Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

3727 Addressing inequities in dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) access: a multi-dimensional quality improvement approach

View through CrossRef
Abstract Introduction Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis and guiding osteoporosis treatment, particularly when used alongside fracture risk assessment tools such as FRAX. Limited access to DXA scans in some centres, highlighting the need to prioritise their use effectively. The project is aimed to improve DXA access and prompt reporting to meet Fracture Liaison Service Database (FLS-DB) national standards. Methods This multi-dimensional improvement project began in 2022 using the Model for Improvement. Process mapping identified inefficiencies, with ownership secured through Radiology Directorate and cross-divisional engagement involving Clinical Leads from Rheumatology and Care of the Elderly. A small multidisciplinary working group was formed to drive the change. Progress was monitored via FLS-DB Key Performance Indicator 5 (KPI 5): percentage of patients receiving a DXA within 90 days of fracture and DXA waiting list. Results Baseline results in 2021: 875 fragility fracture patients identified; 29.2% (255) scanned within 90 days, average DXA waiting list 1028/month. Initiatives between 2022 and 2024 included training of radiographer, expanding scanning from 3 to 5 days/week; dedicated DXA reporting training and non-reporting agreement for FLS patients. Impact of FLS expansion on DXA scan waiting: 2022: 1648 fracture patients identified; 16.8% (276) scanned; waiting list rose to 1541/month. 2023: 2179 fracture patients identified; 17.4% (379) scanned; waiting list increased to 1980/month. Impact of quality initiatives: 2024: 2621 patients identified; 25.7% (673) scanned (163% increase from 2021); DXA waiting list dropped to an average 849/month. 2025: DXA waiting list reduced further to average 786/month. Conclusion The quality improvement project initiated in 2022, took three years to streamline our referral pathways. Two radiology staff training and operating five-day DXA scanning helped reduce both the DXA scan waiting list and clinician reporting time. The current service has adopted good practices to improve DXA scanning provision to match the demand of increased fracture case identification. However, further improvement is needed.
Title: 3727 Addressing inequities in dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) access: a multi-dimensional quality improvement approach
Description:
Abstract Introduction Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis and guiding osteoporosis treatment, particularly when used alongside fracture risk assessment tools such as FRAX.
Limited access to DXA scans in some centres, highlighting the need to prioritise their use effectively.
The project is aimed to improve DXA access and prompt reporting to meet Fracture Liaison Service Database (FLS-DB) national standards.
Methods This multi-dimensional improvement project began in 2022 using the Model for Improvement.
Process mapping identified inefficiencies, with ownership secured through Radiology Directorate and cross-divisional engagement involving Clinical Leads from Rheumatology and Care of the Elderly.
A small multidisciplinary working group was formed to drive the change.
Progress was monitored via FLS-DB Key Performance Indicator 5 (KPI 5): percentage of patients receiving a DXA within 90 days of fracture and DXA waiting list.
Results Baseline results in 2021: 875 fragility fracture patients identified; 29.
2% (255) scanned within 90 days, average DXA waiting list 1028/month.
Initiatives between 2022 and 2024 included training of radiographer, expanding scanning from 3 to 5 days/week; dedicated DXA reporting training and non-reporting agreement for FLS patients.
Impact of FLS expansion on DXA scan waiting: 2022: 1648 fracture patients identified; 16.
8% (276) scanned; waiting list rose to 1541/month.
2023: 2179 fracture patients identified; 17.
4% (379) scanned; waiting list increased to 1980/month.
Impact of quality initiatives: 2024: 2621 patients identified; 25.
7% (673) scanned (163% increase from 2021); DXA waiting list dropped to an average 849/month.
2025: DXA waiting list reduced further to average 786/month.
Conclusion The quality improvement project initiated in 2022, took three years to streamline our referral pathways.
Two radiology staff training and operating five-day DXA scanning helped reduce both the DXA scan waiting list and clinician reporting time.
The current service has adopted good practices to improve DXA scanning provision to match the demand of increased fracture case identification.
However, further improvement is needed.

Related Results

Feasibility of energy-resolved angiography
Feasibility of energy-resolved angiography
<p dir="ltr">Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death globally, with coronary heart disease being one of the most common types of CVD. Two-dimensional x-ray...
Feasibility of energy-resolved angiography
Feasibility of energy-resolved angiography
<p dir="ltr">Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death globally, with coronary heart disease being one of the most common types of CVD. Two-dimensional x-ray...
Trapezium Bone Density—A Comparison of Measurements by DXA and CT
Trapezium Bone Density—A Comparison of Measurements by DXA and CT
Bone density may influence the primary fixation of cementless implants, and poor bone density may increase the risk of implant failure. Before deciding on using total joint replace...
SU‐FF‐I‐111: Feasibility of Using Higher Energy Beam Pairs to Improve DXA Accuracy
SU‐FF‐I‐111: Feasibility of Using Higher Energy Beam Pairs to Improve DXA Accuracy
In standard DXA the fat content of the soft tissue containing the bone is assumed to be the same as the soft tissue in the baseline region of the scan adjacent to the bone. Unfortu...
ECG CLASSIFICATION COMPARISON BETWEEN MF-DFA AND MF-DXA
ECG CLASSIFICATION COMPARISON BETWEEN MF-DFA AND MF-DXA
In this paper, automatic electrocardiogram (ECG) recognition and classification algorithms based on multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis (MF-DFA) and multifractal detrended ...
Assessment of Bone Acquisition in Childhood and Adolescence
Assessment of Bone Acquisition in Childhood and Adolescence
Availability, ease of use, relative low cost, and minimal radiation exposure have made dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry the most widely used technique worldwide to obtain bone meas...
A novel classifier of radiographic knee osteoarthritis for use on knee DXA images is predictive of joint replacement in UK Biobank
A novel classifier of radiographic knee osteoarthritis for use on knee DXA images is predictive of joint replacement in UK Biobank
AbstractObjectivesDXA scans may offer a novel means of evaluating radiographic knee osteoarthritis (rKOA) in large population studies and through opportunistic screening. We aimed ...
Validation of a New Point-of-Care Calcaneal Ultrasound Densitometer (BeeTLe)
Validation of a New Point-of-Care Calcaneal Ultrasound Densitometer (BeeTLe)
Abstract Introduction Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) represents the gold standard for measuring bone mineral density (BMD). However, its size and bulkiness limit i...

Back to Top