Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Infusing Safety: Comparing Oncology Infusion Outcomes at Home Infusion Services vs. Hospital-Based Outpatient Infusion Centers

View through CrossRef
Background Oncology infusions are a cornerstone of cancer treatment, often administered in hospitalbased outpatient departments (HOPDs) due to the controlled environment they offer. However, with the rise of patient-centered care and cost reduction efforts, home infusion services are an increasingly viable alternative for oncology treatments, though some professional groups have concerns about safety. To address these concerns, this study compares safety outcomes of oncology infusions administered through home infusion (HI) to those administered in HOPDs. Methods This retrospective study analyzed data from adult oncology patients who received infusion therapies between January 2020 and December 2023 through HI or HOPDs within a single health system. Primary outcomes included infusion-related reactions (IRRs), all-cause acute care visits within 48-hours, and respiratory infection (influenza, COVID-19, RSV) rates within 14-days following infusions. Chi-square tests compared patient characteristics and infusion outcomes by site of care. Results There were 3,084 patients (38,052 infusions) treated in HOPDs and 145 patients (1,242 infusions) treated through HI; 93 (3.0%) patients were treated at both sites. Patients receiving HI were younger (Under 50 years: HI: 36 (69.2%) vs. HOPD: 486 (16.2%), p < 0.0001) and more likely to be female (HI: 34 (65.4%) vs. HOPD: 1,723 (57.4%), p = 0.049). Rates of IRRs and acute care utilization were similar following infusions at both sites of care (IRRs: HI: 0.16% vs. HOPD: 0.19%, p = 0.81; Acute care visits: HI: 1.4% vs. HOPD: 1.2%, p = 0.47). There were fewer respiratory infections reported following HIs compared to HOPD infusions (HI: 0 (0.0%) vs. HOPD: 144 (0.38%), p = 0.029). Conclusion These findings indicate that oncology infusions occurring within HI result in safety outcomes comparable to HOPDs; further, there were fewer respiratory infections, which can be life-threatening among oncology patients, following HI. Home infusion has the potential to enhance patient-centered care and maintain high safety standards, while also providing comfortable, convenient therapy for patients. This knowledge may aid oncologists in making informed and personalized decisions with their patients regarding site of care and resource allocation.
Title: Infusing Safety: Comparing Oncology Infusion Outcomes at Home Infusion Services vs. Hospital-Based Outpatient Infusion Centers
Description:
Background Oncology infusions are a cornerstone of cancer treatment, often administered in hospitalbased outpatient departments (HOPDs) due to the controlled environment they offer.
However, with the rise of patient-centered care and cost reduction efforts, home infusion services are an increasingly viable alternative for oncology treatments, though some professional groups have concerns about safety.
To address these concerns, this study compares safety outcomes of oncology infusions administered through home infusion (HI) to those administered in HOPDs.
Methods This retrospective study analyzed data from adult oncology patients who received infusion therapies between January 2020 and December 2023 through HI or HOPDs within a single health system.
Primary outcomes included infusion-related reactions (IRRs), all-cause acute care visits within 48-hours, and respiratory infection (influenza, COVID-19, RSV) rates within 14-days following infusions.
Chi-square tests compared patient characteristics and infusion outcomes by site of care.
Results There were 3,084 patients (38,052 infusions) treated in HOPDs and 145 patients (1,242 infusions) treated through HI; 93 (3.
0%) patients were treated at both sites.
Patients receiving HI were younger (Under 50 years: HI: 36 (69.
2%) vs.
HOPD: 486 (16.
2%), p < 0.
0001) and more likely to be female (HI: 34 (65.
4%) vs.
HOPD: 1,723 (57.
4%), p = 0.
049).
Rates of IRRs and acute care utilization were similar following infusions at both sites of care (IRRs: HI: 0.
16% vs.
HOPD: 0.
19%, p = 0.
81; Acute care visits: HI: 1.
4% vs.
HOPD: 1.
2%, p = 0.
47).
There were fewer respiratory infections reported following HIs compared to HOPD infusions (HI: 0 (0.
0%) vs.
HOPD: 144 (0.
38%), p = 0.
029).
Conclusion These findings indicate that oncology infusions occurring within HI result in safety outcomes comparable to HOPDs; further, there were fewer respiratory infections, which can be life-threatening among oncology patients, following HI.
Home infusion has the potential to enhance patient-centered care and maintain high safety standards, while also providing comfortable, convenient therapy for patients.
This knowledge may aid oncologists in making informed and personalized decisions with their patients regarding site of care and resource allocation.

Related Results

Prostor doma u hrvatskim igranim filmovima s temom domovinskog rata
Prostor doma u hrvatskim igranim filmovima s temom domovinskog rata
The dissertation explores the formation of domestic space in contemporary Croatian society through its presentations in the medium of feature films. The cinematic domestic spaces a...
A Multi-Center Study of Home Infusion Services in Rural Areas
A Multi-Center Study of Home Infusion Services in Rural Areas
Introduction: Approximately 15% of the U.S. population lives in rural areas. It is recognized that rural Americans have fewer health care opportunities when compared to metropolita...
A Multi-Center Time Study of Home Infusion Pharmacist Professional Services for Specialty Infusion Medications
A Multi-Center Time Study of Home Infusion Pharmacist Professional Services for Specialty Infusion Medications
Introduction Specialty infusion and injection medications are key growth areas in home infusion services. According to the National Home Infusion Association (NHIA), over 315,000 s...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract Introduction Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Everyday Life in the "Tourist Zone"
Everyday Life in the "Tourist Zone"
This article makes a case for the everyday while on tour and argues that the ability to continue with everyday routines and social relationships, while at the same time moving thro...
Pattern of Outpatient Health Service Utilization by Older People in Iran
Pattern of Outpatient Health Service Utilization by Older People in Iran
Objectives: Considering the rapid growth of Iran’s elderly population with consequent increase in the costs of health services, it is necessary to be aware of the pattern of outpat...
Evaluating Effects of Culture and Language on Safety
Evaluating Effects of Culture and Language on Safety
This paper (SPE 54448) was revised for publication from paper SPE 48891, prepared for the 1998 SPE International Conference and Exhibition held in Beijing, 2–6 November. Original m...
Fire risk assessment of Malaysia public hospital buildings
Fire risk assessment of Malaysia public hospital buildings
PurposeThis paper aims to evaluate the level of compliance of fire safety with the legal requirements in Malaysia government hospital buildings by evaluating via fire risk manageme...

Back to Top