Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Early experience with patient-specific low-cost 3D-printed polymethylmethacrylate cranioplasty implants in a lower-middle-income-country: Technical note and economic analysis
View through CrossRef
Background:
Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) cranioplasty, while widely prevalent, has limitations associated with freehand manual intraoperative molding. PMMA has been superseded by titanium or Polyetheretherketone implants, prefabricated commercially from preoperative CT scans, and boasting superior clinical and cosmetic outcomes. However, such services are extremely inaccessible and unaffordable in the lower-middle-income country (LMIC) settings. The study aims to describe, in detail, the process of making ultra-low-cost patient-specific PMMA cranioplasty implants with minimum resources using open-access software. We report the first such service from the public health-care system within Pakistan, a LMIC.
Methods:
Using open-source software, preoperative CT heads were used to prefabricate three-dimensional implants. Both implant and cranial defects were printed using polylactic acid (PLA) to assess the implant’s size and fit preoperatively. From the PLA implant, we fashioned a silicon mold that shapes the PMMA implant. Ten patients who underwent cranioplasty using our technique for various cranial defects with at least a 12-month follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical, cosmetic, and radiological outcomes were objectively assessed.
Results:
Etiology of injury was trauma (8), malignant MCA infarct (1), and arteriovenous fistula (1). We produced seven frontotemporal-parietal implants, one bifrontal, one frontal, and one frontoparietal. At 1 year, eight patients reported their cosmetic appearance comparable to before the defect. Radiological outcome was classified as “excellent” for eight patients. No postoperative complications were encountered, nor did any implant have to be removed. One patient’s implant involving the orbital ridge had an unsatisfactory cosmetic outcome and required revision surgery. The average cost per implant to the National Health Service was US$40.
Conclusion:
Prefabricated patient-specific PMMA cranioplasty implants are cost-effective. A single surgeon can fashion them in a limited resource setting and provide personalized medicine with excellent clinical/cosmetic-radiological results. Our method produces patient-specific cranioplasty implants in an otherwise unaffordable LMIC setting.
Title: Early experience with patient-specific low-cost 3D-printed polymethylmethacrylate cranioplasty implants in a lower-middle-income-country: Technical note and economic analysis
Description:
Background:
Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) cranioplasty, while widely prevalent, has limitations associated with freehand manual intraoperative molding.
PMMA has been superseded by titanium or Polyetheretherketone implants, prefabricated commercially from preoperative CT scans, and boasting superior clinical and cosmetic outcomes.
However, such services are extremely inaccessible and unaffordable in the lower-middle-income country (LMIC) settings.
The study aims to describe, in detail, the process of making ultra-low-cost patient-specific PMMA cranioplasty implants with minimum resources using open-access software.
We report the first such service from the public health-care system within Pakistan, a LMIC.
Methods:
Using open-source software, preoperative CT heads were used to prefabricate three-dimensional implants.
Both implant and cranial defects were printed using polylactic acid (PLA) to assess the implant’s size and fit preoperatively.
From the PLA implant, we fashioned a silicon mold that shapes the PMMA implant.
Ten patients who underwent cranioplasty using our technique for various cranial defects with at least a 12-month follow-up were retrospectively reviewed.
Clinical, cosmetic, and radiological outcomes were objectively assessed.
Results:
Etiology of injury was trauma (8), malignant MCA infarct (1), and arteriovenous fistula (1).
We produced seven frontotemporal-parietal implants, one bifrontal, one frontal, and one frontoparietal.
At 1 year, eight patients reported their cosmetic appearance comparable to before the defect.
Radiological outcome was classified as “excellent” for eight patients.
No postoperative complications were encountered, nor did any implant have to be removed.
One patient’s implant involving the orbital ridge had an unsatisfactory cosmetic outcome and required revision surgery.
The average cost per implant to the National Health Service was US$40.
Conclusion:
Prefabricated patient-specific PMMA cranioplasty implants are cost-effective.
A single surgeon can fashion them in a limited resource setting and provide personalized medicine with excellent clinical/cosmetic-radiological results.
Our method produces patient-specific cranioplasty implants in an otherwise unaffordable LMIC setting.
Related Results
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Cranioplasty in Acoustic Neuroma Surgery
Cranioplasty in Acoustic Neuroma Surgery
AbstractObjectives To measure the incidence of postoperative headaches after retrosigmoid resections of acoustic neuromas and to evaluate the impact of cranioplasty on the preventi...
Early Versus Delayed Cranioplasty After Decompressive Craniectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Early Versus Delayed Cranioplasty After Decompressive Craniectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
ABSTRACT
Introduction
Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a surgical procedure that involves the removal of a portion of th...
Ary Scheffer, een Nederlandse Fransman
Ary Scheffer, een Nederlandse Fransman
AbstractAry Scheffer (1795-1858) is so generally included in the French School (Note 2)- unsurprisingly, since his career was confined almost entirely to Paris - that the fact that...
Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Cranioplasty Implants
Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Cranioplasty Implants
Purpose:
The aim of this study was to compare operative duration and total hospital costs incurred for patients undergoing elective cranioplasty with a variety ...
Effect of cranioplasty timing on the functional neurological outcome and postoperative complications
Effect of cranioplasty timing on the functional neurological outcome and postoperative complications
Background:
The optimal timing for performing cranioplasty and its effect on functional outcome remains debatable. Multiple confounding factors may come into role; including the m...
Pediatric Cranioplasty Using Hydroxyapatite Cement: A Retrospective Review and Preliminary Computational Model
Pediatric Cranioplasty Using Hydroxyapatite Cement: A Retrospective Review and Preliminary Computational Model
<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Cranioplasty is a standard technique for skull defect repair. Restoration of cranial defects is imperative for brain protection ...
Outcomes of Cranioplasty after Craniectomy
Outcomes of Cranioplasty after Craniectomy
Objective: Craniectomy is a widely used procedure in neurosurgery that results in more cranioplasties to repair skull defects. The complication rate after cranioplasties seems to ...

