Javascript must be enabled to continue!
7 December 1916: Asquith, Lloyd George and the Crisis of Liberalism
View through CrossRef
AbstractOn 7 December 1916, in a dramatic coup, Lloyd George supplanted Asquith and became prime minister. This marked the death of a great party and has generated huge controversy. For long, Lloyd George was condemned as the culprit but latterly his reputation has risen sharply. Asquith and Lloyd George came from very different wings of the party, imperialist and Little Englander. Asquith seemed the supreme insider, Lloyd George a supreme Welsh outsider. However in peacetime government, they formed a tremendous partnership. Their close association continued to the formation of the first coalition in May 1915. Then serious division came over military conscription, with Lloyd George moving towards his old foes, the Unionists. As minister for munitions, then secretary for war, he became publicly very critical of the conduct of the war. A great conflict arose over his demand for a new war committee. This was directed against the generals: he did not wish to become prime minister. It looked as if a compromise was possible. On 3 December 1916 Asquith agreed to such a committee but, fatally, reversed his view the next day, Crucial was his misjudgment of the Unionist leaders, especially Balfour. On 6 December the king asked Lloyd George to form a government. Asquith seriously exaggerated his own strength while Lloyd George now had growing Unionist support, the backing of Labour and of a majority of Liberal MPs mobilised by Addison. So Asquith fell and a governmental revolution followed – a new small war cabinet, a cabinet secretariat under Hankey, a secretariat of private advisors in the ‘Garden Suburb’ and an inexorable move towards prime ministerial (or quasi‐presidential) government. In May 1918, the ‘Maurice debate’ saw the Liberals divided into pro‐ and anti‐government factions; they were crushed at the subsequent general election. The party was thereafter haunted by December 1916 and responsibility was bitterly contested. Yet it should be remembered that before 7 December 1916, the two Liberal leaders formed a dynamic and commanding partnership, which changed British politics profoundly and irreversibly.
Title: 7 December 1916: Asquith, Lloyd George and the Crisis of Liberalism
Description:
AbstractOn 7 December 1916, in a dramatic coup, Lloyd George supplanted Asquith and became prime minister.
This marked the death of a great party and has generated huge controversy.
For long, Lloyd George was condemned as the culprit but latterly his reputation has risen sharply.
Asquith and Lloyd George came from very different wings of the party, imperialist and Little Englander.
Asquith seemed the supreme insider, Lloyd George a supreme Welsh outsider.
However in peacetime government, they formed a tremendous partnership.
Their close association continued to the formation of the first coalition in May 1915.
Then serious division came over military conscription, with Lloyd George moving towards his old foes, the Unionists.
As minister for munitions, then secretary for war, he became publicly very critical of the conduct of the war.
A great conflict arose over his demand for a new war committee.
This was directed against the generals: he did not wish to become prime minister.
It looked as if a compromise was possible.
On 3 December 1916 Asquith agreed to such a committee but, fatally, reversed his view the next day, Crucial was his misjudgment of the Unionist leaders, especially Balfour.
On 6 December the king asked Lloyd George to form a government.
Asquith seriously exaggerated his own strength while Lloyd George now had growing Unionist support, the backing of Labour and of a majority of Liberal MPs mobilised by Addison.
So Asquith fell and a governmental revolution followed – a new small war cabinet, a cabinet secretariat under Hankey, a secretariat of private advisors in the ‘Garden Suburb’ and an inexorable move towards prime ministerial (or quasi‐presidential) government.
In May 1918, the ‘Maurice debate’ saw the Liberals divided into pro‐ and anti‐government factions; they were crushed at the subsequent general election.
The party was thereafter haunted by December 1916 and responsibility was bitterly contested.
Yet it should be remembered that before 7 December 1916, the two Liberal leaders formed a dynamic and commanding partnership, which changed British politics profoundly and irreversibly.
Related Results
Liberalism of the Third Force in Republican China: Carsun Chang and Zhang Dongsun
Liberalism of the Third Force in Republican China: Carsun Chang and Zhang Dongsun
<p>This study investigates the liberal thought of Carsun Chang and Zhang Dongsun who were core figures of the “Third Force”, those parties who did not align themselves either...
Anthropology of Liberalism
Anthropology of Liberalism
Anthropology has long had a love-hate relationship to liberalism. As the disciplinary proponents of other cultures’ dignity, anthropologists laid the groundwork for multiculturalis...
Change or paradox: the double-edged sword effect of organizational crisis on employee behavior
Change or paradox: the double-edged sword effect of organizational crisis on employee behavior
PurposeBased on cognitive appraisal theory of stress, this study develops an integrated model to examine the double-edged sword effect and boundary conditions of the impact of orga...
Liberalism from the Perspective of Islamic Education and Its Implications for the National Education System
Liberalism from the Perspective of Islamic Education and Its Implications for the National Education System
Objective: This study aims to analyze the influence of liberalism principles from the perspective of Islamic education and its implications on the national education system in Indo...
Liberalism Philosophy Influence in Islamic Social Movements in Malaysia
Liberalism Philosophy Influence in Islamic Social Movements in Malaysia
This article focuses on the early development of evolution and the development of liberalism specifically in Malaysia since it was brought by the western colonists to form a social...
The Great War: Tragedy and Triumph, 1916-1918
The Great War: Tragedy and Triumph, 1916-1918
Abstract
Lloyd George, his hand strengthened by his powers of patronage, managed to form a ministry with surprising ease. The much-criticized Balfour, who had ear...
Management of Crisis Communications in the Public Space
Management of Crisis Communications in the Public Space
<p><strong><em>Purpose. </em></strong><em>Analysis and systematization of objective conditions that determine the content of modern crisis commu...
Crisis consultations as a component of political management
Crisis consultations as a component of political management
It is determined that crisis consultations represent a set of measures aimed at stabilizing the situation of a particular subject, solving a set of problems associated with the max...

