Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Patient-Centred Management of Well-Controlled Haemophilia: Obtaining Opinions and Definitions Through a Delphi Consensus

View through CrossRef
Background/Objectives: For people with haemophilia, health-related quality of life mainly depends on the arthropathy caused by repeated joint bleeding. Prophylaxis is the standard of care in patients with severe bleeding phenotypes, but globally, none of the measures used to assess patients’ outcomes consider their desires and life expectations. We propose the concept of the “patient-centred management of well-controlled haemophilia” to define individual responses to prophylaxis. The aims of this work are (1) to achieve agreement about the definition of the “patient-centred management of well-controlled haemophilia” by a steering committee of experts, and (2) to share a series of statements that should define the “patient-centred management of well-controlled haemophilia” with other haemophilia clinicians looking for a consensus in this scenario. Methods: An eight-expert group was established to define the concept of the “patient-centred management of well-controlled haemophilia”. Seven major aspects were identified, and a final version of 42 statements was established and distributed to a 75-expert panel for consensus gathering using the Delphi methodology. Results: Forty-eight experts participated in the first round (participation rate: 64%); two sentences from domain 3 were split, leading to a total of 44 statements across the seven domains. Consensus was achieved in 92.85% of cases. Five items and three statements advanced to the second round. Eleven statements were reconsidered in the second round (response rate: 100%). The questionnaire presented high internal consistency. Conclusions: New treatments offer promising solutions for patients, but there is a paucity of models to measure global outcomes. Patient-centred medicine requires multidimensional assessment, and the “patient-centred management of well-controlled haemophilia” concept is intended to enable this.
Title: Patient-Centred Management of Well-Controlled Haemophilia: Obtaining Opinions and Definitions Through a Delphi Consensus
Description:
Background/Objectives: For people with haemophilia, health-related quality of life mainly depends on the arthropathy caused by repeated joint bleeding.
Prophylaxis is the standard of care in patients with severe bleeding phenotypes, but globally, none of the measures used to assess patients’ outcomes consider their desires and life expectations.
We propose the concept of the “patient-centred management of well-controlled haemophilia” to define individual responses to prophylaxis.
The aims of this work are (1) to achieve agreement about the definition of the “patient-centred management of well-controlled haemophilia” by a steering committee of experts, and (2) to share a series of statements that should define the “patient-centred management of well-controlled haemophilia” with other haemophilia clinicians looking for a consensus in this scenario.
Methods: An eight-expert group was established to define the concept of the “patient-centred management of well-controlled haemophilia”.
Seven major aspects were identified, and a final version of 42 statements was established and distributed to a 75-expert panel for consensus gathering using the Delphi methodology.
Results: Forty-eight experts participated in the first round (participation rate: 64%); two sentences from domain 3 were split, leading to a total of 44 statements across the seven domains.
Consensus was achieved in 92.
85% of cases.
Five items and three statements advanced to the second round.
Eleven statements were reconsidered in the second round (response rate: 100%).
The questionnaire presented high internal consistency.
Conclusions: New treatments offer promising solutions for patients, but there is a paucity of models to measure global outcomes.
Patient-centred medicine requires multidimensional assessment, and the “patient-centred management of well-controlled haemophilia” concept is intended to enable this.

Related Results

Treatment trends for haemophilia A and haemophilia B in the United States: results from the 2010 practice patterns survey
Treatment trends for haemophilia A and haemophilia B in the United States: results from the 2010 practice patterns survey
Summary.  Frequent evaluation of haemophilia treatment is necessary to improve patient care. The 2010 Practice Patterns Survey (PPS) investigated current trends in haemophilia trea...
A preliminary application of a haemophilia value framework to emerging therapies in haemophilia
A preliminary application of a haemophilia value framework to emerging therapies in haemophilia
AbstractIntroductionEmergence of new therapies are anticipated to improve clinical outcomes and quality of life of persons with haemophilia. Challenges in conducting randomized cli...
A transgender person with haemophilia
A transgender person with haemophilia
Abstract Introduction Transgender people face many obstacles to accessing healthcare but cultural changes are likely to i...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Haemophilia care in Iraq; a multi-centre study
Haemophilia care in Iraq; a multi-centre study
Objectives: To evaluate the level of care available to haemophilia patients. Method: The descriptive, retrospective analytical study was conducted from December 15, 2020, to March...

Back to Top