Javascript must be enabled to continue!
485 MINIMALLY INVASIVE EN-BLOC OESOPHAGECTOMY: ANALYSIS OF THE OUTCOMES ALONG A LEARNING CURVE
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Minimally invasive oesophagectomy is technically demanding but benefits perioperative morbidity and intra-hospital mortality. We previously described open total adventitial resection of the cardia (TARC) as an optimal anatomical resection technique for lower oesophageal and gastro-esophageal junction cancers. We wanted to investigate whether the peri-operative benefits of minimally invasive techniques, along with en-bloc resection of the primary tumour, translate into long term survival benefit in a specialized high volume center along a surgeon learning curve.
Methods
Data from 198 consecutive patients undergoing oesophagectomy by a single surgeon was collected prospectively. Patient stratification was made to chronologically reflect four main stages of our learning curve: open surgery, Laparoscopic Ivor Lewis, laparoscopy/thoracoscopy with mini-thoracotomy and laparoscopic TARC. Primary outcomes included five-year survival rate, operating time, hospital stay, specimen lymphnodes. Peri-operative complications and mortality are also described. 45 patients had open surgery; laparoscopy (n = 50) was initiated after two years, and thoracoscopy (n = 56) introduced after case 94. MIO was performed for the last 47 patients.
Patients in all groups had similar demographics, histological diagnosis, preoperative and pathological staging.
Results
158 patients were male (79.8%); age was 63 +/− 10 years. Overall five-year survival rate was 45%; perioperative mortality rate was 1.5% (n = 3); 13 patients were returned to theatre. Hospital stay was 22+/−23 days. Specimen lymph nodes were 21+/− 8. Resection margins were negative (ACP) in 193 cases (97.4%).
Five-year survival rates during the 4 phases were 38.6%, 44.9%, 42.8% and 59% respectively, showing a benefit trend towards the end of the learning curve (p = 0.03).
Specimen lymph nodes were: open = 20.5+/−9.5; Lap = 19.5+/− 7; mini-tho = 19.9+/− 7; MIO = 25+/− 10 (p = 0.027). Resection margins were > 1 mm in 68.1%(open), 67.3%(lap), 64.2%(mini-tho) and 79.5(MIO).
Conclusion
Laparoscopic en-bloc resection of cancers of the OGJ requires a long learning curve. Proficiency gains along this learning curve affects oncological quality of oesophageal resectional surgery and benefits patients survival after minimally invasive oesophagectomy.
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: 485 MINIMALLY INVASIVE EN-BLOC OESOPHAGECTOMY: ANALYSIS OF THE OUTCOMES ALONG A LEARNING CURVE
Description:
Abstract
Minimally invasive oesophagectomy is technically demanding but benefits perioperative morbidity and intra-hospital mortality.
We previously described open total adventitial resection of the cardia (TARC) as an optimal anatomical resection technique for lower oesophageal and gastro-esophageal junction cancers.
We wanted to investigate whether the peri-operative benefits of minimally invasive techniques, along with en-bloc resection of the primary tumour, translate into long term survival benefit in a specialized high volume center along a surgeon learning curve.
Methods
Data from 198 consecutive patients undergoing oesophagectomy by a single surgeon was collected prospectively.
Patient stratification was made to chronologically reflect four main stages of our learning curve: open surgery, Laparoscopic Ivor Lewis, laparoscopy/thoracoscopy with mini-thoracotomy and laparoscopic TARC.
Primary outcomes included five-year survival rate, operating time, hospital stay, specimen lymphnodes.
Peri-operative complications and mortality are also described.
45 patients had open surgery; laparoscopy (n = 50) was initiated after two years, and thoracoscopy (n = 56) introduced after case 94.
MIO was performed for the last 47 patients.
Patients in all groups had similar demographics, histological diagnosis, preoperative and pathological staging.
Results
158 patients were male (79.
8%); age was 63 +/− 10 years.
Overall five-year survival rate was 45%; perioperative mortality rate was 1.
5% (n = 3); 13 patients were returned to theatre.
Hospital stay was 22+/−23 days.
Specimen lymph nodes were 21+/− 8.
Resection margins were negative (ACP) in 193 cases (97.
4%).
Five-year survival rates during the 4 phases were 38.
6%, 44.
9%, 42.
8% and 59% respectively, showing a benefit trend towards the end of the learning curve (p = 0.
03).
Specimen lymph nodes were: open = 20.
5+/−9.
5; Lap = 19.
5+/− 7; mini-tho = 19.
9+/− 7; MIO = 25+/− 10 (p = 0.
027).
Resection margins were > 1 mm in 68.
1%(open), 67.
3%(lap), 64.
2%(mini-tho) and 79.
5(MIO).
Conclusion
Laparoscopic en-bloc resection of cancers of the OGJ requires a long learning curve.
Proficiency gains along this learning curve affects oncological quality of oesophageal resectional surgery and benefits patients survival after minimally invasive oesophagectomy.
Related Results
Learning Curve for Minimally Invasive Oesophagectomy of Esophageal Cancer and contrast with Open Oesophagectomy
Learning Curve for Minimally Invasive Oesophagectomy of Esophageal Cancer and contrast with Open Oesophagectomy
Abstract
Purpose: Minimally invasive oesophagectomy is a technically demanding procedure; thus, the learning curve of this procedure should be explored. Then the relatively...
ADVANCES AND CHALLENGES IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY FOR THE TREATMENT OF HERNIAS
ADVANCES AND CHALLENGES IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY FOR THE TREATMENT OF HERNIAS
Minimally invasive surgery has revolutionized the treatment of various medical conditions, offering significant benefits in terms of recovery and fewer complications. In the field ...
Oncological outcomes in minimally invasive gastric cancer surgery
Oncological outcomes in minimally invasive gastric cancer surgery
In the first part of this dissertation an assessment was made on current available
evidence regarding outcomes in minimally invasive gastrectomy in comparison to open
gastrectomy. ...
O184 MINIMALLY INVASIVE OESOPHAGECTOMY: A LONG LEARNING CURVE FOR BETTER ONCOLOGICAL RESECTION AND IMPROVED SURVIVAL OUTCOME
O184 MINIMALLY INVASIVE OESOPHAGECTOMY: A LONG LEARNING CURVE FOR BETTER ONCOLOGICAL RESECTION AND IMPROVED SURVIVAL OUTCOME
Abstract
Aim
We wanted to investigate whether the established perioperative benefits of minimally invasive techniques, along wit...
063. ROBOTIC ASSISTED MIMINALLY INVASIVE IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL MINIMALLY INVASIVE IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY
063. ROBOTIC ASSISTED MIMINALLY INVASIVE IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL MINIMALLY INVASIVE IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY
Abstract
Background
Minimally invasive technique for esophagectomy has emerged as the standard of care for resectable esophageal...
Safety and outcomes after oesophagectomy in southern New Zealand: a 25‐year audit of a low volume centre
Safety and outcomes after oesophagectomy in southern New Zealand: a 25‐year audit of a low volume centre
AbstractBackgroundOver the last 2 decades, outcomes for oesophageal cancer have improved due to advances in surgical and oncological practice. Optimizing outcomes by centralization...
CREATING LEARNING MEDIA IN TEACHING ENGLISH AT SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 2 PAGELARAN ACADEMIC YEAR 2020/2021
CREATING LEARNING MEDIA IN TEACHING ENGLISH AT SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 2 PAGELARAN ACADEMIC YEAR 2020/2021
The pandemic Covid-19 currently demands teachers to be able to use technology in teaching and learning process. But in reality there are still many teachers who have not been able ...
HP27
MORTALITY, MORBIDITY AND 2 YEAR SURVIVAL FOLLOWING OESOPHAGECTOMY – DUNEDIN EXPERIENCE
HP27
MORTALITY, MORBIDITY AND 2 YEAR SURVIVAL FOLLOWING OESOPHAGECTOMY – DUNEDIN EXPERIENCE
Purpose Oesophagectomy is associated with considerable morbidity, mortality and poor survival of patients who have undergone oesophagectomy for oesophageal carcinoma. Numerous stu...

