Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Efficacy of Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) in Combination with Radiation Therapy, compared to ADT alone in Patients with High-Risk Prostate Cancer: a meta-analysis
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has long been a cornerstone of treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. The efficacy of ADT plus radiotherapy (RT) compared to ADT alone remains unclear due to conflicting results in existing literature. The aim of the study is to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of ADT combined with RT versus ADT alone in patients with prostate cancer (clinically node positive, locally advancer disease, metastatic disease), focusing on overall survival (OS), prostate-specific mortality (PSM), progression-free survival (PFS), and the risk of complications.
Methods
A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus, between 1st January 2000 and 15th October 2024, was done to identify studies comparing ADT alone to ADT in combination with RT. Hazard ratios (HR) and relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the outcomes. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the standard GRADE approach.
Results
A total of 8 studies met the inclusion criteria (6 RCTs and 2 cohort studies). These studies included 18,456 patients. The combination of ADT and RT significantly improved OS (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.63, 0.90), PFS (HR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.20, 0.84), and reduced PSM (HR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.34, 0.78) compared to ADT alone. Subgroup analysis showed greater OS (HR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.59, 0.75) and PSM (HR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.39, 0.49) in patients with locally advanced or node-positive disease. ADT + RT was also associated with increased risks of genitourinary (RR = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.15, 2.82), gastrointestinal (RR = 4.18, 95% CI: 1.46, 11.96), and sexual dysfunction (RR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.18) related complications. The overall certainty of evidence was judged to be “moderate” for survival outcomes and “Low” for risk of complications.
Conclusion
Combining ADT with radiation therapy RT significantly improves survival, compared to ADT alone, especially in patients with locally advanced or node-positive prostate cancer. However, this combination also increases the risk of complications. Further research is needed to refine treatment protocols and identify the optimal timing and patient subgroups for this approach.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Efficacy of Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) in Combination with Radiation Therapy, compared to ADT alone in Patients with High-Risk Prostate Cancer: a meta-analysis
Description:
Abstract
Background
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has long been a cornerstone of treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
The efficacy of ADT plus radiotherapy (RT) compared to ADT alone remains unclear due to conflicting results in existing literature.
The aim of the study is to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of ADT combined with RT versus ADT alone in patients with prostate cancer (clinically node positive, locally advancer disease, metastatic disease), focusing on overall survival (OS), prostate-specific mortality (PSM), progression-free survival (PFS), and the risk of complications.
Methods
A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus, between 1st January 2000 and 15th October 2024, was done to identify studies comparing ADT alone to ADT in combination with RT.
Hazard ratios (HR) and relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the outcomes.
The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the standard GRADE approach.
Results
A total of 8 studies met the inclusion criteria (6 RCTs and 2 cohort studies).
These studies included 18,456 patients.
The combination of ADT and RT significantly improved OS (HR = 0.
75, 95% CI: 0.
63, 0.
90), PFS (HR = 0.
41, 95% CI: 0.
20, 0.
84), and reduced PSM (HR = 0.
52, 95% CI: 0.
34, 0.
78) compared to ADT alone.
Subgroup analysis showed greater OS (HR 0.
66, 95% CI: 0.
59, 0.
75) and PSM (HR 0.
43, 95% CI: 0.
39, 0.
49) in patients with locally advanced or node-positive disease.
ADT + RT was also associated with increased risks of genitourinary (RR = 1.
80, 95% CI: 1.
15, 2.
82), gastrointestinal (RR = 4.
18, 95% CI: 1.
46, 11.
96), and sexual dysfunction (RR = 1.
10, 95% CI: 1.
02, 1.
18) related complications.
The overall certainty of evidence was judged to be “moderate” for survival outcomes and “Low” for risk of complications.
Conclusion
Combining ADT with radiation therapy RT significantly improves survival, compared to ADT alone, especially in patients with locally advanced or node-positive prostate cancer.
However, this combination also increases the risk of complications.
Further research is needed to refine treatment protocols and identify the optimal timing and patient subgroups for this approach.
Related Results
Abstract A6: Androgen receptor-mediated transcription is reprogrammed after hormone depletion
Abstract A6: Androgen receptor-mediated transcription is reprogrammed after hormone depletion
Abstract
Androgen receptor (AR) is a ligand-induced transcription factor, which binds to thousands of genomic loci and activates a cell-type specific gene expression...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that promotes antitumor immunity. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety...
Efficacy of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with advanced prostate cancer
Efficacy of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with advanced prostate cancer
AbstractBACKGROUNDThe purpose of this study was to compare predictive factors for the efficacy of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in men with hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer (...
The curative effect of androgen deprivation therapy alone is insufficient in high-risk prostate cancer
The curative effect of androgen deprivation therapy alone is insufficient in high-risk prostate cancer
Abstract
To compare the outcomes of patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated by primary radical prostatectomy (RP) and primary androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)...
Abstract 4602: Clinicopathological and genetic features of prostate cancer in Algerian patients: First report
Abstract 4602: Clinicopathological and genetic features of prostate cancer in Algerian patients: First report
Abstract
Background: Prostate cancer is the second most frequent malignancy (after lung cancer) in men worldwide. It is the third most common cancer in men in Algeri...
The Effect of Androgen Deprivation Therapy on the Cardiovascular System in Advanced Prostate Cancer
The Effect of Androgen Deprivation Therapy on the Cardiovascular System in Advanced Prostate Cancer
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a mainstay treatment for metastatic prostate cancer, improving progression-free survival. ADT suppresses the production of testosterone and re...
Post Hoc Subgroup Analysis of Clinical Outcomes in Patients With High‐Risk Metastatic Hormone‐Naïve Prostate Cancer: Results From a 3‐Year Interim Analysis of the J‐ROCK Study
Post Hoc Subgroup Analysis of Clinical Outcomes in Patients With High‐Risk Metastatic Hormone‐Naïve Prostate Cancer: Results From a 3‐Year Interim Analysis of the J‐ROCK Study
ABSTRACT
Introduction
In real‐world practice in Japan, standard treatment for metastatic hormone‐naïve prostate cancer (m...

