Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Conservative Americanism
View through CrossRef
Conservative Americanism: Nativism, Unionism, and Slavery in Border South Politics, 1854-1861 explores the rise of Conservative Americanism—an ideology that linked the worsening sectional crisis of the 1850s to the country's growing immigrant population—among former Whigs in the Border South. Jesse George-Nichol challenges the prevailing wisdom that Unionism, rather than genuine nativism, drove these Southerners to join the nativist Know Nothing or American Party. She argues that Southern nativism and Unionism were inextricably linked, bound by a conviction that foreigners and foreign ideas posed a threat to slavery. Southern moderates understood that immigrants were responsible for the growing political imbalance between the free and slave states, and after the Kansas-Nebraska crisis, they came to believe that foreign radicalism was central to the mounting animus against slavery in the North and West. These Southerners increasingly saw the sectional conflict as one that not only pitted Northerners against Southerners and freedom against slavery, but also as a collision between native American moderation and foreign fanaticism. This perception continued to motivate Southern Know Nothings through the election of 1860, the secession crisis, and beyond. This book sheds new light on the relationships between conservatism, nativism, Unionism, and slavery in Border South politics before the Civil War. George-Nichol thus argues that understanding Southern nativism is essential to understanding Southern Unionism in the Civil War-era.
Title: Conservative Americanism
Description:
Conservative Americanism: Nativism, Unionism, and Slavery in Border South Politics, 1854-1861 explores the rise of Conservative Americanism—an ideology that linked the worsening sectional crisis of the 1850s to the country's growing immigrant population—among former Whigs in the Border South.
Jesse George-Nichol challenges the prevailing wisdom that Unionism, rather than genuine nativism, drove these Southerners to join the nativist Know Nothing or American Party.
She argues that Southern nativism and Unionism were inextricably linked, bound by a conviction that foreigners and foreign ideas posed a threat to slavery.
Southern moderates understood that immigrants were responsible for the growing political imbalance between the free and slave states, and after the Kansas-Nebraska crisis, they came to believe that foreign radicalism was central to the mounting animus against slavery in the North and West.
These Southerners increasingly saw the sectional conflict as one that not only pitted Northerners against Southerners and freedom against slavery, but also as a collision between native American moderation and foreign fanaticism.
This perception continued to motivate Southern Know Nothings through the election of 1860, the secession crisis, and beyond.
This book sheds new light on the relationships between conservatism, nativism, Unionism, and slavery in Border South politics before the Civil War.
George-Nichol thus argues that understanding Southern nativism is essential to understanding Southern Unionism in the Civil War-era.
Related Results
Ira Dworkin on Schatz and Shorbagy
Ira Dworkin on Schatz and Shorbagy
This essay puts Egypt, the “Arab Spring,” and Islamic activism into a broader perspective, arguing that a binary approach pitting “anti-Americanism” against “pro-Americanism” is pr...
Seyed Mohammad Marandi on Schatz and Shorbagy
Seyed Mohammad Marandi on Schatz and Shorbagy
This essay draws on Chomsky, and notes that for many people the term “anti-Americanism” works like a tool preventing criticism of the U.S. It argues that the term frames the narrat...
The Conservative Press in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century America
The Conservative Press in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century America
Selecting journals that speak for a very large number of topics addressed by the conservative press, this volume profiles selected conservative journals published since 1787. The c...
Sabine Broeck on Giorgio Mariani
Sabine Broeck on Giorgio Mariani
This essay is a response to Giorgio Mariani’s essay in this book, Global Perspectives on the United States. It empathizes with Mariani’s frustrations with the constant replay and r...
Manar Shorbagy on Edward Schatz
Manar Shorbagy on Edward Schatz
This essay is a response to Edward Schatz’s contribution in this book, Global Perspectives on the United States. It acknowledges ways that Schatz contributes to our understanding o...
Americanization and Anti-Americanism in Poland
Americanization and Anti-Americanism in Poland
This essay explores Polish exceptionalism vis-à-vis both Americanization and anti-Americanism. It argues that this is evident during the Cold War period as well as in the post-Cold...
Mobilizing the Faithful
Mobilizing the Faithful
In this chapter, we examine how conservative and right-wing organizations mobilize predominately White, religious women to action. We begin by outlining the importance of networks ...
Sophia Balakian on Broeck and Mariani
Sophia Balakian on Broeck and Mariani
This essay argues that both Broeck and Mariani implicitly and explicitly frame discourses of anti-Americanism as a form of name-calling, and that this involves condemnation in spec...

