Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A Comparison of the Success of Intubation Using C-MAC D-Blade and McGrath MAC X3 Blade Videolaryngoscopes during Double Lumen Tube Insertion in One-Lung Ventilation: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial
View through CrossRef
Objective: To compare the effects of C-MAC D-Blade and McGrath MAC X3 Blade videolaryngoscopes (VLs) during double lumen tube (DLT) insertion in one-lung ventilation (OLV) in patients who underwent chest surgery in terms of intubation durations, hemodynamic responses, and intubation-induced complications.
Materials and methods: Fifty patients aged 18−65 years who were scheduled for OLV were included in this study. The patients were divided randomly into two groups: a Storz C-MAC D-Blade VL group (C-MAC group, n = 25) and a McGrath MAC X3 Blade VL group (McGrath group, n = 25). The results of a preoperative airway assessment, number of intubation attempts and incidence of success at the first attempt, glottic view times, intubation times, Cormack−Lehane scores, percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scores, ease of intubation, comorbidities, hemodynamic responses, and adverse intubation-related events were recorded.
Results: The demographic characteristics and comorbidities of both groups were similar. The intubation characteristics of both groups were similar in terms of Cormack−Lehane scores, thyromental and intergingival distances, and POGO scores. In the C-MAC group, the glottic view times (p = 0.001) and intubation times (p = 0.001) were significantly shorter than those in the McGrath group. As shown by ease of intubation scores, ease of intubation in the C-MAC group was significantly better than that in the McGrath group (p = 0.001). All the patients in the C-MAC group were intubated at the first attempt, without a statistically significant difference. The two groups were similar with respect to intubation-related complications and hemodynamic responses (mean arterial pressure [MAP] and heart rate [HR]).
Conclusion: We conclude that the C-MAC D-Blade VL is more beneficial for airway management due to shorter glottic view and intubation times, high success rates at the first attempt, and ease of intubation in patients intubated with a DLT in OLV.
Title: A Comparison of the Success of Intubation Using C-MAC D-Blade and McGrath MAC X3 Blade Videolaryngoscopes during Double Lumen Tube Insertion in One-Lung Ventilation: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial
Description:
Objective: To compare the effects of C-MAC D-Blade and McGrath MAC X3 Blade videolaryngoscopes (VLs) during double lumen tube (DLT) insertion in one-lung ventilation (OLV) in patients who underwent chest surgery in terms of intubation durations, hemodynamic responses, and intubation-induced complications.
Materials and methods: Fifty patients aged 18−65 years who were scheduled for OLV were included in this study.
The patients were divided randomly into two groups: a Storz C-MAC D-Blade VL group (C-MAC group, n = 25) and a McGrath MAC X3 Blade VL group (McGrath group, n = 25).
The results of a preoperative airway assessment, number of intubation attempts and incidence of success at the first attempt, glottic view times, intubation times, Cormack−Lehane scores, percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scores, ease of intubation, comorbidities, hemodynamic responses, and adverse intubation-related events were recorded.
Results: The demographic characteristics and comorbidities of both groups were similar.
The intubation characteristics of both groups were similar in terms of Cormack−Lehane scores, thyromental and intergingival distances, and POGO scores.
In the C-MAC group, the glottic view times (p = 0.
001) and intubation times (p = 0.
001) were significantly shorter than those in the McGrath group.
As shown by ease of intubation scores, ease of intubation in the C-MAC group was significantly better than that in the McGrath group (p = 0.
001).
All the patients in the C-MAC group were intubated at the first attempt, without a statistically significant difference.
The two groups were similar with respect to intubation-related complications and hemodynamic responses (mean arterial pressure [MAP] and heart rate [HR]).
Conclusion: We conclude that the C-MAC D-Blade VL is more beneficial for airway management due to shorter glottic view and intubation times, high success rates at the first attempt, and ease of intubation in patients intubated with a DLT in OLV.
Related Results
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: Although traumatic chylothorax is predominantly associated with penetrating injuries, instances following blunt trauma, as a rare and challenging condition, ...
Advanced airway interventions in the trapped (racing) driver: a randomised cross-over trial
Advanced airway interventions in the trapped (racing) driver: a randomised cross-over trial
Casualty entrapment occurs in 12‐38.6% of road traffic incidents attended by advanced trauma teams. Half of those occupants sustaining severe trauma require advanced airway managem...
C-MAC D-Blade vs Airtraq for Intubation with Manual Inline Axial Stabilisation- A Randomised Clinical Trial
C-MAC D-Blade vs Airtraq for Intubation with Manual Inline Axial Stabilisation- A Randomised Clinical Trial
Introduction: One of the most important skills in anaesthesia is securing the airway with an endotracheal tube. Difficult tracheal intubation however is considered one of the major...
Comparing the Ease of Intubation between C-MAC, McGrath, and Conventional Macintosh Laryngoscope in a Simulated Difficult Airway of a Laerdal Mannequin
Comparing the Ease of Intubation between C-MAC, McGrath, and Conventional Macintosh Laryngoscope in a Simulated Difficult Airway of a Laerdal Mannequin
Tracheal intubation is an essential skill for doctors. Tracheal intubation is done in patients with questionable airway patency, poor respiratory drive, hypercarbia, or hypoxia. Th...
Efficacy of RAMA Mobile Video Laryngoscope (RAMA-mVL) Versus McGrath® for Tracheal Intubation in Manikin. A Randomized Study
Efficacy of RAMA Mobile Video Laryngoscope (RAMA-mVL) Versus McGrath® for Tracheal Intubation in Manikin. A Randomized Study
Background: Video laryngoscope (VL) has increased the success rate of intubation but the commercial VL is unaffordable for community hospitals. Therefore, Ramathibodi mobile VL (RA...
Comparison Between C-MAC Blade D Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Insertion of Double Lumen Tube in Patients Undergoing Elective Thoracic Surgeries
Comparison Between C-MAC Blade D Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Insertion of Double Lumen Tube in Patients Undergoing Elective Thoracic Surgeries
The insertion of a double lumen tube (DLT) for lung isolation during thoracic surgeries is technically challenging and may be associated with airway trauma and significant hemodyna...
Protocol and statistical analysis plan for the PREOXI trial of preoxygenation with noninvasive ventilation vs oxygen mask
Protocol and statistical analysis plan for the PREOXI trial of preoxygenation with noninvasive ventilation vs oxygen mask
ABSTRACT
Background
Hypoxemia is a common and life-threatening complication during emergency tracheal intubation of critically ...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...

