Javascript must be enabled to continue!
P3364Cardiac damage in a real-world severe aortic stenosis population
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Introduction
The cardiac consequences of aortic stenosis, besides left ventricular ejection fraction and systolic pulmonary artery pressure, aren't considered in the recommendations for surgical intervention in patients (pts) with severe aortic stenosis (SAS). In 2017, a new staging echo classification was presented to accurately describe them.
Purpose
To evaluate this new echo classification in risk stratification of pts with SAS with or without AVR, in a real–world setting.
Methods
Retrospective cohort study of pts with SAS (mean transvalvular pressure gradient (MG) ≥40 mmHg or a peak transvalvular velocity (PTV) ≥4.0 m/s), examined between January 2014 and December 2016. Pts were classified according to the new staging echo classification (no extravalvular cardiac damage - Stage 0, left ventricular damage - Stage 1, left atrial or mitral valve damage - Stage 2, pulmonary vasculature or tricuspid valve damage - Stage 3, or right ventricular damage - Stage 4). Follow-up (FU) was 2.6±1.0 years. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization.
Results
212 pts with SAS were included (age 76.1±9.1 years, 31.6% men; aortic valve area 0.69±0.21cm2; PTV 4.5±0.4m/s; MG 48.5±11.6mmHg; LVEF 58.8±12.2%).
19 (9.0%) pts were classified as Stage 0, 29 (13.7%) as Stage 1, 129 (60.8%) as Stage 2, 12 (5.7%) as Stage 3 and 23 (10.8%) as Stage 4.
Pts with more advanced stages had more events (stage 0: 5.3%; stage 1: 10.3%; stage 2: 17.1%; stage 3: 50.0%; stage 4: 52.2%; p<0.0001). In the multivariate analysis, the classification system was also a predictor of the outcome, even when including the AVR in the model (table 1).
Similar findings in the uni and multivariate analysis were identified when analyzing only the pts with SAS and no aortic intervention (events in stage 0: 16.7%; stage 1: 18.2%; stage 2: 29.3%; stage 3: 75.0%; stage 4: 64.7%, p<0.005; Figure 1).
Table 1. Predictors of the outcome Variables Adjusted HR (95% CI) p-value Sex* 1.86 (1.01–3.44) 0.047 eGFR* 0.99 (0.98–1.01) 0.201 AVR* 8.97 (3.85–20.90) 0.0001 Classification* – 0.031 Stage 0 0.19 (0.02–1.537) 0.120 Stage 1 0.28 (0.08–1.01) 0.052 Stage 2 0.36 (0.17–0.74) 0,006 Stage 3 0.81 (0.30–2.19) 0.675 Stage 4 1 – *Variables with p<0.05 in univariate analysis.
Figure 1. Survival of SAS pts with no AVR
Conclusion
In a real-world experience, the new staging echo classification showed a significant relationship between the extent of cardiac damage at baseline and the primary outcome in pts with SAS, even after controlling for AVR. This classification was also able to identify the SAS pts who did not perform AVR and had a significant risk of adverse events.
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: P3364Cardiac damage in a real-world severe aortic stenosis population
Description:
Abstract
Introduction
The cardiac consequences of aortic stenosis, besides left ventricular ejection fraction and systolic pulmonary artery pressure, aren't considered in the recommendations for surgical intervention in patients (pts) with severe aortic stenosis (SAS).
In 2017, a new staging echo classification was presented to accurately describe them.
Purpose
To evaluate this new echo classification in risk stratification of pts with SAS with or without AVR, in a real–world setting.
Methods
Retrospective cohort study of pts with SAS (mean transvalvular pressure gradient (MG) ≥40 mmHg or a peak transvalvular velocity (PTV) ≥4.
0 m/s), examined between January 2014 and December 2016.
Pts were classified according to the new staging echo classification (no extravalvular cardiac damage - Stage 0, left ventricular damage - Stage 1, left atrial or mitral valve damage - Stage 2, pulmonary vasculature or tricuspid valve damage - Stage 3, or right ventricular damage - Stage 4).
Follow-up (FU) was 2.
6±1.
0 years.
The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization.
Results
212 pts with SAS were included (age 76.
1±9.
1 years, 31.
6% men; aortic valve area 0.
69±0.
21cm2; PTV 4.
5±0.
4m/s; MG 48.
5±11.
6mmHg; LVEF 58.
8±12.
2%).
19 (9.
0%) pts were classified as Stage 0, 29 (13.
7%) as Stage 1, 129 (60.
8%) as Stage 2, 12 (5.
7%) as Stage 3 and 23 (10.
8%) as Stage 4.
Pts with more advanced stages had more events (stage 0: 5.
3%; stage 1: 10.
3%; stage 2: 17.
1%; stage 3: 50.
0%; stage 4: 52.
2%; p<0.
0001).
In the multivariate analysis, the classification system was also a predictor of the outcome, even when including the AVR in the model (table 1).
Similar findings in the uni and multivariate analysis were identified when analyzing only the pts with SAS and no aortic intervention (events in stage 0: 16.
7%; stage 1: 18.
2%; stage 2: 29.
3%; stage 3: 75.
0%; stage 4: 64.
7%, p<0.
005; Figure 1).
Table 1.
Predictors of the outcome Variables Adjusted HR (95% CI) p-value Sex* 1.
86 (1.
01–3.
44) 0.
047 eGFR* 0.
99 (0.
98–1.
01) 0.
201 AVR* 8.
97 (3.
85–20.
90) 0.
0001 Classification* – 0.
031 Stage 0 0.
19 (0.
02–1.
537) 0.
120 Stage 1 0.
28 (0.
08–1.
01) 0.
052 Stage 2 0.
36 (0.
17–0.
74) 0,006 Stage 3 0.
81 (0.
30–2.
19) 0.
675 Stage 4 1 – *Variables with p<0.
05 in univariate analysis.
Figure 1.
Survival of SAS pts with no AVR
Conclusion
In a real-world experience, the new staging echo classification showed a significant relationship between the extent of cardiac damage at baseline and the primary outcome in pts with SAS, even after controlling for AVR.
This classification was also able to identify the SAS pts who did not perform AVR and had a significant risk of adverse events.
Related Results
Critical Arterial Stenosis Revisited
Critical Arterial Stenosis Revisited
Abstract
Introduction
Stenosis of an organ/tissue primary artery can produce ischemia or only reduce blood flow reserve. Despit...
Blood pressure, hypertension, and the risk of aortic aneurysm in the UK Biobank
Blood pressure, hypertension, and the risk of aortic aneurysm in the UK Biobank
Abstract
Background
Although an association between elevated blood pressure and risk of aortic aneurysm is established, f...
Acquired Supravalvular Aortic Stenosis: Review of a Rare Conundrum with Diverse Etiologies
Acquired Supravalvular Aortic Stenosis: Review of a Rare Conundrum with Diverse Etiologies
Background
Supravalvular aortic stenosis is a rare form of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Classically, supravalvular aortic stenosis occurs seconda...
AORTIC ROOT ANEURYSM OR ECTASIA TREATED WITH AORTIC ROOT WRAPPED PROCEDURE
AORTIC ROOT ANEURYSM OR ECTASIA TREATED WITH AORTIC ROOT WRAPPED PROCEDURE
Objectives
To develop a relatively simple and effective and less risk operation, aortic root wrapped procedure, to treat with aortic root aneurysm or ectasia.
...
Perspective Chapter: Lipoprotein (a), Cardiac Amyloidosis, and Aortic Stenosis - Underestimated Associations
Perspective Chapter: Lipoprotein (a), Cardiac Amyloidosis, and Aortic Stenosis - Underestimated Associations
This chapter aims to address two peculiar aspects of pathophysiology and clinical management of aortic valve stenosis, such as coexistence with cardiac amyloidosis and association ...
Aortic root wrapped procedure
Aortic root wrapped procedure
Objective
To develop a relatively simple and effective and less risk operation, aortic root wrapped procedure, to treat with aortic root aneurysm or ectasia.
...
Echocardiographic Morphological Classification of Aortic Stenosis in Sulaimani Pediatric Teaching Hospital/Kurdistan/Iraq
Echocardiographic Morphological Classification of Aortic Stenosis in Sulaimani Pediatric Teaching Hospital/Kurdistan/Iraq
Aortic stenosis occurs when the heart's aortic valve narrows. This narrowing prevents the valve from opening fully, which obstructs blood flow from the heart into the aorta and onw...
Pulmonary vein stenosis post cryo AF ablation using single shot 4-minute freeze technique
Pulmonary vein stenosis post cryo AF ablation using single shot 4-minute freeze technique
Abstract
Funding Acknowledgements
Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Magdi Yacoub foundation
...

