Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Frontier communities of Southern Ukraine in the 18th – early 19th century: a response to empires

View through CrossRef
The article proposes the analysis of new practices of the frontier population of the Southern Ukrainian region during the formation of the linear border and the attempts of the Russian and Ottoman Empires to control frontier communities and territories. It is shown that the boundary line did not actually divide, but rather united frontier corporations in developing a joint response to attempts at intervention by government institutions. From the beginning of the 18 century. The Zaporozhіan Sich and the Crimean Khanate united and worked out similar solutions to solve the problem of active military presence and interference in their own internal affairs by imperial structures. Joint resistance to the intentions of Russian and Ottoman officials from the Crimean Khan and the Kosh otaman of Zaporozhian Sich due to the establishment of delimitation signs in 1705 began a new tradition. Imperial governments had not only to reckon with the wishes of frontier communities, but also to depend on them. Diplomatic accords and international agreements were only formal, the realities of border life did not depend on them. Efforts of diplomats to establish a border line during the first half of the 18th century had no practical success. International treaties (Istanbul, Belgrade, Kyuchuk-Kainardzhii, etc.) testify to the existence of practices of changing religious affiliation from Orthodox to Muslim and vice versa. The relevant articles of the treaties emphasized the change of religion as the only condition for the possibility to stay in the respective country. However, it is unlikely that such practices were numerous. Over time, they were no longer under attention. The appearance of a more or less clearly defined border with the corresponding border institutions was traced only after the Russian-Turkish war of 1768-1774. The everyday practices of the frontier people did not change. The borders were rather imagined. Migrant border communities, as well as individual settlers, used border institutions only at their own will and to acquire official status. From the beginning of the 19 century a religious affiliation is no longer a criterion to pay attention to during the crossing of the border and permanent residence. Christian communities (Zaporozhian Cossacks, Nekrasivites) chose as a place of permanent residence the lands under the Muslim ruler. Religious rhetoric was used only by the military and civil leaders of the region, officials to increase influence on making a specific decision. At the beginning of the 19 century the state border and its institutions became denser, but still permeable. The border areas remained free for migratory flows. The strength of the region and its people became especially noticeable in the 19th century when the Russian Empire tried to unify the lands under its control. However, exactly here, in the South of Ukraine, that the empires had to adapt to the traditions of the free region and adjust their policies in accordance with the wishes of the frontier communities. During the 19 century the frontier specificity of the region remained decisive for the historical development of the region.
Odesa I.I. Mechnikov National University
Title: Frontier communities of Southern Ukraine in the 18th – early 19th century: a response to empires
Description:
The article proposes the analysis of new practices of the frontier population of the Southern Ukrainian region during the formation of the linear border and the attempts of the Russian and Ottoman Empires to control frontier communities and territories.
It is shown that the boundary line did not actually divide, but rather united frontier corporations in developing a joint response to attempts at intervention by government institutions.
From the beginning of the 18 century.
The Zaporozhіan Sich and the Crimean Khanate united and worked out similar solutions to solve the problem of active military presence and interference in their own internal affairs by imperial structures.
Joint resistance to the intentions of Russian and Ottoman officials from the Crimean Khan and the Kosh otaman of Zaporozhian Sich due to the establishment of delimitation signs in 1705 began a new tradition.
Imperial governments had not only to reckon with the wishes of frontier communities, but also to depend on them.
Diplomatic accords and international agreements were only formal, the realities of border life did not depend on them.
Efforts of diplomats to establish a border line during the first half of the 18th century had no practical success.
International treaties (Istanbul, Belgrade, Kyuchuk-Kainardzhii, etc.
) testify to the existence of practices of changing religious affiliation from Orthodox to Muslim and vice versa.
The relevant articles of the treaties emphasized the change of religion as the only condition for the possibility to stay in the respective country.
However, it is unlikely that such practices were numerous.
Over time, they were no longer under attention.
The appearance of a more or less clearly defined border with the corresponding border institutions was traced only after the Russian-Turkish war of 1768-1774.
The everyday practices of the frontier people did not change.
The borders were rather imagined.
Migrant border communities, as well as individual settlers, used border institutions only at their own will and to acquire official status.
From the beginning of the 19 century a religious affiliation is no longer a criterion to pay attention to during the crossing of the border and permanent residence.
Christian communities (Zaporozhian Cossacks, Nekrasivites) chose as a place of permanent residence the lands under the Muslim ruler.
Religious rhetoric was used only by the military and civil leaders of the region, officials to increase influence on making a specific decision.
At the beginning of the 19 century the state border and its institutions became denser, but still permeable.
The border areas remained free for migratory flows.
The strength of the region and its people became especially noticeable in the 19th century when the Russian Empire tried to unify the lands under its control.
However, exactly here, in the South of Ukraine, that the empires had to adapt to the traditions of the free region and adjust their policies in accordance with the wishes of the frontier communities.
During the 19 century the frontier specificity of the region remained decisive for the historical development of the region.

Related Results

METAPHORICAL REPRESENTATION OF UKRAINE IN MODERN ENGLISH MASS MEDIA DISCOURSE
METAPHORICAL REPRESENTATION OF UKRAINE IN MODERN ENGLISH MASS MEDIA DISCOURSE
The article describes the metaphorical representation of the image of Ukraine in the mass media discourse. A conceptual metaphor is the main form of expression of the metaphorical ...
Burden of the Beast
Burden of the Beast
Introduction Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and its fluctuating waves of infections and the emergence of new variants, Indigenous populations in Australia and worldwide have re...
SYSTEMATIZATION OF THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK OF ENSURING THE WATER TRANSPORT COMPETITIVENESS IN UKRAINE
SYSTEMATIZATION OF THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK OF ENSURING THE WATER TRANSPORT COMPETITIVENESS IN UKRAINE
Topicality. Business entities in the field of water transport can gain competitive advantages and ensure their competitiveness through the introduction of innovations into the proc...
GEOSPATIAL ASPECTS OF FINANCIAL CAPACITY OF TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES OF TERNOPIL REGION
GEOSPATIAL ASPECTS OF FINANCIAL CAPACITY OF TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES OF TERNOPIL REGION
In the article geospatial aspects of the financial capacity of territorial communities of Ternopil region are described. The need to conduct such a study has been updated, since no...
SOME ISSUES OF THE DEFINITION OF MISDEMEANOR OFFENSE AND ITS TYPES
SOME ISSUES OF THE DEFINITION OF MISDEMEANOR OFFENSE AND ITS TYPES
On January 1, 2020, Law of Ukraine No. 2617-VIII «On Amendments to Some Legislative Acts of Ukraine on Simplification of Pre-Trial Investigation of Certain Criminal Offense Categor...
The National Bank Of Ukraine As A Party To A Court Proceedings
The National Bank Of Ukraine As A Party To A Court Proceedings
The purpose of the article is to determine the procedural status of the National Bank of Ukraine in administrative, civil, and commercial cases, as well as to develop scientificall...
Features of the application of the constitutional term-concept "court" to the body of constitutional jurisdiction of Ukraine
Features of the application of the constitutional term-concept "court" to the body of constitutional jurisdiction of Ukraine
Article examines the legal meaning of the term­concept "Court" as used in the provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine and special legislative acts and analyzes the peculiarities ...
The European Union’s Response to Russian Aggression against Ukraine (2014–2021)
The European Union’s Response to Russian Aggression against Ukraine (2014–2021)
The article examines the European Union’s response to Russian aggression against Ukraine during 2014–2021. It is established that at the political level, the European Union strongl...

Back to Top