Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Paternalism to Partnership: The Administration of Indian Affairs, 1786–2021
View through CrossRef
Paternalism to Partnership provides a biographical sketch of each head of Indian affairs between 1786 and 2021 in context with each commissioner’s political philosophy. These administrators have been responsible for enforcing an Indian policy as directed by the president and/or the Congress but also influenced by their own political and social philosophy. From 1786-1848, authority was delegated to a superintendent of Indian affairs, a superintendent of the Indian trading houses, a superintendent of the Office of Indian Trade, a chief clerk, and a commissioner of Indian affairs, all of whom reported to the secretary of War. Since 1849, the commissioner of Indian affairs, and after 1977, the assistant secretary for Indian affairs have reported to the secretary of the Interior. Today, the BIA is administered by the assistant secretary for Indian affairs—all of whom have been Native Americans. Previous studies focused on the commissioners, completely overlooking the superintendents that preceded them and the colonial and early American antecedents. David DeJong’s documentary edition is the first to provide an understanding of the political philosophy of each head of the Indian bureau through the emphasis of policy.
Title: Paternalism to Partnership: The Administration of Indian Affairs, 1786–2021
Description:
Paternalism to Partnership provides a biographical sketch of each head of Indian affairs between 1786 and 2021 in context with each commissioner’s political philosophy.
These administrators have been responsible for enforcing an Indian policy as directed by the president and/or the Congress but also influenced by their own political and social philosophy.
From 1786-1848, authority was delegated to a superintendent of Indian affairs, a superintendent of the Indian trading houses, a superintendent of the Office of Indian Trade, a chief clerk, and a commissioner of Indian affairs, all of whom reported to the secretary of War.
Since 1849, the commissioner of Indian affairs, and after 1977, the assistant secretary for Indian affairs have reported to the secretary of the Interior.
Today, the BIA is administered by the assistant secretary for Indian affairs—all of whom have been Native Americans.
Previous studies focused on the commissioners, completely overlooking the superintendents that preceded them and the colonial and early American antecedents.
David DeJong’s documentary edition is the first to provide an understanding of the political philosophy of each head of the Indian bureau through the emphasis of policy.
Related Results
Pedagogical partnership in higher education institutions: expediency and capabilities
Pedagogical partnership in higher education institutions: expediency and capabilities
The article deals with the issues related to pedagogical partnership in higher education institutions. The author analyses its essence, the reason for its popularity in a number of...
The Success of MSMEs in Palm Oil Plantation Partnership Programs: A Case Study of PT “XYZ”
The Success of MSMEs in Palm Oil Plantation Partnership Programs: A Case Study of PT “XYZ”
This research aims to uncover the factors contributing to the success of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) within partnership programs. The study focuses on a population...
Paternalism
Paternalism
Restriction of people’s liberty of action is paternalistic when it is imposed for the good of those whose liberty is restricted and against their will. The argument in favour of pa...
Historical Analysis of the Legal Framework on Partnership Organizations in Nigeria and Innovations Introduced by Companies and Allied Matters Act 2020
Historical Analysis of the Legal Framework on Partnership Organizations in Nigeria and Innovations Introduced by Companies and Allied Matters Act 2020
The Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA) 2020 introduced two new forms of partnerships to the entire territory of the Federal Republic of Nigeria to wit: The Limited Liability P...
International paternalism and humanitarian governance
International paternalism and humanitarian governance
AbstractThis article argues that paternalism is an organizing principle of the international humanitarian order. The international community is increasingly organized to preserve, ...
METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PARTNERSHIP RELATIONS
METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO THE EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PARTNERSHIP RELATIONS
The objective prerequisites for the transition from a strategy of confrontation to partnership relations in a competitive struggle for the consumer predetermine the need for a clea...
Partnership Management, Supply Chain Collaboration, and Firm Innovation Performance: An Empirical Examination
Partnership Management, Supply Chain Collaboration, and Firm Innovation Performance: An Empirical Examination
Facing uncertain environments, firms have strived to achieve competitive advantage by partnership management and supply chain collaboration. The objective of the research is to unc...
Burden of the Beast
Burden of the Beast
Introduction
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and its fluctuating waves of infections and the emergence of new variants, Indigenous populations in Australia and worldwide have re...

