Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Exploring individual biases in BCI research and users: Does gender matter?
View through CrossRef
Objective
Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) is an interdisciplinary research field characterized by rapid technological advances and collaborative efforts to develop user-friendly, adaptive devices that enable healthy and non-responsive users to communicate and interact with their environment through brain signals elicited by specific instructions or tasks. However, research often shows gender bias, especially in scientific disciplines with strong technological, medical, or social foundations. Gender biases have been found among scientists conducting and publishing research. They may also exist among examiners and study participants.
Research question and methods
This study investigates whether gender biases are present in BCI research, particularly in the distribution of women and men across editorial boards and authorship of studies focusing on psychological human factors that influence BCI performance and usability. We systematically analyzed the gender distribution in neuroscientific journals that accept BCI research or have a strong focus on BCI, reviewed their editorial boards, analyzed BCI publications –including those related to psychological human factors–and examined gender biases among study participants. Additionally, we reviewed EEG studies investigating sex- or gender-related differences in EEG signals relevant to BCI research.
Results
We observed significant differences in the representation of women and men among editorial board members and BCI authors, including first-, co-, and last-authorship. Similarly, there were differences in the gender distribution of participants in BCI studies. Moreover, the literature review suggests potential differences in brain signals between women and men within the studied samples. The impact of these differences on performance in BCIs, such as motor-imagery SMR-BCIs, SSVEP-BCIs, and P300-BCIs, as well as training methods and BCI usability, still needs to be explored.
Conclusion
Our findings emphasize the importance of increasing awareness of gender-, sex-, and user-related factors in BCI research. In line with recent perspectives that highlight the need to address gender biases and individual differences in the language of the user, their motivation or cultural background, future BCI research should focus on systematically examining gender and sex differences. This will help promote gender equality in BCI research and lead to a better understanding of users’ needs, preferences, and individual characteristics.
Title: Exploring individual biases in BCI research and users: Does gender matter?
Description:
Objective
Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) is an interdisciplinary research field characterized by rapid technological advances and collaborative efforts to develop user-friendly, adaptive devices that enable healthy and non-responsive users to communicate and interact with their environment through brain signals elicited by specific instructions or tasks.
However, research often shows gender bias, especially in scientific disciplines with strong technological, medical, or social foundations.
Gender biases have been found among scientists conducting and publishing research.
They may also exist among examiners and study participants.
Research question and methods
This study investigates whether gender biases are present in BCI research, particularly in the distribution of women and men across editorial boards and authorship of studies focusing on psychological human factors that influence BCI performance and usability.
We systematically analyzed the gender distribution in neuroscientific journals that accept BCI research or have a strong focus on BCI, reviewed their editorial boards, analyzed BCI publications –including those related to psychological human factors–and examined gender biases among study participants.
Additionally, we reviewed EEG studies investigating sex- or gender-related differences in EEG signals relevant to BCI research.
Results
We observed significant differences in the representation of women and men among editorial board members and BCI authors, including first-, co-, and last-authorship.
Similarly, there were differences in the gender distribution of participants in BCI studies.
Moreover, the literature review suggests potential differences in brain signals between women and men within the studied samples.
The impact of these differences on performance in BCIs, such as motor-imagery SMR-BCIs, SSVEP-BCIs, and P300-BCIs, as well as training methods and BCI usability, still needs to be explored.
Conclusion
Our findings emphasize the importance of increasing awareness of gender-, sex-, and user-related factors in BCI research.
In line with recent perspectives that highlight the need to address gender biases and individual differences in the language of the user, their motivation or cultural background, future BCI research should focus on systematically examining gender and sex differences.
This will help promote gender equality in BCI research and lead to a better understanding of users’ needs, preferences, and individual characteristics.
Related Results
Neural mechanisms of training in Brain-Computer Interface : A Biophysical modeling approach
Neural mechanisms of training in Brain-Computer Interface : A Biophysical modeling approach
Abstract
Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) is a system that translates neural activity into commands, allowing direct communication between the brain and external devi...
Can Vibrotactile Stimulation and tDCS Help Inefficient BCI Users?
Can Vibrotactile Stimulation and tDCS Help Inefficient BCI Users?
Abstract
Brain-computer interface (BCI) has helped people by enabling them to control a computer or machine through brain activity without actual body movement. Despite thi...
Can vibrotactile stimulation and tDCS help inefficient BCI users?
Can vibrotactile stimulation and tDCS help inefficient BCI users?
Abstract
Brain-computer interface (BCI) has helped people by allowing them to control a computer or machine through brain activity without ac...
The therapeutic role of baicalein in combating experimental periodontitis with diabetes via Nrf2 antioxidant signaling pathway
The therapeutic role of baicalein in combating experimental periodontitis with diabetes via Nrf2 antioxidant signaling pathway
AbstractBackground and objectiveOxidative stress has been suggested as an important pathogenic factor contributing to chronic periodontitis with diabetes mellitus (CPDM). Previous ...
IIST BCI Dataset-4 for Selected 100 Telugu words
IIST BCI Dataset-4 for Selected 100 Telugu words
To overcome the challenges faced by people with neurodegenerative diseases, Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) systems must make use of datasets relevant to patient's spoken languages....
Ethical Aspects of BCI Technology: What Is the State of the Art?
Ethical Aspects of BCI Technology: What Is the State of the Art?
Brain–Computer Interface (BCI) technology is a promising research area in many domains. Brain activity can be interpreted through both invasive and non-invasive monitoring devices,...
Evaluation of the Evan’s and Bicaudate index for South Karnataka Population using computed tomography
Evaluation of the Evan’s and Bicaudate index for South Karnataka Population using computed tomography
Background: Radiological markers that are useful in the diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus include the Bicaudate index (BCI) and the Evans index (EI), which are practical i...
Effects of Brain Computer Interface-Robot System on upper limb function recovery in stroke patients: A Protocol Study for a Randomized Controlled Trial
Effects of Brain Computer Interface-Robot System on upper limb function recovery in stroke patients: A Protocol Study for a Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Background /ObjectiveWe developed a Brain Computer Interface(BCI) robot system for movement recovery of upper limb motor function in post-stroke patients with seve...

