Javascript must be enabled to continue!
V.M. KHVOSTOV AND THE MOSCOW INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (1917-1922)
View through CrossRef
The article analyzes the little-studied documents on the history of the Moscow Institute of Social Psychology, founded on the initiative of Veniamin Mikhailovich Khvostov (1868–1920), a professor of Moscow University, a neo-Kantian philosopher, a doctor of Roman law, a sociologist; the paper also discusses his role in the development of sociology, the most important direction in the field of social sciences. The article was written on the basis of the documents that were retained by his collaborators Leonty Alekseevich Byzov (1886–1942) and his wife, Natalia Nikolaevna Fadeeva-Byzova (1892–1985). Currently, the records are kept in the Archives of the European University in St. Petersburg. After having ostentatiously left Moscow University in 1911 (the “Kasso Case”), just like many of his colleagues had done, he taught at Moscow Women’s Higher Courses and at Shanyavsky Moscow People’s University. In May 1917, during the rule of the Provisional Government, V.M.Khvostov managed to create the Moscow Institute of Social Psychology as part of the future Institute of Sociology, the main task of which was to carry out research on social processes and gradually turn sociology into an independent scientific discipline. The Institute existed for five years only (1917–1922), and the last two years – without V.M. Khvostov, who passed away at the beginning of 1920. V.M. Khvostov realized that without sociology, the science of social processes, the sprouts of which had just begun to appear in Russia, not only the social sciences, but the entire scientific community of the early twentieth century would lose out. He hoped that with the coming to power of the Provisional Government, the social life in all its manifestations would become an important phenomenon, including scientific research, free from ideological dogmas. Instead in October 1917, the country plunged into a different reality – the revolution and the victory of the Bolsheviks who gradually destroyed all illusions about the freedom of scientific choice. And nevertheless, the Institute continued to carry out a tremendous amount of research concerning the socio-psychological processes and phenomena in public life. The scope of that work could be perceived through many hours of meetings, questionnaires and survey forms, abstracts and reports, scientific disputes, practical work with the representatives of various social groups. However, gradually, the conditions imposed by the Soviet government turned out to become such a powerful irritant for V.M. Khvostov that the dream of forming sociology as an independent scientific discipline appeared to be unrealizable. And yet, the documents on the activities of the Moscow Institute of Social Psychology are of great historical and scientific value, their study and publication can contribute to the adding of the new pages in the history of Russian and Soviet science at the beginning of the 20th century.
Title: V.M. KHVOSTOV AND THE MOSCOW INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (1917-1922)
Description:
The article analyzes the little-studied documents on the history of the Moscow Institute of Social Psychology, founded on the initiative of Veniamin Mikhailovich Khvostov (1868–1920), a professor of Moscow University, a neo-Kantian philosopher, a doctor of Roman law, a sociologist; the paper also discusses his role in the development of sociology, the most important direction in the field of social sciences.
The article was written on the basis of the documents that were retained by his collaborators Leonty Alekseevich Byzov (1886–1942) and his wife, Natalia Nikolaevna Fadeeva-Byzova (1892–1985).
Currently, the records are kept in the Archives of the European University in St.
Petersburg.
After having ostentatiously left Moscow University in 1911 (the “Kasso Case”), just like many of his colleagues had done, he taught at Moscow Women’s Higher Courses and at Shanyavsky Moscow People’s University.
In May 1917, during the rule of the Provisional Government, V.
M.
Khvostov managed to create the Moscow Institute of Social Psychology as part of the future Institute of Sociology, the main task of which was to carry out research on social processes and gradually turn sociology into an independent scientific discipline.
The Institute existed for five years only (1917–1922), and the last two years – without V.
M.
Khvostov, who passed away at the beginning of 1920.
V.
M.
Khvostov realized that without sociology, the science of social processes, the sprouts of which had just begun to appear in Russia, not only the social sciences, but the entire scientific community of the early twentieth century would lose out.
He hoped that with the coming to power of the Provisional Government, the social life in all its manifestations would become an important phenomenon, including scientific research, free from ideological dogmas.
Instead in October 1917, the country plunged into a different reality – the revolution and the victory of the Bolsheviks who gradually destroyed all illusions about the freedom of scientific choice.
And nevertheless, the Institute continued to carry out a tremendous amount of research concerning the socio-psychological processes and phenomena in public life.
The scope of that work could be perceived through many hours of meetings, questionnaires and survey forms, abstracts and reports, scientific disputes, practical work with the representatives of various social groups.
However, gradually, the conditions imposed by the Soviet government turned out to become such a powerful irritant for V.
M.
Khvostov that the dream of forming sociology as an independent scientific discipline appeared to be unrealizable.
And yet, the documents on the activities of the Moscow Institute of Social Psychology are of great historical and scientific value, their study and publication can contribute to the adding of the new pages in the history of Russian and Soviet science at the beginning of the 20th century.
Related Results
CLIMATE-2019 Program committee
CLIMATE-2019 Program committee
NOTITLE. Chairman
Mokhov Igor
RAS academecian, Dr. Sci., Professor
...
PUGWASH CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE AND WORLD AFFAIRS: CONTRIBUTION MADE BY VLADIMIR MIKHAILOVICH KHVOSTOV
PUGWASH CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE AND WORLD AFFAIRS: CONTRIBUTION MADE BY VLADIMIR MIKHAILOVICH KHVOSTOV
Purpose: The article deals with the research activities and interests of Vladimir Mikhailovich Khvostov, which were quite diverse. After analyzing numerous historiographical and ar...
HISTORY ОF CHINESE PSYCHOLOGY: OVERVIEW
HISTORY ОF CHINESE PSYCHOLOGY: OVERVIEW
Background. Th is material will be very useful for Russian scientists, as it will allow them to evaluate the achievements of Chinese psychology. Th e authors of the article believe...
International Relations at the Beginning of the XX Century in the Works of Vladimir Mikhailovich Khvostov
International Relations at the Beginning of the XX Century in the Works of Vladimir Mikhailovich Khvostov
Abstract
The article discusses the research activities of Vladimir Mikhailovich Khvostov, his creative legacy on issues and problems of international relations of the early ХХ cent...
History of the History of Psychology
History of the History of Psychology
Reflexivity has been a common theme in the literature on the history of psychology in recent years. Reflecting on the history of psychology is for historians of psychology the ulti...
Eleven Years of Psychological Researches in Pakistan (1995-2006): What Titles Reveal About Pakistani Research
Eleven Years of Psychological Researches in Pakistan (1995-2006): What Titles Reveal About Pakistani Research
This study analysed the themes of researches published in Pakistan. For the purpose, Pakistan Journal of Psychology (PJP) was selected as a representative of Pakistan’s research in...
DAMPAK TEKNOLOGI TERHADAP PROSES BELAJAR MENGAJAR
DAMPAK TEKNOLOGI TERHADAP PROSES BELAJAR MENGAJAR
DAFTAR PUSTAKAAditama, M. H. R., & Selfiardy, S. (2022). Kehidupan Mahasiswa Kuliah Sambil Bekerja di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Kidspedia: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 3(...
The History of High-Rise Construction in Moscow: Interdisciplinary Understanding and Geoinformational Analysis
The History of High-Rise Construction in Moscow: Interdisciplinary Understanding and Geoinformational Analysis
The article contains the results of a historical and geographical study using geographic information methods, focused on the spatial dynamics of high-rise construction in Moscow in...

