Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Transarterial chemoembolization plus sorafenib versus sorafenib for intermediate–advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background:
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks as the sixth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, local and systemic therapies are beneficial for those who have more advanced disease or are not suitable for radical treatment. We aim to investigate the clinical outcomes of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus sorafenib compared with sorafenib monotherapy for intermediate–advanced HCC.
Methods:
A systematic search according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines in the PubMed database was conducted from inception to December 31, 2020 for published studies comparing survival outcomes and tumor response between TACE + sorafenib and sorafenib alone for intermediate–advanced HCC.
Results:
Five eligible cohort studies and a randomized controlled trial with a total of 3015 patients were identified. We found that the TACE + sorafenib group had a significantly better overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66–0.88, P < .001) than those treated with sorafenib. Median OS ranged from 7.0 to 22.0 months with TACE + sorafenib and from 5.9 to 18.0 months with sorafenib. The combination of TACE + sorafenib had a significantly better time to progression (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI 0.65–0.82, P < .001) than those treated with sorafenib. Median time to progression ranged from 2.5 to 5.3 months with TACE + sorafenib and from 2.1 to 2.8 months with sorafenib. The results showed the TACE + sorafenib group had a higher disease control rate (log odds ratio, 0.52; 95% CI 0.25–0.80, P = .0002), objective response rate (log odds ratio, 0.85; 95% CI 0.37–1.33, P = .0006) than sorafenib group. Hand–foot skin reaction, diarrhea, fatigue, vomiting, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation were common adverse events. The adverse events were similar between the 2 groups excluding elevated ALT.
Conclusion:
Although the TACE + sorafenib group had a higher elevated ALT, the combination of TACE + sorafenib had an OS benefit compared with sorafenib in the treatment of intermediate–advanced HCC. Further research is necessary to affirm this finding and clarify whether certain subgroups benefit from different combinations between TACE and sorafenib.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Transarterial chemoembolization plus sorafenib versus sorafenib for intermediate–advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Description:
Abstract
Background:
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks as the sixth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, local and systemic therapies are beneficial for those who have more advanced disease or are not suitable for radical treatment.
We aim to investigate the clinical outcomes of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus sorafenib compared with sorafenib monotherapy for intermediate–advanced HCC.
Methods:
A systematic search according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines in the PubMed database was conducted from inception to December 31, 2020 for published studies comparing survival outcomes and tumor response between TACE + sorafenib and sorafenib alone for intermediate–advanced HCC.
Results:
Five eligible cohort studies and a randomized controlled trial with a total of 3015 patients were identified.
We found that the TACE + sorafenib group had a significantly better overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio, 0.
77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.
66–0.
88, P < .
001) than those treated with sorafenib.
Median OS ranged from 7.
0 to 22.
0 months with TACE + sorafenib and from 5.
9 to 18.
0 months with sorafenib.
The combination of TACE + sorafenib had a significantly better time to progression (hazard ratio, 0.
74; 95% CI 0.
65–0.
82, P < .
001) than those treated with sorafenib.
Median time to progression ranged from 2.
5 to 5.
3 months with TACE + sorafenib and from 2.
1 to 2.
8 months with sorafenib.
The results showed the TACE + sorafenib group had a higher disease control rate (log odds ratio, 0.
52; 95% CI 0.
25–0.
80, P = .
0002), objective response rate (log odds ratio, 0.
85; 95% CI 0.
37–1.
33, P = .
0006) than sorafenib group.
Hand–foot skin reaction, diarrhea, fatigue, vomiting, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation were common adverse events.
The adverse events were similar between the 2 groups excluding elevated ALT.
Conclusion:
Although the TACE + sorafenib group had a higher elevated ALT, the combination of TACE + sorafenib had an OS benefit compared with sorafenib in the treatment of intermediate–advanced HCC.
Further research is necessary to affirm this finding and clarify whether certain subgroups benefit from different combinations between TACE and sorafenib.
Related Results
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Abstract 4266: Acquired resistance to sorafenib yields CXCL12 (SDF1α) over-expression and increases invasion in hepatocarcinoma cells
Abstract 4266: Acquired resistance to sorafenib yields CXCL12 (SDF1α) over-expression and increases invasion in hepatocarcinoma cells
Abstract
Background: Sorafenib has a well known efficacy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Sorafenib displays antiangiogenic effects by targe...
Evaluating the GALAD Score in Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Evaluating the GALAD Score in Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma
This paper aims to evaluate the GALAD score in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma. The paper conducted a retrospective study of 86 Hepatocellular Carcinoma patients who underwent ...
YAP promotes sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma by upregulating survivin
YAP promotes sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma by upregulating survivin
Abstract
Background
Sorafenib is the standard first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but its use is hampered by the secondary drug resistance. Y...
Abstract 4145: Increased anti-tumor effect of sorafenib by depleting tumor associated macrophages
Abstract 4145: Increased anti-tumor effect of sorafenib by depleting tumor associated macrophages
Abstract
Background: Sorafenib prolonged survival in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the effect is modest and tumor finally progressed...
Compassionate Use of Sorafenib in Relapsed and Refractory Flt3-ITD Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Compassionate Use of Sorafenib in Relapsed and Refractory Flt3-ITD Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Abstract
Abstract 2060
Poster Board II-37
Introduction:
The Flt3-internal tandem duplication can b...
Activation of c-Jun predicts a poor response to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma: Preliminary Clinical Evidence
Activation of c-Jun predicts a poor response to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma: Preliminary Clinical Evidence
AbstractWe determined the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) gene expression profile of acquired resistance in sorafenib-sensitive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells and aim...

