Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Practice patterns, experiences, and challenges of German oncology health care staff with smoking cessation in patients with cancer: a cross-sectional survey study

View through CrossRef
Abstract Purpose Often, cancer patients do not receive education about the negative consequences of smoking on the treatment outcome. To support cancer patients in the process of smoking cessation, it is essential to involve oncology staff. This study aims to learn about the experiences and attitudes from the point of view of oncology staff and, thus, how a smoking intervention should be designed. The study aims to engage all oncology staff due to the unclear responsibility for providing smoking cessation education, support, and motivating cancer patients to quit smoking. Methods N = 354 German oncology staff (oncologists, nurses, psycho-oncologists, others) filled out a 5-point Likert scale–based questionnaire regarding practices, potential barriers, and attitudes towards smoking cessation between October 2021 and June 2022. The questionnaire was developed by Derksen et al. (2020), translated and slightly modified for the use of this study. It was distributed to all leading oncology staff in our Cancer Center Network with a request to share with all oncology staff. Flyers were also handed out in all oncology wards and outpatient clinics in the same Cancer Center Network. Results Most oncology staff ask cancer patients about their current smoking status (curative, M = 2.27; SD = 1.59; palliative, M = 2.90; SD = 1.83), but they rarely treat or refer patients for a smoking cessation intervention (curative, M = 4.78; SD = 1.20; palliative, M = 4.99; SD = 1.06). Smoking behavior of curative cancer patients is addressed more than that of palliative cancer patients (d =  − 37). Regression analyses of key dependent variables showed that profession, setting, and the belief that continued smoking affects treatment outcome explained the variance of asking patients if they smoke, advising to stop smoking and lack of time (without profession). Conclusion Involving oncology staff in motivating cancer patients who smoke to quit and referring them to smoking cessation services should take the different attitudes and knowledge of the staff into account to improve treatment that supports tobacco cessation. Implications for Cancer Survivors Cancer patients have special needs when it comes to a cessation program. In the long term, survivors will benefit from tailored smoking cessation education and services provided by oncology staff to help them quit smoking after a cancer diagnosis.
Title: Practice patterns, experiences, and challenges of German oncology health care staff with smoking cessation in patients with cancer: a cross-sectional survey study
Description:
Abstract Purpose Often, cancer patients do not receive education about the negative consequences of smoking on the treatment outcome.
To support cancer patients in the process of smoking cessation, it is essential to involve oncology staff.
This study aims to learn about the experiences and attitudes from the point of view of oncology staff and, thus, how a smoking intervention should be designed.
The study aims to engage all oncology staff due to the unclear responsibility for providing smoking cessation education, support, and motivating cancer patients to quit smoking.
Methods N = 354 German oncology staff (oncologists, nurses, psycho-oncologists, others) filled out a 5-point Likert scale–based questionnaire regarding practices, potential barriers, and attitudes towards smoking cessation between October 2021 and June 2022.
The questionnaire was developed by Derksen et al.
(2020), translated and slightly modified for the use of this study.
It was distributed to all leading oncology staff in our Cancer Center Network with a request to share with all oncology staff.
Flyers were also handed out in all oncology wards and outpatient clinics in the same Cancer Center Network.
Results Most oncology staff ask cancer patients about their current smoking status (curative, M = 2.
27; SD = 1.
59; palliative, M = 2.
90; SD = 1.
83), but they rarely treat or refer patients for a smoking cessation intervention (curative, M = 4.
78; SD = 1.
20; palliative, M = 4.
99; SD = 1.
06).
Smoking behavior of curative cancer patients is addressed more than that of palliative cancer patients (d =  − 37).
Regression analyses of key dependent variables showed that profession, setting, and the belief that continued smoking affects treatment outcome explained the variance of asking patients if they smoke, advising to stop smoking and lack of time (without profession).
Conclusion Involving oncology staff in motivating cancer patients who smoke to quit and referring them to smoking cessation services should take the different attitudes and knowledge of the staff into account to improve treatment that supports tobacco cessation.
Implications for Cancer Survivors Cancer patients have special needs when it comes to a cessation program.
In the long term, survivors will benefit from tailored smoking cessation education and services provided by oncology staff to help them quit smoking after a cancer diagnosis.

Related Results

Formerly Smoking and Currently Smoking Cancer Survivors’ View on Smoking Cessation – A Qualitative Study
Formerly Smoking and Currently Smoking Cancer Survivors’ View on Smoking Cessation – A Qualitative Study
Background Drastic life events, such as a cancer diagnosis, do not necessarily lead to a reduction in unhealthy and dysfunctional behaviors like smoking. Contin...
Varenicline Versus Cytisine for Smoking Cessation in a Primary Care Setting: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Varenicline Versus Cytisine for Smoking Cessation in a Primary Care Setting: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract Our study aims to implement a smoking cessation program using pharmacotherapy in a real-life setting — primary care practices in Croatia and Slovenia — and...
Implementing smoking cessation in routine primary care—a qualitative study
Implementing smoking cessation in routine primary care—a qualitative study
BackgroundThe use of digital tools has been proposed as a solution to some of the challenges of providing preventative services in primary care. Although there is a general accepta...
Smoking Cessation, Weight Change, and Risk of Dementia: A Prospective Cohort Study
Smoking Cessation, Weight Change, and Risk of Dementia: A Prospective Cohort Study
Abstract Objectives To assess the associations of smoking cessation and post-cessation weight gain with the risk of dementia an...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Evaluating the effect of smoking and its cessation on semen parameters
Evaluating the effect of smoking and its cessation on semen parameters
Our primary aim was to investigate the reversibility of the negative impact of smoking on male fertility. Secondarily, we studied the effect of both time after smoking cessation as...

Back to Top