Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Optimum timing of lung resection surgery following SARS‐CoV‐2 infection for non‐small cell lung cancer
View through CrossRef
AbstractBackgroundThe impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection on postoperative recovery of non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is need to be understood, thereby informing the optimal timing of surgical decision‐making during the COVID‐19 pandemic for NSCLC patients. This study reports the postoperative outcomes of surgical NSCLC patients with preoperative SARS‐CoV‐2 infection.MethodThis single‐center retrospective cohort study included 241 NSCLC patients who underwent lobectomy or sub‐lobectomy between December 1, 2022 and February 14, 2023. Surgical outcomes of patients with preoperative SARS‐CoV‐2 infection (stratified by the time from diagnosis of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection to surgery) were compared with those without preoperative SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. The primary outcomes were total postoperative complications and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), the secondary outcomes included operation time, total postoperative drainage and time, length of hospital stay (LOS), 30‐day and 90‐day postoperative symptoms.ResultsThis study included 153 (63.5%) patients with preoperative SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and 88 (36.5%) patients without previous SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. In patients with a preoperative SARS‐CoV‐2 diagnosis, the incidence of total postoperative complications (OR, 3.00; 95% CI, 1.12–8.01; p = 0.028) and PPCs (OR, 4.20; 95% CI, 1.11–15.91; p = 0.035) both increased in patients infected having surgery within 2 weeks compared with non‐infection before surgery. However, patients who underwent lung resection more than 2 weeks after SARS‐CoV‐2 diagnosis had a similar risk of postoperative complications and surgical outcomes with those non‐infection before surgery.ConclusionThis is the first study to provide evidence regarding the optimum timing of lung resection surgery and assessing early outcomes after surgery in NSCLC patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Our study documents that the SARS‐CoV‐2 infection did not complicate surgical procedures for lung cancer, and suggest that lung surgery should be postponed at least 2 weeks after SARS‐CoV‐2 infection for NSCLC patients.
Title: Optimum timing of lung resection surgery following SARS‐CoV‐2 infection for non‐small cell lung cancer
Description:
AbstractBackgroundThe impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection on postoperative recovery of non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is need to be understood, thereby informing the optimal timing of surgical decision‐making during the COVID‐19 pandemic for NSCLC patients.
This study reports the postoperative outcomes of surgical NSCLC patients with preoperative SARS‐CoV‐2 infection.
MethodThis single‐center retrospective cohort study included 241 NSCLC patients who underwent lobectomy or sub‐lobectomy between December 1, 2022 and February 14, 2023.
Surgical outcomes of patients with preoperative SARS‐CoV‐2 infection (stratified by the time from diagnosis of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection to surgery) were compared with those without preoperative SARS‐CoV‐2 infection.
The primary outcomes were total postoperative complications and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), the secondary outcomes included operation time, total postoperative drainage and time, length of hospital stay (LOS), 30‐day and 90‐day postoperative symptoms.
ResultsThis study included 153 (63.
5%) patients with preoperative SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and 88 (36.
5%) patients without previous SARS‐CoV‐2 infection.
In patients with a preoperative SARS‐CoV‐2 diagnosis, the incidence of total postoperative complications (OR, 3.
00; 95% CI, 1.
12–8.
01; p = 0.
028) and PPCs (OR, 4.
20; 95% CI, 1.
11–15.
91; p = 0.
035) both increased in patients infected having surgery within 2 weeks compared with non‐infection before surgery.
However, patients who underwent lung resection more than 2 weeks after SARS‐CoV‐2 diagnosis had a similar risk of postoperative complications and surgical outcomes with those non‐infection before surgery.
ConclusionThis is the first study to provide evidence regarding the optimum timing of lung resection surgery and assessing early outcomes after surgery in NSCLC patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection.
Our study documents that the SARS‐CoV‐2 infection did not complicate surgical procedures for lung cancer, and suggest that lung surgery should be postponed at least 2 weeks after SARS‐CoV‐2 infection for NSCLC patients.
Related Results
The Potential of Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds in the Fight Against COVID-19
The Potential of Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds in the Fight Against COVID-19
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a novel coronavirus , is causing a serious worldwide COVID-19 pandemic. The emergence of strains with rapid spread and...
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
The Hidden Problem of Cross-Reactivity: Challenges in HIV Testing During the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review
The Hidden Problem of Cross-Reactivity: Challenges in HIV Testing During the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) surface glycoproteins, including shared epitope motifs, sho...
Kinetics of the humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2: comparative analytical performance of seven commercial serology tests
Kinetics of the humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2: comparative analytical performance of seven commercial serology tests
Abstract
Background
SARS-CoV-2 serology tests are clinically useful to document a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with n...
P-003 Impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on circulating male sex hormones and human semen quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
P-003 Impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on circulating male sex hormones and human semen quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Study question
Does SARS-CoV-2 infection alter human male sex steroid hormones and semen quality?
...
Abstract 787: SARS-COV-2 P.1 strain infection in lung, breast and colon tumoral patient-derived organoids
Abstract 787: SARS-COV-2 P.1 strain infection in lung, breast and colon tumoral patient-derived organoids
Abstract
Coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19), caused by the newly identified strain of the coronavirus family capable of inducing acute respiratory syndrome, rapidly...
Mutations in SARS-CoV
Mutations in SARS-CoV
The coronavirus family is named for the large spike protein molecules found
on the pathogen exterior, which give the virus a crown-like appearance, the coronavirus
genome is the bi...
From SARS and MERS CoVs to SARS‐CoV‐2: Moving toward more biased codon usage in viral structural and nonstructural genes
From SARS and MERS CoVs to SARS‐CoV‐2: Moving toward more biased codon usage in viral structural and nonstructural genes
AbstractBackgroundSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) is an emerging disease with fatal outcomes. In this study, a fundamental knowledge gap question is to...

