Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Archaeology of Empire in Achaemenid Egypt

View through CrossRef
This book is the first study of the material culture of Egypt during the period of Achaemenid Persian rule (ca. 526-404 B.C., also known as the ‘27th Dynasty’). Previous studies have characterised this period either as ephemeral and weak or oppressive and harsh. These characterisations, however, are based on the perceived lack of evidence for this period, filtered through ancient and modern preconceptions about the Persians. This book challenges these views in two ways: first, by assembling and analyzing the archaeological remains from this period, including temples, tombs, irrigation works, statues, stelae, sealings, drinking vessels and coins; and second, by using that material to study both the nature of Achaemenid rule, and how the people living in Egypt experienced that rule. The archaeological perspective permits the study of people from all walks of life, not just the elites who could afford to commission statues and; rather, by looking at the decisions made about material culture by a wide range of people in Egypt, it is possible to understand both how the Persians integrated Egypt into their empire, and how various individuals understood their roles in society during the course of this integration. It is thus a study of both imperialism and identity.
Edinburgh University Press
Title: Archaeology of Empire in Achaemenid Egypt
Description:
This book is the first study of the material culture of Egypt during the period of Achaemenid Persian rule (ca.
526-404 B.
C.
, also known as the ‘27th Dynasty’).
Previous studies have characterised this period either as ephemeral and weak or oppressive and harsh.
These characterisations, however, are based on the perceived lack of evidence for this period, filtered through ancient and modern preconceptions about the Persians.
This book challenges these views in two ways: first, by assembling and analyzing the archaeological remains from this period, including temples, tombs, irrigation works, statues, stelae, sealings, drinking vessels and coins; and second, by using that material to study both the nature of Achaemenid rule, and how the people living in Egypt experienced that rule.
The archaeological perspective permits the study of people from all walks of life, not just the elites who could afford to commission statues and; rather, by looking at the decisions made about material culture by a wide range of people in Egypt, it is possible to understand both how the Persians integrated Egypt into their empire, and how various individuals understood their roles in society during the course of this integration.
It is thus a study of both imperialism and identity.

Related Results

Achaemenid Settlement in Shiraz Plain: Tol-e Sefid Sadra
Achaemenid Settlement in Shiraz Plain: Tol-e Sefid Sadra
Shiraz plain is one of the most important plains adjacent to Persepolis. Tirazziš place have been mentioned in the Persepolis Archives many times. For further research on the place...
Clash of Superpowers: Dollar vs Ruble
Clash of Superpowers: Dollar vs Ruble
History tells us nothing is permanent. We live in an ocean of time, and its main virtue is 'Changing'. Today, you are a slave, tomorrow, you can be the master. Today you are Nikola...
Darius at the Bosporus
Darius at the Bosporus
As part of his Scythian campaign, Darius famously ordered the bridging of the Bosporus. Two stelai were erected to commemorate this feat, and although they did not survive even to...
The History of Computing in Iran (Persia)—Since the Achaemenid Empire
The History of Computing in Iran (Persia)—Since the Achaemenid Empire
Persia was the early name for the territory that is currently recognized as Iran. Iran’s proud history starts with the Achaemenid Empire, which began in the 6th century BCE (c. 550...
“Achaemenid Peace”: A Historiographical Construct and Achaemenid Imperial Ideology
“Achaemenid Peace”: A Historiographical Construct and Achaemenid Imperial Ideology
The article deals with the historiographical construct of the “Achaemenid Peace”, referred to by modern researchers as Pax Achaemenica (alternative designation — Pax Achaemenidica)...
The Persian Empire under the Achaemenid Dynasty, from Darius I to Darius III
The Persian Empire under the Achaemenid Dynasty, from Darius I to Darius III
Abstract Founded by Darius I, the Achaemenid Dynasty ruled over an empire stretching, at its greatest extent, from Libya to India, and from Central Asia and the Cauc...
The Athenian Empire in the Fourth Century BCE
The Athenian Empire in the Fourth Century BCE
Studying the Athenian empire has always been a bit of a paradox—“a tiny empire surrounded by a vast but narrow rampart of scholarship” (Morris 2005: 1). But in spite of all this s...
Nehemiah as a Mimic Man under the Achaemenid Empire: A Postcolonial Reading of Nehemiah 5
Nehemiah as a Mimic Man under the Achaemenid Empire: A Postcolonial Reading of Nehemiah 5
In this article, I argue that Nehemiah obliquely criticizes the Achaemenid Empire’s polity over subaltern societies in Neh 5. I will first explore Homi Bhabha’s main ideas such as ...

Back to Top