Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Modulation of Osteoclast Interactions with Orthopaedic Biomaterials
View through CrossRef
Biomaterial integration in bone depends on bone remodelling at the bone-implant interface. Optimal balance of bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone deposition by osteoblasts is crucial for successful implantation, especially in orthopaedic surgery. Most studies examined osteoblast differentiation on biomaterials, yet few research has been conducted to explore the effect of different orthopaedic implants on osteoclast development. This review covers, in detail, the biology of osteoclasts, in vitro models of osteoclasts, and modulation of osteoclast activity by different implant surfaces, bio-ceramics, and polymers. Studies show that surface topography influence osteoclastogenesis. For instance, metal implants with rough surfaces enhanced osteoclast activity, while smooth surfaces resulted in poor osteoclast differentiation. In addition, surface modification of implants with anti-osteoporotic drug further decreased osteoclast activity. In bioceramics, osteoclast development depended on different chemical compositions. Strontium-incorporated bioceramics decreased osteoclast development, whereas higher concentrations of silica enhanced osteoclast activity. Differences between natural and synthetic polymers also modulated osteoclastogenesis. Physiochemical properties of implants affect osteoclast activity. Hence, understanding osteoclast biology and its response to the natural microarchitecture of bone are indispensable to design suitable implant interfaces and scaffolds, which will stimulate osteoclasts in ways similar to that of native bone.
Title: Modulation of Osteoclast Interactions with Orthopaedic Biomaterials
Description:
Biomaterial integration in bone depends on bone remodelling at the bone-implant interface.
Optimal balance of bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone deposition by osteoblasts is crucial for successful implantation, especially in orthopaedic surgery.
Most studies examined osteoblast differentiation on biomaterials, yet few research has been conducted to explore the effect of different orthopaedic implants on osteoclast development.
This review covers, in detail, the biology of osteoclasts, in vitro models of osteoclasts, and modulation of osteoclast activity by different implant surfaces, bio-ceramics, and polymers.
Studies show that surface topography influence osteoclastogenesis.
For instance, metal implants with rough surfaces enhanced osteoclast activity, while smooth surfaces resulted in poor osteoclast differentiation.
In addition, surface modification of implants with anti-osteoporotic drug further decreased osteoclast activity.
In bioceramics, osteoclast development depended on different chemical compositions.
Strontium-incorporated bioceramics decreased osteoclast development, whereas higher concentrations of silica enhanced osteoclast activity.
Differences between natural and synthetic polymers also modulated osteoclastogenesis.
Physiochemical properties of implants affect osteoclast activity.
Hence, understanding osteoclast biology and its response to the natural microarchitecture of bone are indispensable to design suitable implant interfaces and scaffolds, which will stimulate osteoclasts in ways similar to that of native bone.
Related Results
Downregulation of the metalloproteinases ADAM10 or ADAM17 promotes osteoclast differentiation
Downregulation of the metalloproteinases ADAM10 or ADAM17 promotes osteoclast differentiation
AbstractBone resorption is driven through osteoclast differentiation by macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand (RANKL)...
Carvacrol inhibits osteoclast differentiation induced by RANKL in RAW264.7 cells
Carvacrol inhibits osteoclast differentiation induced by RANKL in RAW264.7 cells
RAW264.7, a murine macrophage cell line, an osteoclast model used for the differentiation of Osteoclast by inducing RANKL. Carvacrol, a monoterpenoid phenol that possess various me...
Representation of women in orthopaedic surgery: perception of barriers among undergraduate medical students in Saudi Arabia
Representation of women in orthopaedic surgery: perception of barriers among undergraduate medical students in Saudi Arabia
Abstract
Background
While female participation has improved in several surgical specialties over time globally, no such increase has been observed i...
How Do Areas of Work Life Drive Burnout in Orthopaedic Attending Surgeons, Fellows, and Residents?
How Do Areas of Work Life Drive Burnout in Orthopaedic Attending Surgeons, Fellows, and Residents?
Abstract
Background
Concerning levels of burnout have been reported among orthopaedic surgeons and residents. Defined as emotional exhaustion and...
Dr DD Tanna – Story of a Legend
Dr DD Tanna – Story of a Legend
This interview was conducted at the famous Lotus Clinic at Mumbai. Interview of Dr DD Tanna (DDT) was personally conducted by our Editor Dr Ashok Shyam (AK). It was an interesting ...
Unsatisfactory gene transfer into bone-resorbing osteoclasts with liposomal transfection systems
Unsatisfactory gene transfer into bone-resorbing osteoclasts with liposomal transfection systems
Abstract
Background
Bone-resorbing osteoclasts are multinucleated cells that are formed via fusion of their hematopoietic stem cells. Many of the...
Recent advances in regenerative biomaterials
Recent advances in regenerative biomaterials
AbstractNowadays, biomaterials have evolved from the inert supports or functional substitutes to the bioactive materials able to trigger or promote the regenerative potential of ti...

