Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Dynamic Systematic Benefit Risk Analysis of Antiviral Drug Combination of Lopinavir - Ritonavir for Covid-19 Patient
View through CrossRef
High-risk patients with early symptomatic COVID-19 in an outpatient setting. Lopinavir/ritonavir and arbidol have been previously used to treat acute respiratory syndrome- coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replication in clinical practice; nevertheless, their effectiveness remains controversial. In this study, we evaluated the antiviral effects and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir and arbidol in patients with the 2019-nCoV disease (COVID-19). Fifty patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were divided into two groups: including lopinavir/ritonavir group (34 cases) and arbidol group (16 cases). Lopinavir/ritonavir group received 400 mg/100mg of Lopinavir/ritonavir, twice a day for a week, while the arbidol group was given 0.2 g arbidol, three times a day. Data from these patients were retrospectively analyzed. The cycle threshold values of open reading frame 1ab and nucleocapsid genes by RT-PCR assay were monitored during antiviral therapy. None of the patients developed severe pneumonia or ARDS. There was no difference in fever duration between the two groups (P=0.61). On day 14 after the admission, no viral load was detected in arbidol group, but the viral load was found in 15(44.1%) patients treated with lopinavir/ritonavir. Patients in the arbidol group had a shorter duration of positive RNA test compared to those in the lopinavir/ritonavir group (P<0.01). Moreover, no apparent side effects were found in both groups. In conclusion, our data indicate that arbidol monotherapy may be superior to lopinavir/ritonavir in treating COVID-19.
Title: Dynamic Systematic Benefit Risk Analysis of Antiviral Drug Combination of Lopinavir - Ritonavir for Covid-19 Patient
Description:
High-risk patients with early symptomatic COVID-19 in an outpatient setting.
Lopinavir/ritonavir and arbidol have been previously used to treat acute respiratory syndrome- coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replication in clinical practice; nevertheless, their effectiveness remains controversial.
In this study, we evaluated the antiviral effects and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir and arbidol in patients with the 2019-nCoV disease (COVID-19).
Fifty patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were divided into two groups: including lopinavir/ritonavir group (34 cases) and arbidol group (16 cases).
Lopinavir/ritonavir group received 400 mg/100mg of Lopinavir/ritonavir, twice a day for a week, while the arbidol group was given 0.
2 g arbidol, three times a day.
Data from these patients were retrospectively analyzed.
The cycle threshold values of open reading frame 1ab and nucleocapsid genes by RT-PCR assay were monitored during antiviral therapy.
None of the patients developed severe pneumonia or ARDS.
There was no difference in fever duration between the two groups (P=0.
61).
On day 14 after the admission, no viral load was detected in arbidol group, but the viral load was found in 15(44.
1%) patients treated with lopinavir/ritonavir.
Patients in the arbidol group had a shorter duration of positive RNA test compared to those in the lopinavir/ritonavir group (P<0.
01).
Moreover, no apparent side effects were found in both groups.
In conclusion, our data indicate that arbidol monotherapy may be superior to lopinavir/ritonavir in treating COVID-19.
Related Results
Population pharmacokinetics of ritonavir as a booster of lopinavir, atazanavir, or darunavir in African children with HIV
Population pharmacokinetics of ritonavir as a booster of lopinavir, atazanavir, or darunavir in African children with HIV
ABSTRACT
Ritonavir is important in antiretroviral therapy (ART) because it is used to
boost the ...
Lopinavir/Ritonavir for COVID-19: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Lopinavir/Ritonavir for COVID-19: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Purpose: To provide the latest evidence on the efficacy and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir compared to other treatment options for COVID-19. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochran Lib...
Antiviral efficacy of oral ensitrelvir versus oral ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir in COVID-19
Antiviral efficacy of oral ensitrelvir versus oral ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir in COVID-19
Abstract
Background
Ensitrelvir is an oral antiviral treatment for COVID-19 with the same molecular target as ritonavir-boosted...
The Potential of Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds in the Fight Against COVID-19
The Potential of Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds in the Fight Against COVID-19
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a novel coronavirus , is causing a serious worldwide COVID-19 pandemic. The emergence of strains with rapid spread and...
The HIV-Protease Inhibitor Ritonavir(Norvir®) Is Active Against Human AML Blasts In Vitro and In Vivo and Has Synergistic Cytotoxic Activity with the Proteaseome Inhibitor Bortezomib (Velcade®).
The HIV-Protease Inhibitor Ritonavir(Norvir®) Is Active Against Human AML Blasts In Vitro and In Vivo and Has Synergistic Cytotoxic Activity with the Proteaseome Inhibitor Bortezomib (Velcade®).
Abstract
Upregulation of alternative proteolytic pathways characterizes malignant cells that overcome proteasome inhibition in vitro. The proteasome inhibitor Bortez...
Lopinavir Up-Regulates Expression of the Antiviral Protein Ribonuclease L in Human Papillomavirus-Positive Cervical Carcinoma Cells
Lopinavir Up-Regulates Expression of the Antiviral Protein Ribonuclease L in Human Papillomavirus-Positive Cervical Carcinoma Cells
Background
We have previously shown that the HIV protease inhibitor lopinavir has selective toxicity against human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive cervical carcin...
Infusion therapy for cardiovascular diseases: the allowed limits
Infusion therapy for cardiovascular diseases: the allowed limits
Background. Analysis of the mortality structure of patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) had found that 69.2 % of non-survivors had hypertension. Comorbid diabetes mellitus ...

