Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparison of Host Expression Systems used for Efficient Recombinant Proteins Production

View through CrossRef
The marvels of DNA recombination technology have revolutionized the field of biotechnology. Several hormones, antibody subunits, vaccines, enzymes, and interferons are being produced at the industrial level, in suitable expression systems, under optimized conditions. For recombinant protein production, a range of expression systems are available such as bacteria, yeast, fungi, plant cells, insects and animal cells, etc. Each recombinant protein has different nature due to which it requires different challenges regarding the expression system and production conditions. Every expression system has its advantages and limitations on the basis of which it can be considered or rejected for a particular protein production. Therefore, it is very significant to investigate the potential and limitations of several expression systems to choose the suitable one for particular protein production at an industrial scale. The optimization criteria of an expression system is evaluated on several factors such as productivity, efficiency, physiological characteristics, total cost, safety, convenience, and down-streaming conditions. Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae remained the organisms of choice to produce recombinant proteins for a long time, but now several other microorganisms are also being targeted to evaluate their efficiency toward recombinant protein production. Prokaryotic expression systems can be used to produce eukaryotic proteins as well however, the use of a eukaryotic expression system is preferable because it retains the structural, functional, and regulatory properties of therapeutic proteins. This review illustrates a brief view of a variety of expression systems, their efficiency, and limitations in recombinant protein production.
Title: Comparison of Host Expression Systems used for Efficient Recombinant Proteins Production
Description:
The marvels of DNA recombination technology have revolutionized the field of biotechnology.
Several hormones, antibody subunits, vaccines, enzymes, and interferons are being produced at the industrial level, in suitable expression systems, under optimized conditions.
For recombinant protein production, a range of expression systems are available such as bacteria, yeast, fungi, plant cells, insects and animal cells, etc.
Each recombinant protein has different nature due to which it requires different challenges regarding the expression system and production conditions.
Every expression system has its advantages and limitations on the basis of which it can be considered or rejected for a particular protein production.
Therefore, it is very significant to investigate the potential and limitations of several expression systems to choose the suitable one for particular protein production at an industrial scale.
The optimization criteria of an expression system is evaluated on several factors such as productivity, efficiency, physiological characteristics, total cost, safety, convenience, and down-streaming conditions.
Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae remained the organisms of choice to produce recombinant proteins for a long time, but now several other microorganisms are also being targeted to evaluate their efficiency toward recombinant protein production.
Prokaryotic expression systems can be used to produce eukaryotic proteins as well however, the use of a eukaryotic expression system is preferable because it retains the structural, functional, and regulatory properties of therapeutic proteins.
This review illustrates a brief view of a variety of expression systems, their efficiency, and limitations in recombinant protein production.

Related Results

Section-level genome sequencing and comparative genomics of Aspergillus sections Cavernicolus and Usti
Section-level genome sequencing and comparative genomics of Aspergillus sections Cavernicolus and Usti
Fig. S1. A cladogram representation of the phylogenetic relations between the species in this paper. The red labels show bootstrap values of 100 % and the black labels show bootstr...
A virus–target host proteins recognition method based on integrated complexes data and seed extension
A virus–target host proteins recognition method based on integrated complexes data and seed extension
AbstractBackgroundTarget drugs play an important role in the clinical treatment of virus diseases. Virus-encoded proteins are widely used as targets for target drugs. However, they...
Comprehensive host-pathogen protein-protein interaction network analysis
Comprehensive host-pathogen protein-protein interaction network analysis
Abstract Background Infectious diseases are a cruel assassin with millions of victims around the world each year. Understanding infectious mechanism...
Reverse Genetics with a Full-length Infectious cDNA Clone of Bovine Torovirus
Reverse Genetics with a Full-length Infectious cDNA Clone of Bovine Torovirus
Abstract Torovirus (ToV) has recently been classified in the new family Tobaniviridae, although it belonged to the Coronavirus (CoV) family historically. Reverse ge...
INTERACTION OF ANTI-LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE FACTOR ISOFORM 3 FROM BLACK TIGER SHRIMP Penaeus monodon WITH WHITE SPOT SYNDROME VIRUS PROTEINS
INTERACTION OF ANTI-LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE FACTOR ISOFORM 3 FROM BLACK TIGER SHRIMP Penaeus monodon WITH WHITE SPOT SYNDROME VIRUS PROTEINS
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) play a vital role in combating microbial pathogens. Among AMPs identified in Penaeus monodon, only anti-lipopolysaccharide factor isoform 3 (ALFPm3) h...
Identification and characterization of CFEM Proteins from Phakopsora pachyrhizi, the Asian soybean rust fungus
Identification and characterization of CFEM Proteins from Phakopsora pachyrhizi, the Asian soybean rust fungus
Asian soybean rust (ASR) caused by the fungus Phakopsora pachyrhizi is one of the main fungal diseases of soybean, which can cause losses of up to 95% of production under favorable...

Back to Top