Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A 10-Year Retrospective Review of the Nonsurgical Treatment of Infant Ear Anomalies

View through CrossRef
Background: A review of a single surgeon’s 10-year experience treating congenital ear anomalies using nonsurgical ear molding is presented. This study assesses the efficacy of treating a variety of anomalies in infants with age ranging from younger than 1 week to 22 weeks and identifies potential barriers to care. Methods: A retrospective chart and photographic review of 246 consecutive infants treated with ear molding between 2010 and 2019 was undertaken. Data regarding patient demographics, anomaly classification, device selection, treatment duration, adverse events, and satisfaction with outcomes were collected. Results: This study included 385 infant ear anomalies in 246 patients. Median age at initiation of treatment was 16 days and median treatment duration was 29.5 days. A median number of three devices was needed to complete bilateral treatment. Treated anomalies included mixed deformity, helical rim, prominent, lidding/lop, Stahl ear, conchal crus, cupping, and cryptotia. Complications occurred in 47 patients, with skin breakdown being the most common [26 patients (55.3 percent)]. Satisfaction rate was 92 percent in 137 surveyed parents. Median patient household income was approximately $112,911, and treatment was covered by insurance for 244 of 246 patients. Conclusions: The study outcomes demonstrate that ear molding can be effective in patients as old as 22 weeks without compromising treatment duration or complexity. In addition, in the authors’ experience, molding is an effective treatment for the majority of infant ear deformities. Despite a steady increase in patient volume over the past 10 years and consistent coverage of treatment by insurance, the authors’ catchment area continues to be largely limited to affluent households. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.
Title: A 10-Year Retrospective Review of the Nonsurgical Treatment of Infant Ear Anomalies
Description:
Background: A review of a single surgeon’s 10-year experience treating congenital ear anomalies using nonsurgical ear molding is presented.
This study assesses the efficacy of treating a variety of anomalies in infants with age ranging from younger than 1 week to 22 weeks and identifies potential barriers to care.
Methods: A retrospective chart and photographic review of 246 consecutive infants treated with ear molding between 2010 and 2019 was undertaken.
Data regarding patient demographics, anomaly classification, device selection, treatment duration, adverse events, and satisfaction with outcomes were collected.
Results: This study included 385 infant ear anomalies in 246 patients.
Median age at initiation of treatment was 16 days and median treatment duration was 29.
5 days.
A median number of three devices was needed to complete bilateral treatment.
Treated anomalies included mixed deformity, helical rim, prominent, lidding/lop, Stahl ear, conchal crus, cupping, and cryptotia.
Complications occurred in 47 patients, with skin breakdown being the most common [26 patients (55.
3 percent)].
Satisfaction rate was 92 percent in 137 surveyed parents.
Median patient household income was approximately $112,911, and treatment was covered by insurance for 244 of 246 patients.
Conclusions: The study outcomes demonstrate that ear molding can be effective in patients as old as 22 weeks without compromising treatment duration or complexity.
In addition, in the authors’ experience, molding is an effective treatment for the majority of infant ear deformities.
Despite a steady increase in patient volume over the past 10 years and consistent coverage of treatment by insurance, the authors’ catchment area continues to be largely limited to affluent households.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Related Results

Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...
Prevention and Control Strategy
Prevention and Control Strategy
Ear diseases are considered as one of the common disorders in small animal practice and the number one cause for veterinary visits among dog owners. Commonly reported clinical sign...
Evolution of Anomaly-Specific Techniques in Infant Ear Molding: A 10-Year Retrospective Study
Evolution of Anomaly-Specific Techniques in Infant Ear Molding: A 10-Year Retrospective Study
Background: Congenital ear anomalies occur in at least one-third of the population, and less than one-third of cases self-correct. Ear molding is an alternative to surg...
Rhinitis-Respect your nose
Rhinitis-Respect your nose
We all know the functions of nose i.e. breathing and smell. The outcome of breathing is to ventilate the lungs and we also know that there is lung compliance which reflects its eff...
Entrapment Neuropathy Causing Persistent Headache Symptoms after Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty
Entrapment Neuropathy Causing Persistent Headache Symptoms after Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty
Background: The frequency of nonsurgical rhinoplasty has increased in recent years. The occurrence of headaches or migraine symptoms, and their treatment following nons...

Back to Top