Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Constructivism

View through CrossRef
Constructivist theory emerged in the mid-1990s as a serious challenge to the dominant realist and liberal theoretical paradigms. The theory was not popularized until Wendt 1992 (cited under Alexander Wendt) (a direct challenge to neorealism) and Katzenstein 1996 (cited under Identity) made it a staple of international relations (IR) syllabi around the world. The theory’s relatively recent arrival on the scene makes a constructivist canon somewhat harder to identify and makes the inclusion or exclusion of particular sources in this article a potentially much greater source of contention than in the articles on realism and liberalism. Constructivist theory emphasizes the meanings that are assigned to material objects, rather than the mere existence of the objects themselves. For example, a nuclear weapon in the United Kingdom and a nuclear weapon in North Korea may be materially identical (though, so far, they are not) but they possess radically different meanings for the United States. The belief that reality is socially constructed leads constructivists to place a greater role on norm development, identity, and ideational power than the other major theoretical paradigms. Indeed, norms, identity, and ideas are key factors in constructivist theory. The relationship between “Critical Theory of International Relations” or “Feminist Theories of International Relations”and constructivist IR theory is contested. However, for better or worse, the mainstream of the field situates both within a constructivist paradigm, as they share certain key features that are common to constructivism and are distinct from realism and liberalism. In addition, it could be argued that the “English School” belongs in this section. However, the placement of the English School in a solely realist, liberal, or constructivist framework could be considered quite controversial, as it has elements of all three paradigms. Therefore, the section on the English School is contained in the International Relations Theory article, and more extensively in the International Society article.
Title: Constructivism
Description:
Constructivist theory emerged in the mid-1990s as a serious challenge to the dominant realist and liberal theoretical paradigms.
The theory was not popularized until Wendt 1992 (cited under Alexander Wendt) (a direct challenge to neorealism) and Katzenstein 1996 (cited under Identity) made it a staple of international relations (IR) syllabi around the world.
The theory’s relatively recent arrival on the scene makes a constructivist canon somewhat harder to identify and makes the inclusion or exclusion of particular sources in this article a potentially much greater source of contention than in the articles on realism and liberalism.
Constructivist theory emphasizes the meanings that are assigned to material objects, rather than the mere existence of the objects themselves.
For example, a nuclear weapon in the United Kingdom and a nuclear weapon in North Korea may be materially identical (though, so far, they are not) but they possess radically different meanings for the United States.
The belief that reality is socially constructed leads constructivists to place a greater role on norm development, identity, and ideational power than the other major theoretical paradigms.
Indeed, norms, identity, and ideas are key factors in constructivist theory.
The relationship between “Critical Theory of International Relations” or “Feminist Theories of International Relations”and constructivist IR theory is contested.
However, for better or worse, the mainstream of the field situates both within a constructivist paradigm, as they share certain key features that are common to constructivism and are distinct from realism and liberalism.
In addition, it could be argued that the “English School” belongs in this section.
However, the placement of the English School in a solely realist, liberal, or constructivist framework could be considered quite controversial, as it has elements of all three paradigms.
Therefore, the section on the English School is contained in the International Relations Theory article, and more extensively in the International Society article.

Related Results

Constructivism
Constructivism
Originally proposed by sociologists of science, constructivism or social constructivism is a view about the nature of scientific knowledge held by many philosophers of science. Con...
Politics, Ethics, and Knowledge in the New Constructivism
Politics, Ethics, and Knowledge in the New Constructivism
Chapter Six addresses the question of constructivist ethics, which has emerged as a significant theme in the New Constructivism. Scholars have argued that relationalism and practic...
Introduction: What Is Constructivism?
Introduction: What Is Constructivism?
The introductory chapter lays out a framework for thinking about Constructivism in IR theory consistent with constructivist premises, and show why it matters by identifying the cor...
Rules, Law, and Language in the New Constructivism
Rules, Law, and Language in the New Constructivism
This chapter explores the continuing centrality of rules, law, and language to the New Constructivism, each of which were downplayed as constructivism developed in IR. Rules, law, ...
Pedagogi Konstruktivisme dalam Praksis Pendidikan Indonesia
Pedagogi Konstruktivisme dalam Praksis Pendidikan Indonesia
Constructivism is one of philosophy of knowledge that emphasizes that our knowledge is (shapes) construction of ourselves. Knowledge is not an idea of reality. Knowledge is always ...
Constructivism as a Foundation in Developing Physics Teaching Strategies
Constructivism as a Foundation in Developing Physics Teaching Strategies
The concept of constructivism has emerged as a key pedagogical approach that highlights the active role of students in constructing knowledge. This theory emphasizes learning throu...
The Old Constructivism
The Old Constructivism
This chapter revisits the classic texts of Constructivism from the 1990s and early 2000s. I show that many of their central insights still have much to offer current and prospectiv...
Conclusion: The Space of Constructivism
Conclusion: The Space of Constructivism
In reprising the volume, in the conclusion I distil what is distinctive about the New Constructivism, and emphasize why it is imperative to pronounce the New Constructivism’s exist...

Back to Top