Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Introducing a sustainability assessment index metric: a simplified sustainability assessment approach
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Sustainability is a broad concept that drives global efforts to mitigate climate change, reduce environmental impacts, and improve societal well-being. However, its practical application remains challenging, largely due to the absence of standardized sustainability assessment frameworks and reliable indices that consistently evaluate its impact across diverse sectors. This paper presents a structured sustainability assessment methodology that employs aggregated metrics to evaluate impacts across key sustainability categories. The methodology is implemented in a simplified assessment tool designed to assess the potential societal, environmental, and economic impacts of built environment projects. This tool enables informed decision-making by identifying potential consequences of proposed changes and ensuring that critical sustainability considerations are addressed. To overcome challenges associated with limited historical project data, the methodology integrates standardized evaluation questionnaires that capture potential impacts across essential sustainability categories. Evaluators assess both the type (positive or negative) and magnitude of each impact. The proposed Sustainability Assessment Index (SAI) balances impact across environmental, economic, and societal categories and quantifies the overall average sustainability impact on a scale from − 3 (most negative) to + 3 (most positive), with “NA” assigned for non-applicable indicators. In addition, a weighted sustainability assessment index (WSAI) and the multi-weight sustainability assessment index (MWSAI) are introduced, allowing evaluators to apply weighting coefficients to each impact based on its relative importance. The additional proposed refinements enhance the flexibility and robustness of the assessment as more data becomes available. This approach enables evaluators and stakeholders to assess, track, and benchmark sustainability impacts, identify areas for improvement, and support more sustainable decision-making in built environment projects. A case study of the Qatar Underground Metro Project is presented to demonstrate the practical application of this methodology, illustrating its potential to optimize sustainability assessment through a comprehensive analysis of societal, environmental, and economic impacts.
Title: Introducing a sustainability assessment index metric: a simplified sustainability assessment approach
Description:
Abstract
Sustainability is a broad concept that drives global efforts to mitigate climate change, reduce environmental impacts, and improve societal well-being.
However, its practical application remains challenging, largely due to the absence of standardized sustainability assessment frameworks and reliable indices that consistently evaluate its impact across diverse sectors.
This paper presents a structured sustainability assessment methodology that employs aggregated metrics to evaluate impacts across key sustainability categories.
The methodology is implemented in a simplified assessment tool designed to assess the potential societal, environmental, and economic impacts of built environment projects.
This tool enables informed decision-making by identifying potential consequences of proposed changes and ensuring that critical sustainability considerations are addressed.
To overcome challenges associated with limited historical project data, the methodology integrates standardized evaluation questionnaires that capture potential impacts across essential sustainability categories.
Evaluators assess both the type (positive or negative) and magnitude of each impact.
The proposed Sustainability Assessment Index (SAI) balances impact across environmental, economic, and societal categories and quantifies the overall average sustainability impact on a scale from − 3 (most negative) to + 3 (most positive), with “NA” assigned for non-applicable indicators.
In addition, a weighted sustainability assessment index (WSAI) and the multi-weight sustainability assessment index (MWSAI) are introduced, allowing evaluators to apply weighting coefficients to each impact based on its relative importance.
The additional proposed refinements enhance the flexibility and robustness of the assessment as more data becomes available.
This approach enables evaluators and stakeholders to assess, track, and benchmark sustainability impacts, identify areas for improvement, and support more sustainable decision-making in built environment projects.
A case study of the Qatar Underground Metro Project is presented to demonstrate the practical application of this methodology, illustrating its potential to optimize sustainability assessment through a comprehensive analysis of societal, environmental, and economic impacts.
Related Results
A comparative study of mappings in metric space and controlled metric space
A comparative study of mappings in metric space and controlled metric space
The objective of this paper is to present a comparative study of mapping in Metric Space and Controlled Metric Space. The study provides the structure, gap analysis and application...
Riemannian Curvature of a Sliced Contact Metric Manifold
Riemannian Curvature of a Sliced Contact Metric Manifold
Contact geometry become a more important issue in the mathematical world with the works which had done in the 19th century. Many mathematicians have made studies on contact manifol...
Concerning Fuzzy b-Metric Spaces †
Concerning Fuzzy b-Metric Spaces †
In an article published in 2015, Hussain et al. introduced a notion of a fuzzy b-metric space and obtained some fixed point theorems for this kind of space. Shortly thereafter, Năd...
Expansion mapping in controlled metric space and extended B-metric space
Expansion mapping in controlled metric space and extended B-metric space
This paper delves into the intricate study of expansion mappings within the frameworks of controlled metric spaces and extended B-metric spaces. Expansion mappings, known for their...
Least-squares reverse time migration via linearized waveform inversion using a Wasserstein metric
Least-squares reverse time migration via linearized waveform inversion using a Wasserstein metric
Least-squares reverse time migration (LSRTM), an effective tool for imaging the structures of the earth from seismograms, can be characterized as a linearized waveform inversion pr...
Comparing time to recovery in wasting treatment: simplified approach vs. standard protocol among children aged 6–59 months in Ethiopia—a cluster-randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial
Comparing time to recovery in wasting treatment: simplified approach vs. standard protocol among children aged 6–59 months in Ethiopia—a cluster-randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial
IntroductionWasting occurs when the body's nutritional needs are unmet due to insufficient intake or illness. It represents a significant global challenge, with approximately 45 mi...
Analysis of the Diagnostic Performance of a Simplified Rectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol in the Evaluation of Rectal Cancer
Analysis of the Diagnostic Performance of a Simplified Rectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol in the Evaluation of Rectal Cancer
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a simplified rectal MRI scanning protocol in the assessment of patients with rectal cancer.
Ma...
Improving Precision of Deformable Image Registration
Improving Precision of Deformable Image Registration
Deformable image registration (DIR) has various applications in medical image analysis such as in adaptive radiotherapy (ART) and multi-atlas segmentation. ART uses DIR to warp the...

