Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Part Nine
View through CrossRef
Demea gets his chance to produce his a priori proof for God’s existence. It starts out looking like a cosmological argument and finishes as an ontological one. His argument is modeled on the version offered by Samuel Clarke in his Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God. Cleanthes, rejecting a priori arguments, is given criticisms drawn from Hume’s Enquiry.
Title: Part Nine
Description:
Demea gets his chance to produce his a priori proof for God’s existence.
It starts out looking like a cosmological argument and finishes as an ontological one.
His argument is modeled on the version offered by Samuel Clarke in his Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God.
Cleanthes, rejecting a priori arguments, is given criticisms drawn from Hume’s Enquiry.

