Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

St. Maximus the Confessor's "Questions and Doubts"

View through CrossRef
This translation of the Quaestiones et Dubia presents for the first time in English one of the Confessor's most significant contributions to early Christian biblical interpretation. Maximus the Confessor (580–662) was a monk whose writings focused on ascetical interpretations of biblical and patristic works. For his refusal to accept the Monothelite position supported by Emperor Constans II, he was tried as a heretic, his right hand was cut off, and his tongue was cut out. In his work, Maximus the Confessor brings together the patristic exegetical aporiai tradition and the spiritual-pedagogical tradition of monastic questions and responses. The overarching theme is the importance of the ascetical life. For Maximus, askesis is a lifelong endeavor that consists of the struggle and discipline to maintain control over the passions. One engages in the ascetical life by taking part in both theoria (contemplation) and praxis (action). To convey this teaching, Maximus uses a number of pedagogical tools including allegory, etymology, number symbolism, and military terminology. A rich historical and contextual background is provided in the introduction to help ground and familiarize the reader with this work.
Cornell University Press
Title: St. Maximus the Confessor's "Questions and Doubts"
Description:
This translation of the Quaestiones et Dubia presents for the first time in English one of the Confessor's most significant contributions to early Christian biblical interpretation.
Maximus the Confessor (580–662) was a monk whose writings focused on ascetical interpretations of biblical and patristic works.
For his refusal to accept the Monothelite position supported by Emperor Constans II, he was tried as a heretic, his right hand was cut off, and his tongue was cut out.
In his work, Maximus the Confessor brings together the patristic exegetical aporiai tradition and the spiritual-pedagogical tradition of monastic questions and responses.
The overarching theme is the importance of the ascetical life.
For Maximus, askesis is a lifelong endeavor that consists of the struggle and discipline to maintain control over the passions.
One engages in the ascetical life by taking part in both theoria (contemplation) and praxis (action).
To convey this teaching, Maximus uses a number of pedagogical tools including allegory, etymology, number symbolism, and military terminology.
A rich historical and contextual background is provided in the introduction to help ground and familiarize the reader with this work.

Related Results

Guest Editors’ Note
Guest Editors’ Note
We are most thankful to Forum Philosophicum, and its Editor-in-Chief Marcin Podbielski, for the invitation to act as guest editors in a special issue dedicated to looking at Maximu...
An Infallible Theologian? : Understanding Gregory Nazianzen’s Authority in Maximus the Confessor
An Infallible Theologian? : Understanding Gregory Nazianzen’s Authority in Maximus the Confessor
Abstract: Maximus the Confessor discloses his most wide-ranging theological speculations in the genre of commentary, a practice understudied and partially misunderstood. To underst...
SOBRESSEMEADURA DE GRAMÍNEAS EM SOJA EM SISTEMAS INTEGRADOS DE PRODUÇÃO AGROPECUÁRIA
SOBRESSEMEADURA DE GRAMÍNEAS EM SOJA EM SISTEMAS INTEGRADOS DE PRODUÇÃO AGROPECUÁRIA
A sobressemeadura de forrageiras é uma técnica que permite a semeadura sobre culturas anuais estabelecidas; com isso, ganha-se tempo de estabelecimento ao final do ciclo da soja, g...
St. Maximus the confessor’s Quaestiones et dubia Translation
St. Maximus the confessor’s Quaestiones et dubia Translation
This chapter provides the first English language translation of Maximus the Confessor's Quaestiones et Dubia, a series of 239 questions and responses found in Jose Declerck's Quaes...
Contemplating the Monad Who Saves Us: Maximus the Confessor and John of Damascus on Divine Simplicity
Contemplating the Monad Who Saves Us: Maximus the Confessor and John of Damascus on Divine Simplicity
AbstractDaley explores divine simplicity according to Maximus the Confessor and John of Damascus, grounding his account in their classical philosophical antecedents. He notes that ...
Maximus the Confessor
Maximus the Confessor
The current landscape of virtue epistemology is ripe with possibilities for theological engagement and appropriation. Constructively speaking, Maximus the Confessor (580–662 ce) is...
Maximus the Confessor and Christological Realization
Maximus the Confessor and Christological Realization
Although Maximus hardly ever invokes the word “hierarchy” directly, he adopts the Dionysian concept of hierarchy as a theological given and draws on it to facilitate his own theolo...
Spin doctor of conscience? The royal confessor and the Christian prince
Spin doctor of conscience? The royal confessor and the Christian prince
This article examines the role of royal confessors as counsellors in early modern France and Spain. The starting point is the normative concept of the confessor within Bellarmine's...

Back to Top