Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Peer Feedback in Reviewing Essay

View through CrossRef
Peer feedback is the comment or advice from equal partner, which can help the writer to improve their product of the writing. The aim of this study was to find out the types of peer feedback most frequently given by students in reviewing their classmates’ essay. The total participants of this study were 178 students of English education department. The data of this study was taken from peer feedback given by students in reviewing essay, which applied in the class of writing. The design of this study was descriptive quantitative. The peer feedback given by students in reviewing their classmates’ essay was analyzed and categorized based on Hyland and Hyland’s classification: praise, criticism, and suggestion. As the result, suggestion was most frequently given by students in reviewing essay because most of the students gave constructive comment or asking the improvement as their feedback rather than gave praise and criticism. It was seen that the total suggestion which given by students to the classmates was 208 feedback. Then, 108 praise was given which expressed the positive comments or positive impression, though there is some empty praise without constructive comments. 107 criticisms were also given by students in expressing their negative comment or dissatisfaction with the essay written by their classmates. In addition, some combinations of the feedback were also given in reviewing essay.  There are 30 combinations of praise and criticism, 51 combinations of praise and suggestion, and 25 combinations of criticism and suggestion. In conclusion, the reviewers expressed positive and negative comments, positive and constructive comments, the negative and constructive comments in same time.
Title: Peer Feedback in Reviewing Essay
Description:
Peer feedback is the comment or advice from equal partner, which can help the writer to improve their product of the writing.
The aim of this study was to find out the types of peer feedback most frequently given by students in reviewing their classmates’ essay.
The total participants of this study were 178 students of English education department.
The data of this study was taken from peer feedback given by students in reviewing essay, which applied in the class of writing.
The design of this study was descriptive quantitative.
The peer feedback given by students in reviewing their classmates’ essay was analyzed and categorized based on Hyland and Hyland’s classification: praise, criticism, and suggestion.
As the result, suggestion was most frequently given by students in reviewing essay because most of the students gave constructive comment or asking the improvement as their feedback rather than gave praise and criticism.
It was seen that the total suggestion which given by students to the classmates was 208 feedback.
Then, 108 praise was given which expressed the positive comments or positive impression, though there is some empty praise without constructive comments.
107 criticisms were also given by students in expressing their negative comment or dissatisfaction with the essay written by their classmates.
In addition, some combinations of the feedback were also given in reviewing essay.
  There are 30 combinations of praise and criticism, 51 combinations of praise and suggestion, and 25 combinations of criticism and suggestion.
In conclusion, the reviewers expressed positive and negative comments, positive and constructive comments, the negative and constructive comments in same time.

Related Results

An epistemic justice account of students’ experiences of feedback
An epistemic justice account of students’ experiences of feedback
I am a storyteller. I believe in the power of stories to share experiences and to elucidate thoughts and ideas and to help us to make sense of complex social practices. This thesis...
Designing rich feedback encounters
Designing rich feedback encounters
Feedback is a cornerstone of effective learning, yet it remains one of the most persistently complex challenges in higher education, for educators and students alike. This workshop...
Challenges faced in the peer review system in open access journals
Challenges faced in the peer review system in open access journals
The whole mechanism of academic journal’s peer review system process effectively depends on how editors manage the journal work. The handling of the peer review system will determi...
Identifying Patterns and Motivations of ‘Mega’ Peer-Reviewers
Identifying Patterns and Motivations of ‘Mega’ Peer-Reviewers
Abstract Background. The demand for peer reviewers is disproportionate to the supply and availability of reviewers. Identifying the factors associated with peer review beha...
Peer feedback in second language writing (2005–2014)
Peer feedback in second language writing (2005–2014)
This article reviews research on peer feedback in second language (L2) writing published in the last decade (i.e. 2005–2014). We analyse first the theoretical underpinnings that ha...
Critical Peer Feedback for Oral Presentation at TEFL Tertiary Education: Comparison, Perception and Reflection
Critical Peer Feedback for Oral Presentation at TEFL Tertiary Education: Comparison, Perception and Reflection
Critical peer feedback is regarded as an effective means to facilitate quality of peer feedback in TEFL class. In this study, a comparative study was conducted between two experime...
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Abstract The rapid growth of open access publishing (OAP) has significantly improved the accessibility and dissemination of scientific knowledge. However, this expansion has also c...

Back to Top