Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Introduction: Sentencing Orlando

View through CrossRef
The introduction advocates for a focus on individual sentences as a fruitful way to read Woolf. It contextualises this approach by outlining the critical history of Orlando , and discusses Woolf’s theorising of the literary sentence in A Room of One’s Own , where Woolf’s emphasis on shape and form converges with her discussion of a gender and genre politics of the sentence. The introduction makes claims for Orlando as enacting this politics aesthetically, and therefore as especially suited for a study of the form and structure (morphology) of its sentences in the wider context of modernist aesthetics. It attends to the legal and discursive meanings of the word sentence , as a way into Orlando ’s subversive treatment of reading practices, censorship, sexuality, gender and race – all of which are examined in this volume. The introduction also considers the stakes involved in reading Woolf alongside the new aestheticist critical practices currently shaping the field of modernist studies, delineating thereby the volume’s aim to open up further avenues for exploring a morphology of the modernist sentence.
Title: Introduction: Sentencing Orlando
Description:
The introduction advocates for a focus on individual sentences as a fruitful way to read Woolf.
It contextualises this approach by outlining the critical history of Orlando , and discusses Woolf’s theorising of the literary sentence in A Room of One’s Own , where Woolf’s emphasis on shape and form converges with her discussion of a gender and genre politics of the sentence.
The introduction makes claims for Orlando as enacting this politics aesthetically, and therefore as especially suited for a study of the form and structure (morphology) of its sentences in the wider context of modernist aesthetics.
It attends to the legal and discursive meanings of the word sentence , as a way into Orlando ’s subversive treatment of reading practices, censorship, sexuality, gender and race – all of which are examined in this volume.
The introduction also considers the stakes involved in reading Woolf alongside the new aestheticist critical practices currently shaping the field of modernist studies, delineating thereby the volume’s aim to open up further avenues for exploring a morphology of the modernist sentence.

Related Results

Sentencing consistency in the New Zealand District Courts
Sentencing consistency in the New Zealand District Courts
<p>This thesis examines the consistency of sentencing between the circuits of the New Zealand District Courts. Four predictions based on a sequence or chain of theories incor...
Assessing Proposals for Mandatory Procedural Protections for Sentencings under the Guidelines
Assessing Proposals for Mandatory Procedural Protections for Sentencings under the Guidelines
12 Federal Sentencing Reporter 212 (2000)The federal sentencing guidelines have received sustained criticism from scholars, judges, and practitioners. Critics claim that the guidel...
What's Happening with Child Pornography Sentencing?
What's Happening with Child Pornography Sentencing?
Abstract Guest editor Jelani Jefferson Exum introduces this issue of Federal Sentencing Reporter, which focuses on federal child pornography sentencing. Acknowledgin...
Sentencing Enhancements
Sentencing Enhancements
Sentencing enhancements are policies that mandate that people who are convicted of criminalized behaviors while engaging in generally non-criminalized behaviors—such as being in a ...
Evidence-Based Sentencing
Evidence-Based Sentencing
The evidence-based practice (EBP) movement can be traced to a 1992 article in the Journal of the American Medical Association, although decision-making with empirical evidence (rat...
Sentencing in Chaos
Sentencing in Chaos
Abstract Antonin Scalia famously observed in his dissent in United States v. Booker that an advisory sentencing guidelines regime would result in a “discordant symph...

Back to Top