temporal continuities of grasslands on the diversity and species composition of plants
AbstractSemi-natural grasslands are ecosystems rich in biodiversity. However, their decline has been reported worldwide, and identification of grasslands with high conservation pri...
Competitive Indices in Cereal and Legume Mixtures in a South Asian Environment
Competitive Indices in Cereal and Legume Mixtures in a South Asian Environment
Core Ideas Cereal‐legume binary mixtures increased forage productivity per unit area compared to cereal‐cereal and legume‐legume binary mixtures. In binary mixtures, pearl millet w...
Effects of grassland duration on butterfly communities and its relevance to grassland area
Effects of grassland duration on butterfly communities and its relevance to grassland area
Abstract Semi-natural grasslands, renowned for their rich biodiversity, are experiencing global decline, necessitating urgent conservation prioritization. Recently, researc...
Mechanical and biotic strategies for post-mine reclaimed grasslands
Mechanical and biotic strategies for post-mine reclaimed grasslands
Global energy production is in high demand and is expanding its development into new landscapes, including grasslands. This expansion has intensive impacts on above and belowground...

Back to Top