Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Transarterial chemoembolization plus sorafenib versus sorafenib for intermediate–advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background:
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks as the sixth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, local and systemic therapies are beneficial for those who have more advanced disease or are not suitable for radical treatment. We aim to investigate the clinical outcomes of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus sorafenib compared with sorafenib monotherapy for intermediate–advanced HCC.
Methods:
A systematic search according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines in the PubMed database was conducted from inception to December 31, 2020 for published studies comparing survival outcomes and tumor response between TACE + sorafenib and sorafenib alone for intermediate–advanced HCC.
Results:
Five eligible cohort studies and a randomized controlled trial with a total of 3015 patients were identified. We found that the TACE + sorafenib group had a significantly better overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66–0.88, P < .001) than those treated with sorafenib. Median OS ranged from 7.0 to 22.0 months with TACE + sorafenib and from 5.9 to 18.0 months with sorafenib. The combination of TACE + sorafenib had a significantly better time to progression (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI 0.65–0.82, P < .001) than those treated with sorafenib. Median time to progression ranged from 2.5 to 5.3 months with TACE + sorafenib and from 2.1 to 2.8 months with sorafenib. The results showed the TACE + sorafenib group had a higher disease control rate (log odds ratio, 0.52; 95% CI 0.25–0.80, P = .0002), objective response rate (log odds ratio, 0.85; 95% CI 0.37–1.33, P = .0006) than sorafenib group. Hand–foot skin reaction, diarrhea, fatigue, vomiting, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation were common adverse events. The adverse events were similar between the 2 groups excluding elevated ALT.
Conclusion:
Although the TACE + sorafenib group had a higher elevated ALT, the combination of TACE + sorafenib had an OS benefit compared with sorafenib in the treatment of intermediate–advanced HCC. Further research is necessary to affirm this finding and clarify whether certain subgroups benefit from different combinations between TACE and sorafenib.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Transarterial chemoembolization plus sorafenib versus sorafenib for intermediate–advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Description:
Abstract
Background:
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks as the sixth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, local and systemic therapies are beneficial for those who have more advanced disease or are not suitable for radical treatment.
We aim to investigate the clinical outcomes of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus sorafenib compared with sorafenib monotherapy for intermediate–advanced HCC.
Methods:
A systematic search according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines in the PubMed database was conducted from inception to December 31, 2020 for published studies comparing survival outcomes and tumor response between TACE + sorafenib and sorafenib alone for intermediate–advanced HCC.
Results:
Five eligible cohort studies and a randomized controlled trial with a total of 3015 patients were identified.
We found that the TACE + sorafenib group had a significantly better overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio, 0.
77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.
66–0.
88, P < .
001) than those treated with sorafenib.
Median OS ranged from 7.
0 to 22.
0 months with TACE + sorafenib and from 5.
9 to 18.
0 months with sorafenib.
The combination of TACE + sorafenib had a significantly better time to progression (hazard ratio, 0.
74; 95% CI 0.
65–0.
82, P < .
001) than those treated with sorafenib.
Median time to progression ranged from 2.
5 to 5.
3 months with TACE + sorafenib and from 2.
1 to 2.
8 months with sorafenib.
The results showed the TACE + sorafenib group had a higher disease control rate (log odds ratio, 0.
52; 95% CI 0.
25–0.
80, P = .
0002), objective response rate (log odds ratio, 0.
85; 95% CI 0.
37–1.
33, P = .
0006) than sorafenib group.
Hand–foot skin reaction, diarrhea, fatigue, vomiting, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation were common adverse events.
The adverse events were similar between the 2 groups excluding elevated ALT.
Conclusion:
Although the TACE + sorafenib group had a higher elevated ALT, the combination of TACE + sorafenib had an OS benefit compared with sorafenib in the treatment of intermediate–advanced HCC.
Further research is necessary to affirm this finding and clarify whether certain subgroups benefit from different combinations between TACE and sorafenib.
Related Results
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Bridge Therapy before Liver Transplant for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Bridge Therapy before Liver Transplant for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common primary liver tumor. Orthotopic liver transplant is one of the best treatment options, but its waiting list has to be considered. Bridge...
Abstract 4266: Acquired resistance to sorafenib yields CXCL12 (SDF1α) over-expression and increases invasion in hepatocarcinoma cells
Abstract 4266: Acquired resistance to sorafenib yields CXCL12 (SDF1α) over-expression and increases invasion in hepatocarcinoma cells
Abstract
Background: Sorafenib has a well known efficacy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Sorafenib displays antiangiogenic effects by targe...
Evaluating the GALAD Score in Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Evaluating the GALAD Score in Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma
This paper aims to evaluate the GALAD score in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma. The paper conducted a retrospective study of 86 Hepatocellular Carcinoma patients who underwent ...
Retrospective analysis of patient data after transarterial chemoembolization of the hepatic artery
Retrospective analysis of patient data after transarterial chemoembolization of the hepatic artery
The purpose of this research: to conduct a retrospective analysis of patient data after transarterial chemoembolization of the hepatic artery. Methods. A retrospective study was ca...
YAP promotes sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma by upregulating survivin
YAP promotes sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma by upregulating survivin
Abstract
Background
Sorafenib is the standard first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but its use is hampered by the secondary drug resistance. Y...
Abstract 4145: Increased anti-tumor effect of sorafenib by depleting tumor associated macrophages
Abstract 4145: Increased anti-tumor effect of sorafenib by depleting tumor associated macrophages
Abstract
Background: Sorafenib prolonged survival in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the effect is modest and tumor finally progressed...

