Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The formation of the judiciary independence in the Russian Empire (18th century — mid-19th century)
View through CrossRef
The paper, based on an analysis of the legislative acts of the Russian State, considers the historical and legal problem of the formation of an independent court as a separate branch of government in the system of the state apparatus of the Russian Empire and as the principle of ensuring the rule of law in the administration of justice. The period from the 18th century. until the first half of the 19th century. became key in the development of the judicial system of Russia, covering three significant stages, each of which introduced new procedures and principles that contribute to the improvement of justice. The first stage (the beginning of the 18th century — the third quarter of the 18th century) was characterized by the reforms aimed at separating judicial functions into a separate branch of government, which allowed the judicial system to become more independent from other elements of state power. This separation was an important step towards the formation of the principle of separation of powers that was necessary to ensure justice and legality. The second stage (the end of the 18th century — the first quarter of the 19th century) was marked by the formation of the fundamental principles of the image of an independent judiciary. The judicial system, based on the principles of legality, electability and humanism, has become an integral part of the State. At the third stage (the second quarter — the middle of the 19th century), an important aspect of the transformation was the emergence of specialized tribunals. Those changes also affected broader aspects of the judicial system aimed at strengthening its independence and effectiveness. The historical path traveled by the judicial system of the Russian Empire to independence in the 18th century — the middle of the 19th century laid the foundations for further changes in the country’s legal system, which ultimately contributed to the formation of a more humane and fairer judiciary. Elements of continuity of legislation found their way into the judicial reform of 1864.
Title: The formation of the judiciary independence in the Russian Empire (18th century — mid-19th century)
Description:
The paper, based on an analysis of the legislative acts of the Russian State, considers the historical and legal problem of the formation of an independent court as a separate branch of government in the system of the state apparatus of the Russian Empire and as the principle of ensuring the rule of law in the administration of justice.
The period from the 18th century.
until the first half of the 19th century.
became key in the development of the judicial system of Russia, covering three significant stages, each of which introduced new procedures and principles that contribute to the improvement of justice.
The first stage (the beginning of the 18th century — the third quarter of the 18th century) was characterized by the reforms aimed at separating judicial functions into a separate branch of government, which allowed the judicial system to become more independent from other elements of state power.
This separation was an important step towards the formation of the principle of separation of powers that was necessary to ensure justice and legality.
The second stage (the end of the 18th century — the first quarter of the 19th century) was marked by the formation of the fundamental principles of the image of an independent judiciary.
The judicial system, based on the principles of legality, electability and humanism, has become an integral part of the State.
At the third stage (the second quarter — the middle of the 19th century), an important aspect of the transformation was the emergence of specialized tribunals.
Those changes also affected broader aspects of the judicial system aimed at strengthening its independence and effectiveness.
The historical path traveled by the judicial system of the Russian Empire to independence in the 18th century — the middle of the 19th century laid the foundations for further changes in the country’s legal system, which ultimately contributed to the formation of a more humane and fairer judiciary.
Elements of continuity of legislation found their way into the judicial reform of 1864.
Related Results
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
This study examines the evolving role of the judiciary in Pakistan in interpreting the Constitution, exploring how the courts have come to terms with their position as the primary ...
Independence of judiciary in Bangladesh: an overview
Independence of judiciary in Bangladesh: an overview
PurposeThe aim of this paper is to analyze the status of independence of the judiciary in Bangladesh. It is recognized worldwide that an independent judiciary is the sin qua non of...
Judicial Accountability and Judicial Transparency: Challenges to Indian Judiciary
Judicial Accountability and Judicial Transparency: Challenges to Indian Judiciary
Indian polity is under severe strain. Faith of the people in the quality, integrity and efficiency of governmental institutions stands seriously eroded. They turn to the judiciary ...
Judicial Independence in China: Common Myths and Unfounded Assumptions
Judicial Independence in China: Common Myths and Unfounded Assumptions
The Chinese judiciary is regularly criticized for the lack of independence. The lack of "genuine progress" in establishing an independent judiciary is then cited as evidence that ...
Reformasi Kelembagaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Menjaga Independensi Kekuasaan Kehakiman
Reformasi Kelembagaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Menjaga Independensi Kekuasaan Kehakiman
This article discusses how the independence of the judiciary is based on the Constitutional Court Decision. The obligation of a state of law or rechstaat is the independence of the...
EVOLUTION OF INDONESIAN JUDICIARY: FROM STRUGGLE OF INDEPENDENCE TO CRISIS OF ACCOUNTABILITY
EVOLUTION OF INDONESIAN JUDICIARY: FROM STRUGGLE OF INDEPENDENCE TO CRISIS OF ACCOUNTABILITY
The history of the Indonesian judiciary includes elements of irony. During authoritarian rule under Sukarno's era (1959–1966) and Suharto's era (1966–1998), judges put up long stru...
Does the judiciary matter for accountability of administration in Bangladesh?
Does the judiciary matter for accountability of administration in Bangladesh?
PurposeThe aim of this paper is to analyze the role of the judiciary in ensuring legal accountability of government officials and its impact on governance in the context of Banglad...
Clash of Superpowers: Dollar vs Ruble
Clash of Superpowers: Dollar vs Ruble
History tells us nothing is permanent. We live in an ocean of time, and its main virtue is 'Changing'. Today, you are a slave, tomorrow, you can be the master. Today you are Nikola...

