Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Dynamic Systematic Benefit Risk Analysis of Antiviral Drug Combination of Lopinavir - Ritonavir for Covid-19 Patient
View through CrossRef
High-risk patients with early symptomatic COVID-19 in an outpatient setting. Lopinavir/ritonavir and arbidol have been previously used to treat acute respiratory syndrome- coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replication in clinical practice; nevertheless, their effectiveness remains controversial. In this study, we evaluated the antiviral effects and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir and arbidol in patients with the 2019-nCoV disease (COVID-19). Fifty patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were divided into two groups: including lopinavir/ritonavir group (34 cases) and arbidol group (16 cases). Lopinavir/ritonavir group received 400 mg/100mg of Lopinavir/ritonavir, twice a day for a week, while the arbidol group was given 0.2 g arbidol, three times a day. Data from these patients were retrospectively analyzed. The cycle threshold values of open reading frame 1ab and nucleocapsid genes by RT-PCR assay were monitored during antiviral therapy. None of the patients developed severe pneumonia or ARDS. There was no difference in fever duration between the two groups (P=0.61). On day 14 after the admission, no viral load was detected in arbidol group, but the viral load was found in 15(44.1%) patients treated with lopinavir/ritonavir. Patients in the arbidol group had a shorter duration of positive RNA test compared to those in the lopinavir/ritonavir group (P<0.01). Moreover, no apparent side effects were found in both groups. In conclusion, our data indicate that arbidol monotherapy may be superior to lopinavir/ritonavir in treating COVID-19.
Title: Dynamic Systematic Benefit Risk Analysis of Antiviral Drug Combination of Lopinavir - Ritonavir for Covid-19 Patient
Description:
High-risk patients with early symptomatic COVID-19 in an outpatient setting.
Lopinavir/ritonavir and arbidol have been previously used to treat acute respiratory syndrome- coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replication in clinical practice; nevertheless, their effectiveness remains controversial.
In this study, we evaluated the antiviral effects and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir and arbidol in patients with the 2019-nCoV disease (COVID-19).
Fifty patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were divided into two groups: including lopinavir/ritonavir group (34 cases) and arbidol group (16 cases).
Lopinavir/ritonavir group received 400 mg/100mg of Lopinavir/ritonavir, twice a day for a week, while the arbidol group was given 0.
2 g arbidol, three times a day.
Data from these patients were retrospectively analyzed.
The cycle threshold values of open reading frame 1ab and nucleocapsid genes by RT-PCR assay were monitored during antiviral therapy.
None of the patients developed severe pneumonia or ARDS.
There was no difference in fever duration between the two groups (P=0.
61).
On day 14 after the admission, no viral load was detected in arbidol group, but the viral load was found in 15(44.
1%) patients treated with lopinavir/ritonavir.
Patients in the arbidol group had a shorter duration of positive RNA test compared to those in the lopinavir/ritonavir group (P<0.
01).
Moreover, no apparent side effects were found in both groups.
In conclusion, our data indicate that arbidol monotherapy may be superior to lopinavir/ritonavir in treating COVID-19.
Related Results
Lopinavir/Ritonavir for COVID-19: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Lopinavir/Ritonavir for COVID-19: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Purpose: To provide the latest evidence on the efficacy and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir compared to other treatment options for COVID-19. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochran Lib...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Infusion therapy for cardiovascular diseases: the allowed limits
Infusion therapy for cardiovascular diseases: the allowed limits
Background. Analysis of the mortality structure of patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) had found that 69.2 % of non-survivors had hypertension. Comorbid diabetes mellitus ...
Impact of extended-course oral nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) in established Long COVID: Case series and research considerations
Impact of extended-course oral nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) in established Long COVID: Case series and research considerations
AbstractBackground: Prior case series suggest that a 5-day course of oral Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) benefits some people with Long COVID, within and/or outside of the conte...
Network controllability analysis reveals the antiviral potential of Etravirine against Hepatitis E Virus infection
Network controllability analysis reveals the antiviral potential of Etravirine against Hepatitis E Virus infection
AbstractHepatitis E virus (HEV) is a major cause of acute viral hepatitis in lower- and middle-income countries. HEV infection may lead to acute liver failure, chronic liver diseas...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Molecular docking analysis of repurposed HIV and antiviral drugs against monkeypox target protein: evaluating docking scores and hydrogen bond interactions
Molecular docking analysis of repurposed HIV and antiviral drugs against monkeypox target protein: evaluating docking scores and hydrogen bond interactions
The rising threat of monkeypox has driven efforts to repurpose existing HIV and antiviral drugs using in silico molecular docking for cost-effective and rapid drug discovery. This ...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...

