Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

(038) Health-Related Quality of Life after Gender-Affirming Pelvic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

View through CrossRef
Abstract Introduction Various validated questionnaires have been designed to evaluate sexual dysfunction as it relates to specific phases of the sexual response cycle, which include desire, arousal, orgasm, and resolution. Although there is a breadth of data on the surgical and aesthetic outcomes of patients who have undergone gender-affirming pelvic surgery (GAPS), there are limited data on sexual outcomes as they relate to the sexual response cycle after GAPS. Questionnaires are a crucial tool for research and clinical assessment of sexual dysfunction. However, many of the validated questionnaires for sexual dysfunction were not created for use in transgender patients after GAPS. To date, there is not a validated questionnaire specifically for patients who have undergone GAPS. Objective We sought to review the most commonly used sexual function questionnaires and assess their inclusivity as it relates to transgender patients who have undergone GAPS. Methods A PubMed and PsycINFO search was carried out using the keywords: “Validated questionnaires” AND “sexual dysfunction” OR “arousal” OR “desire” OR “libido” OR “satisfaction” OR “quality of life”. We then reviewed the most commonly used validated sexual dysfunction questionnaires and graded them on the metrics of medical applicability of patients who had undergone vaginoplasty, metoidioplasty, or phalloplasty, affirming language, and inclusion of identities beyond fully binary transgender people. The validated questionaries were reviewed by a comprehensive sexual health expert and a gender-affirming surgeon. Results Of the 13 questionnaires reviewed, only 5 met all metrics for inclusiveness. 4/13 of the validated questionnaires used exclusionary gendered language (female vs male), 6/13 were not physiologically applicable to patients who had undergone GAS (vaginal lubrication, ejaculation etc) and 2/13 assumed heterosexual orientation. Conclusions The current clinical and research tools used to define sexual dysfunction are not inclusive of people who have undergone gender-affirming surgery. Validated questionnaires are needed to optimally assess the sexual outcomes of patients who have undergone GAS. Disclosure No.
Title: (038) Health-Related Quality of Life after Gender-Affirming Pelvic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Description:
Abstract Introduction Various validated questionnaires have been designed to evaluate sexual dysfunction as it relates to specific phases of the sexual response cycle, which include desire, arousal, orgasm, and resolution.
Although there is a breadth of data on the surgical and aesthetic outcomes of patients who have undergone gender-affirming pelvic surgery (GAPS), there are limited data on sexual outcomes as they relate to the sexual response cycle after GAPS.
Questionnaires are a crucial tool for research and clinical assessment of sexual dysfunction.
However, many of the validated questionnaires for sexual dysfunction were not created for use in transgender patients after GAPS.
To date, there is not a validated questionnaire specifically for patients who have undergone GAPS.
Objective We sought to review the most commonly used sexual function questionnaires and assess their inclusivity as it relates to transgender patients who have undergone GAPS.
Methods A PubMed and PsycINFO search was carried out using the keywords: “Validated questionnaires” AND “sexual dysfunction” OR “arousal” OR “desire” OR “libido” OR “satisfaction” OR “quality of life”.
We then reviewed the most commonly used validated sexual dysfunction questionnaires and graded them on the metrics of medical applicability of patients who had undergone vaginoplasty, metoidioplasty, or phalloplasty, affirming language, and inclusion of identities beyond fully binary transgender people.
The validated questionaries were reviewed by a comprehensive sexual health expert and a gender-affirming surgeon.
Results Of the 13 questionnaires reviewed, only 5 met all metrics for inclusiveness.
4/13 of the validated questionnaires used exclusionary gendered language (female vs male), 6/13 were not physiologically applicable to patients who had undergone GAS (vaginal lubrication, ejaculation etc) and 2/13 assumed heterosexual orientation.
Conclusions The current clinical and research tools used to define sexual dysfunction are not inclusive of people who have undergone gender-affirming surgery.
Validated questionnaires are needed to optimally assess the sexual outcomes of patients who have undergone GAS.
Disclosure No.

Related Results

Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
(087) Why Should Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy be Included in Treatment of Vestibulodynia?
(087) Why Should Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy be Included in Treatment of Vestibulodynia?
Abstract Introduction Vestibulodynia, vulvar pain localized to the vestibule without an identifiable cause, has a multifactorial...
Evaluasi KIPPas (Kartu Instrumen Prediktor Pangastuti) Jogja sebagai Instrumen Prediktor Disfungsi Dasar Panggul Pasca Persalinan Vaginal
Evaluasi KIPPas (Kartu Instrumen Prediktor Pangastuti) Jogja sebagai Instrumen Prediktor Disfungsi Dasar Panggul Pasca Persalinan Vaginal
Background: Postpartum pelvic floor dysfunction is pelvic floor disorder, which can be in the form of pelvic organ prolapse, urinary problem, defecation problem or sexual dysfuncti...
Pain Catastrophizing and Impact on Pelvic Floor Surgery Experience
Pain Catastrophizing and Impact on Pelvic Floor Surgery Experience
ABSTRACT Duration, intensity, and management of pain and discomfort may all be affected by experience, personality, and medical and psychosocial comorbidities. A negative...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...

Back to Top