Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Nasal administration of a probiotic assemblage in allergic rhinitis: A randomised placebo‐controlled crossover trial

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Topical probiotics have been suggested as a treatment option for allergic rhinitis, as they may skew the immune response towards a beneficial type‐1 non‐allergic profile. So far observations in man have exclusively involved oral intake. The aim of this study was to examine whether a topical/nasal administration of a probiotic assemblage (PA) affects quality of life, symptoms and signs of allergic rhinitis in a nasal allergen challenge (NAC) model. Methods In a placebo‐controlled and crossover design, 24 patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis were randomised to topical/nasal administration with a PA of Lactobacillus   rhamnosus SP1, Lactobacillus   paracasei 101/37 and Lactococcus lactis L1A or placebo for 3 weeks. Participants and investigators were blind to treatment allocation. The last week of each treatment period was combined with a NAC series. Efficacy variables were “Mini‐Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire” (Mini‐RQLQ), “Total Nasal Symptom Score” (TNSS), “Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow” (PNIF) and “Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide” (FeNO). In addition, to assess whether or not the PA produced any pro‐inflammatory effect per se , soluble analytes were monitored in nasal lavage fluids. Finally, bacterial cultures, sampled using swabs from the middle nasal meatus, were assessed for the presence of the PA by MALDI‐TOF analysis. Results Administration of the PA did not produce any nasal symptoms (cf. placebo). An innate immune response was discerned within the PA run (cf. baseline), but no change in nasal lavage fluid levels of cytokines/mediators was observed cf. placebo except for IL‐17/IL‐17A (a minor increase in the PA run). Administration of the PA did neither affect Mini‐RQLQ, TNSS, PNIF nor FeNO. No evidence of persistent colonization was observed. Conclusions Topical/nasal administration of a PA comprising Lactobacillus   rhamnosus SP1, Lactobacillus   paracasei 101/37 and Lactococcus lactis L1A, while likely evoking a minor innate immune response yet being safe, does not affect quality of life, symptoms or signs of allergic rhinitis. Trial registration: not registered.
Title: Nasal administration of a probiotic assemblage in allergic rhinitis: A randomised placebo‐controlled crossover trial
Description:
Abstract Background Topical probiotics have been suggested as a treatment option for allergic rhinitis, as they may skew the immune response towards a beneficial type‐1 non‐allergic profile.
So far observations in man have exclusively involved oral intake.
The aim of this study was to examine whether a topical/nasal administration of a probiotic assemblage (PA) affects quality of life, symptoms and signs of allergic rhinitis in a nasal allergen challenge (NAC) model.
Methods In a placebo‐controlled and crossover design, 24 patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis were randomised to topical/nasal administration with a PA of Lactobacillus   rhamnosus SP1, Lactobacillus   paracasei 101/37 and Lactococcus lactis L1A or placebo for 3 weeks.
Participants and investigators were blind to treatment allocation.
The last week of each treatment period was combined with a NAC series.
Efficacy variables were “Mini‐Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire” (Mini‐RQLQ), “Total Nasal Symptom Score” (TNSS), “Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow” (PNIF) and “Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide” (FeNO).
In addition, to assess whether or not the PA produced any pro‐inflammatory effect per se , soluble analytes were monitored in nasal lavage fluids.
Finally, bacterial cultures, sampled using swabs from the middle nasal meatus, were assessed for the presence of the PA by MALDI‐TOF analysis.
Results Administration of the PA did not produce any nasal symptoms (cf.
placebo).
An innate immune response was discerned within the PA run (cf.
baseline), but no change in nasal lavage fluid levels of cytokines/mediators was observed cf.
placebo except for IL‐17/IL‐17A (a minor increase in the PA run).
Administration of the PA did neither affect Mini‐RQLQ, TNSS, PNIF nor FeNO.
No evidence of persistent colonization was observed.
Conclusions Topical/nasal administration of a PA comprising Lactobacillus   rhamnosus SP1, Lactobacillus   paracasei 101/37 and Lactococcus lactis L1A, while likely evoking a minor innate immune response yet being safe, does not affect quality of life, symptoms or signs of allergic rhinitis.
Trial registration: not registered.

Related Results

Probiotic therapy on children with allergic rhinitis
Probiotic therapy on children with allergic rhinitis
phils in nasal secretions of patients with allergic rhinitis may cause persistent nasal blockage. A common therapy for allergic rhinitis is oral or intranasal corticosteroids. Howe...
Allergic Rhinitis
Allergic Rhinitis
Importance Allergic rhinitis affects an estimated 15% of the US population (approximately 50 million individuals) and is associated with the presence of asthma,...
Rhinitis-Respect your nose
Rhinitis-Respect your nose
We all know the functions of nose i.e. breathing and smell. The outcome of breathing is to ventilate the lungs and we also know that there is lung compliance which reflects its eff...
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract Introduction Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
Persistent rhinitis – allergic or nonallergic?
Persistent rhinitis – allergic or nonallergic?
SummaryAlthough rhinitis has been classified as being either allergic, noninfectious, or ‘‘other forms’’ (nonallergic noninfectious), these categories lack strict classification cr...
Crossover Phenomena in Motor Evoked Potentials During Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring of Cranial Surgeries
Crossover Phenomena in Motor Evoked Potentials During Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring of Cranial Surgeries
Purpose: Transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) are used to assess the corticospinal tract during surgery. Transcranial motor evoked potentials are elicited by p...

Back to Top