Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Rise of Artificial Intelligence in Intellectual Property Law: Patentability and Copyright Issues

View through CrossRef
The rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming and posing important challenges in the field of Intellectual Property (IP) law regarding patentability and copyright. As AI systems increasingly produce inventions and creative works without human involvement, doubts arise on how suitable the present framework of intellectual property rights-invented to protect human-made innovations-is for such a confused state of AI. This paper develops its line of analysis around the AI implications for patent and copyright laws, checking out if current legal structures are such that they can address outputs from AI systems. While current laws in the patent regime recognize only a human inventor, an AI system can produce novel and non- obvious inventions. Should AI be viewed as an inventor, or would patent laws be transformed to recognize that AI is merely a tool in the invention process? The paper discusses various in-applicable case law and decisions such as the 2019 ruling of the USPTO that in certain inventions, the inventor could only be a human being, which manifests the fact that patentability frameworks remain unfit for AI-generated inventions. Moreover, in relation to copyright, it can be noted that the contingent works executed by AI challenge and suspend the necessity for human authorship. When AI generates such works on its way, the alternative arises and must be critically analysed who is to be considered the actual owner of copyright over the work? Current copyright frameworks in various jurisdictions, such as the U.S., do not extend protection to AI-generated works without incorporation of some human involvement in their creation. Possible suggestions of reform like placing authorship over X work under the AIs developer or user, or a New IP category addressing the input of AI in creation, formulations were discussed in the paper. Ultimately, innovations in both patent and copyright laws ought to grow in a balanced way that, while producing adequate protective layers over human creators, prepares itself to come into terms with rising Aid creativity and invention. For maintaining justice and fairness, reform in legal constructs for tracking with AI-generated creations is inevitable.
Title: The Rise of Artificial Intelligence in Intellectual Property Law: Patentability and Copyright Issues
Description:
The rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming and posing important challenges in the field of Intellectual Property (IP) law regarding patentability and copyright.
As AI systems increasingly produce inventions and creative works without human involvement, doubts arise on how suitable the present framework of intellectual property rights-invented to protect human-made innovations-is for such a confused state of AI.
This paper develops its line of analysis around the AI implications for patent and copyright laws, checking out if current legal structures are such that they can address outputs from AI systems.
While current laws in the patent regime recognize only a human inventor, an AI system can produce novel and non- obvious inventions.
Should AI be viewed as an inventor, or would patent laws be transformed to recognize that AI is merely a tool in the invention process? The paper discusses various in-applicable case law and decisions such as the 2019 ruling of the USPTO that in certain inventions, the inventor could only be a human being, which manifests the fact that patentability frameworks remain unfit for AI-generated inventions.
Moreover, in relation to copyright, it can be noted that the contingent works executed by AI challenge and suspend the necessity for human authorship.
When AI generates such works on its way, the alternative arises and must be critically analysed who is to be considered the actual owner of copyright over the work? Current copyright frameworks in various jurisdictions, such as the U.
S.
, do not extend protection to AI-generated works without incorporation of some human involvement in their creation.
Possible suggestions of reform like placing authorship over X work under the AIs developer or user, or a New IP category addressing the input of AI in creation, formulations were discussed in the paper.
Ultimately, innovations in both patent and copyright laws ought to grow in a balanced way that, while producing adequate protective layers over human creators, prepares itself to come into terms with rising Aid creativity and invention.
For maintaining justice and fairness, reform in legal constructs for tracking with AI-generated creations is inevitable.

Related Results

Indigenous Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research
Indigenous Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research
Edited CollectionRimmer, Matthew (Ed.) (2015) Indigenous Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research. Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property. Edward Elgar, Chel...
Relative and Absolute Patentability
Relative and Absolute Patentability
In this Article, we define and interrogate a new typology for patentability rules. In our typology, some such rules are predominantly relative inquiries—meaning that they entail t...
<i>MGM v. Grokster</i> – Amicus Brief of Professors Peter S. Menell, David Nimmer, Robert P. Merges, and Justin Hughes
<i>MGM v. Grokster</i> – Amicus Brief of Professors Peter S. Menell, David Nimmer, Robert P. Merges, and Justin Hughes
This case turns on whether the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in <i>Sony</i> conclusively resolves at the summary judgment stage the present dispute – involving striking...
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...
Implications Of Legal Protection Of Intellectual Property Rights For Obtaining Economic Benefits
Implications Of Legal Protection Of Intellectual Property Rights For Obtaining Economic Benefits
Intellectual property rights are an implication of the development of international trade, especially in industrial countries. In developing countries, the understanding and protec...
The Ghost of Millar v. Taylor
The Ghost of Millar v. Taylor
The Ghost of Millar v. Taylor walks abroad once more, relishing the prospect of “the next great copyright act” and tempting us to ask again whether the origins of copyright are to ...
Evolving Intellectual Property Doctrines in the Era of Emerging Technologies
Evolving Intellectual Property Doctrines in the Era of Emerging Technologies
The rapid advancement of emerging technologies including artificial intelligence, blockchain, biotechnology, and digital platforms has fundamentally challenged traditional intellec...
LEGAL ASPECTS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND MANAGEMENT TOOLS
LEGAL ASPECTS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND MANAGEMENT TOOLS
This study examines the legal aspects of intellectual property (IP) and management instruments. It is demonstrated that intellectual property represents the outcome of an individua...

Back to Top