Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Reliable Identification of Homodimers Using AlphaFold

View through CrossRef
Abstract Motivation Protein-protein interactions are central for understanding biological processes. The ability to predict interaction partners is extremely valuable for avoiding costly, time-consuming experiments. It has been shown that AlphaFold has an unsurpassed ability to accurately evaluate interacting protein pairs. However, a protein can also form homomeric interactions, i.e. interact with itself. Results We found that AlphaFold yielded a significantly higher false-positive rate for identifying homodimers than for heterodimers. True Positive Rate (TPR) at 1% False Positive Rate (FPR) drops from 63% for heterodimers to 18% for homodimers. When we investigated the high-scoring false positives, i.e., non-homodimers with high AlphaFold scores when predicted as such, we found that their homologs were enriched for homomultimeric proteins. Using a simple logistic regression model that combines AlphaFold scores with structural and homology information, we increased the TPR (at 1% FPR) to 42±8% (5-fold cross-validation) from 19%. If we excluded the homology information, we achieved a TPR of 28±7%, which is still better than using AlphaFold metrics. Availability and implementation All data are available from Zenodo DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17738668 and all code from https://github.com/SarahND97/alphafold-homodimers . Supplementary information Supplementary information is available online.
Title: Reliable Identification of Homodimers Using AlphaFold
Description:
Abstract Motivation Protein-protein interactions are central for understanding biological processes.
The ability to predict interaction partners is extremely valuable for avoiding costly, time-consuming experiments.
It has been shown that AlphaFold has an unsurpassed ability to accurately evaluate interacting protein pairs.
However, a protein can also form homomeric interactions, i.
e.
interact with itself.
Results We found that AlphaFold yielded a significantly higher false-positive rate for identifying homodimers than for heterodimers.
True Positive Rate (TPR) at 1% False Positive Rate (FPR) drops from 63% for heterodimers to 18% for homodimers.
When we investigated the high-scoring false positives, i.
e.
, non-homodimers with high AlphaFold scores when predicted as such, we found that their homologs were enriched for homomultimeric proteins.
Using a simple logistic regression model that combines AlphaFold scores with structural and homology information, we increased the TPR (at 1% FPR) to 42±8% (5-fold cross-validation) from 19%.
If we excluded the homology information, we achieved a TPR of 28±7%, which is still better than using AlphaFold metrics.
Availability and implementation All data are available from Zenodo DOI: 10.
5281/zenodo.
17738668 and all code from https://github.
com/SarahND97/alphafold-homodimers .
Supplementary information Supplementary information is available online.

Related Results

Assessment of AlphaFold structures and optimization methods for virtual screening
Assessment of AlphaFold structures and optimization methods for virtual screening
Abstract Recent advancements in artificial intelligence such as AlphaFold, have enabled more accurate prediction of protein three-dimensional structure from amino a...
To pack or not to pack: revisiting protein side-chain packing in the post‐AlphaFold era
To pack or not to pack: revisiting protein side-chain packing in the post‐AlphaFold era
Motivation: Protein side-chain packing (PSCP), the problem of predicting side-chain conformation given a fixed backbone structure, has important implications in modeling of structu...
To pack or not to pack: revisiting protein side-chain packing in the post-AlphaFold era
To pack or not to pack: revisiting protein side-chain packing in the post-AlphaFold era
Abstract Protein side-chain packing (PSCP), the problem of predicting side-chain conformations given a fixed backbone structure, has important implications in the...
Boosting Protein-Protein Interaction Detection with AlphaFold Multimer and Transformers
Boosting Protein-Protein Interaction Detection with AlphaFold Multimer and Transformers
Abstract In 2021, DeepMind released AlphaFold 2, an AI-driven algorithm that revolutionized protein folding predictions by achieving error rates comparable to tradi...
Improved Multimer Prediction using Massive Sampling with AlphaFold in CASP15
Improved Multimer Prediction using Massive Sampling with AlphaFold in CASP15
AlphaFold has transformed structure prediction by enabling highly accurate predictions on par with experimentally determined structures. Still, for difficult cases, in particular, ...
Has AlphaFold 3 reached its success for RNAs?
Has AlphaFold 3 reached its success for RNAs?
Predicting the 3D structure of RNA is a significant challenge despite ongoing advancements in the field. Although AlphaFold has successfully addressed this problem for proteins, RN...
AlphaFold 3 captures oligomeric states and interaction dynamics of MLO ion channels
AlphaFold 3 captures oligomeric states and interaction dynamics of MLO ion channels
Abstract Mildew resistance Locus O (MLO) proteins have been originally identified as susceptibility factors for the fungal powdery mildew disease. Beyond immunity, ...
Reliable protein-protein docking with AlphaFold, Rosetta, and replica-exchange
Reliable protein-protein docking with AlphaFold, Rosetta, and replica-exchange
Abstract Despite the recent breakthrough of AlphaFold (AF) in the field of protein sequence-to-structure prediction, modeling protein interfaces and predicting prot...

Back to Top